Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How Did A Whackjob "Homicidal" Scientist Get Security Clearance To Work With Bioterrorism Agents?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 10:46 AM
Original message
How Did A Whackjob "Homicidal" Scientist Get Security Clearance To Work With Bioterrorism Agents?
Edited on Sat Aug-02-08 10:47 AM by kpete
Serious consideration should be given to how a whackjob homicidal scientist gets and keeps a security clearance that allows him to work with bioterrorism agents.

Also, I'm still dubious about the claims Ivins' analyst made--because she claims he has homicidal tendencies going back years, which none of the people interviewed about Ivins seem to have noticed.

In court records, filed after Dr. Ivins discussed his plans to kill his co-workers, a social worker who led the sessions, Jean Duley, said that Dr. Ivins’s psychiatrist had “called him homicidal, sociopathic with clear intentions.” She went on to say that the Federal Bureau of Investigation was looking at Dr. Ivins and that he would soon be charged with five murders — the same number of fatalities in the anthrax attacks.

“He is a revenge killer,” Ms. Duley told a Maryland District Court judge in Frederick as she sought a restraining order against Dr. Ivins. “When he feels that he has been slighted, and especially towards women, he plots and actually tries to carry out revenge killings.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/02/us/02scientist.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin


more at:
http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/08/02/ivins-and-the-anthrax-investigation/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Obviously Bill Clinton's Fault
That's what we'll hear on Fox, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Nelson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. LOL!
of course!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is a classic smear campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Nelson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Looks like a perfect scapegoat
I guess they don't want us to think it was "Mrs. Anthrax" or "Chemical Ali" anymore

More propaganda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. This was after the Anthrax attacks
he fell off the reality plane after the FBI began investigating him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. some of the news stories are saying it goes back to grad school
which further begs the ? of how he got the job and why they kept him in it for years!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I haven't seen those News stories - have a link
Because that does sound slightly out of character to the story claiming he was a quiet neighbor dedicated to his wife and family that raised his sons well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. here's an NPR link, think I also saw on msnbc.com
Either way something doesn't add up - either he shouldn't have gotten this job, or they're making this up now. :shrug:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=93218181

...

Social worker Jean C. Duley filed handwritten court documents last week saying she was preparing to testify before a grand jury. She said Ivins would be charged with five capital murders.

"Client has a history dating to his graduate days of homicidal threats, plans and actions towards therapists," Duley said, adding that his psychiatrist had described him as homicidal and sociopathic.

Authorities had watched Ivins for some time. His brother, Tom Ivins, said federal agents questioned the scientist about a year and a half ago. Neighbors said FBI agents in cars with tinted windows conducted surveillance on his home. A colleague, Henry S. Heine, said that over the past year, he and others on their team had testified before a federal grand jury in Washington that has been investigating the anthrax mailings.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. still a little puzzeling - Therapist is full of shit
Edited on Sat Aug-02-08 02:38 PM by FreakinDJ
On Edit -

This therapist is full of shit

Ever since the 1950s they have been doing extensive FBI checks on DOD workers. He never would have gotten the job in the first place if there had been any thing questionable in his past. - And yes they go all the way way to lil Johny's 4th grade teacher and ask her if he "played well with others"

http://media.npr.org/images/ap//AP_News_Wire:_US_News/4_Anthrax_Scientist.sff_198.jpg

Bruce Ivins, founder of the Frederick Jugglers, gives a juggling demonstration at Mullinix Park in Frederick, Md. on May 9, 1983.


Compared to this -

Ivins' lawyer, Paul F. Kemp, asserted the scientist's innocence and said he had cooperated with investigators for more than a year.

Kemp said his client's death was the result of the government's "relentless pressure of accusation and innuendo."



and they have a motive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. if there's something this serious, he should have been evaluated by MULTIPLE
psychiatrists. Hell, good animal shelters and rescues have more than one person do temperament testing!

So far I haven't heard anything but the word of this one therapist or supervisor, AFTER DoJ/FBI involved.

Just heard some good NPR reporting - posted here http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=3721081&mesg_id=3721081


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. did a therapist write "theripist"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmileyRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #32
41. Good catch.
almost funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. He was a Pro-Life Republican opposed to Gay Marriage, obviously. That's the Bush criteria.
They did a Lexis-Nexis search using phrases like "Homo!" but not "Homicid!".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. Especially since he may not have been qualified as a scientist, either.
I don't know whether to believe anything I'm reading about Ivins at this point, but "some people say" that he wasn't a very accomplished scientist and his papers weren't very good.

Which, if true, leads around to the overall question - Is Ft. Detrick staffed by incompetent nutjobs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. Don't forget he watched while they tried to destroy his colleague, Hatfill.
That must have hit him very hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. These guys were "Cleared by the FBI"
You don't get to work in those labs unless you have a "spotless" record. That protocal goes back to the 1950s
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. There's no way.
I worked with an ex-CIA guy once. He had the highest security clearance and every couple of years, scary government agents had to come in our workplace and interview each of us alone with questions about his character. There is no way a scientist would get top clearance if there were anything questionable in his background, unless someone within the Bush administration wanted him to get clearance. Hell, I had the lowest clearance and they went through my background several years with a fine-toothed comb. I'm not buying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. Except that political considerations can override security determinations.
Your clause may be the key here - "unless someone within the Bush administration wanted him to get clearance."

And it may go back to way before the Bush administration, too. Ft. Detrick has been doing monstrous things since WWII or earlier. My uncle worked there during WWII, and he said that they were experimenting on people. That turned out to be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. My mother worked DOD in the 1950s
and even then you had to have an extensive back ground check to work there.

- if that indeed was the case "he was allowed to work there even with a checkered past" he would have been the first suspect, not the second suspect
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Epiphany4z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. aww hell
look who they let be president and vp i think being a homicidal whack job has become a pre requisite .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. "Weapons grade" anthrax
The Us has WMD's !! OMG!! We should invade ourselves!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. or in any case, other countries have the right to! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
11. That was my question
This whole thing stinks to high heaven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
12. I wonder how many books by O'Reilly, Hannity and Limbaugh are lying around his house
Did he listen to the radio or watch TV?

According to his psychiatrist, "He is a revenge killer.... When he feels that he has been slighted, and especially towards women, he plots and actually tries to carry out revenge killings." So, where did Mr. Ivins get the idea that liberals were the enemy? What did Daschle do to slight Mr. Ivins? Was it because Limbaugh used to refer to Daschle as "El Diablo" throughout 2001? Rather than sweeping this under the rug, and declaring the story over, the press needs to take a look at where Mr. Ivins got his motivation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
13. Monica Goodling hired him because he was pro-life and anti-gay? n/t
Edited on Sat Aug-02-08 11:19 AM by IanDB1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
larkrake Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
14. I seriously doubt it was suicide or that this poor schmuck
Edited on Sat Aug-02-08 11:21 AM by larkrake
had anything to do with the anthrax attacks. Brilliant scientists are not prone to joining the human race, and their work is always mis-used by the war machine agents. The fact remains the attacks were on democrats and it was the neo-cons who would benefit from the fear card. Those in power have proven they will reort to murder and killing to feed their schemes. This man was going to go public so was killed and painted as a killer loon.His "crimes" have been embellished daily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
15. What are the odds someone making deadly bacteria might harbor urges to kill people?
His "suicide" is now the only thing that disqualifies him as McCain's running-mate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. People who work on deadly bacteria are interested in science.
They aren't any more prone to have urges to kill people than anyone else. In fact, they probably are less prone to have urges to kill people. They even nurture bacteria that most of us would kill right away if we could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Good point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #25
37. I think people working on deadly bacteria in Fort Detrick are a wee bit different.
It's the land of consequentialist ethics, of breaking eggs to make omelets. Perhaps this guy just wanted a bigger omelet than the rest of the germ warfare scientists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
19. is his "history" based on self-reporting?
because when someone is mentally ill, they may not be recalling their own history accurately. I agree this just doesn't add up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
22. Either way this reflects very badly on the Bush administration.
Let's say that all these stories about Ivins are true. That means that the Bush administration allowed a homicidal maniac to continue working with weapons-grade biological weapons of mass destruction for seven years after he was suspected of a terrorist attack that killed five people. WTF?

That's the Bush administration's story?

The alternative is that somebody at a high level is conducting a comprehensive smear campaign against Ivins to make it look like he was the perpetrator, while the "real perp" is still unfound. Oh, and somebody offed the scientist. Or he was driven to suicide by federal harassment.

Either way this alone should be grounds for an immediate Congressional investigation. Botched either way, seems to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
23. I have been asking the same question.
I don't believe that he was always the whack job they claim he was at the end. The whole story is suspicious.

I think the government is pretty careful about security checks. He could never have lasted that long in that job with such serious personality problems. I just don't believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
30. They don't. And he wasn't.
It's a smear campaign against the easiest of targets: dead people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
33. i've read absolutely NOTHING about this man's motive....why????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
34. Who else would you get to do this type of work. Hello? nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
35. Duley's unequivocal claim that Ivin's is "a revenge killer." Therapist and Homocide Profiler?
Or does she have personal knowledge of his past homocides?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
36. "social worker" Jean Duley, all due respect, doesn't have fuck all qualifications
to diagnose anyone of anything, much less calling a man a sociopath with homicidal ideation.

It is utterly shocking that nobody in the major news outlets is even marginally wondering about this bone-stupid affidavit. This person is thoroughly unqualified to diagnose any mental illness whatsoever. And they're citing her chicken scratch opinionating as if it were medical gospel. This is fucking disgusting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. If you scan the article, she seems to be quoting his shrink.
Maybe embellishing when she calls him a revenge killer, but in an earlier paragraph, quoting the doctor.

And having said that, I've known too many shrinks to give that much more weight.

Who is that shrink? Does he work for DoD? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. I know what she SAID
But it is pretty thin hearsay evidence to quote in this manner. They should release the assessment of the shrink him or herself, in that case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Exactly. And the news outlets give the impression that she is
a psychologist, which she isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
38. how did bush get into the white house?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faux pas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
39. I'm pretty sure he's being scapegoated, that's the American
Way now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC