What would you expect authorities to do in this case:

[hedgehog]

A therapist comes in and reports to authorities that she has a patient who has long held homicidal tendencies. He now feels threatened, has accumulated weapons and a bullet proof vest, and has told her in the presence of others that he intends to go out in a blaze of glory. Oh, and by the way, he has access to anthrax and who the hell knows what other kinds of bio-weapons.

Given this information, the authorities should

[Breeze54]

1. I don't get your poll... she got a restraining order and that guy

has a history dating way back of making death threats

[screembloodymurder]

2. The point is, he's dangerous to himself and others.

You take him into custody immediately. Unless, you want him dead.

[Buzz Clik]

3. This is after the authorities have spent three years harassing the suspect, right?

And the fact that the suspect has access to anthrax but has no ability to weaponize it makes no difference, right?

[kevsand]

4. None of the above.

The correct answer is to keep the subject under constant, armed surveillance and begin any necessary paperwork or court proceedings with all due expedited haste.

[hedgehog]

5. That's not what they did in this case:

http://newstandardnews.net/content/?action=show_item&itemid=646

[kevsand]

6. Talk about the other side of the coin.

How did that case turn out in the end, or is it still going?

[RC]

7. I'm thinking the real root of the matter...

""Free Range Grains" explores the genetic modification of food by utilizing a common laboratory setup and everyday food, Thompson explained. The performance involves using a DNA amplifier to demonstrate traces of genes from other organisms inserted into the genetic makeup of food provided by audience members, he said."

Monsanto has long tentacles.