No, this Bush shilling by anchors across the networks is not new, but this is IN YER FACE media corruption at some of its most blatant:
"Warrantless wiretapping of Americans; torturing and kidnapping and detaining numerous prisoners, foreign enemy combatants, prisoners, whatever they could be classified as; the fact that we have become a severely surveilled population now with the abuses of the Patriot Act--all done under the cloak of government secrecy. Political spying; the attacks on academic freedom; the politicization of the Justice Department; selective prosecutions--so many areas fertile for inquiring by this Congress."
Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.), responding to the sentiment that impeachment would be "overzealous partisanship":
"....a real waste of taxpayer money and Congress' time."
Campbell Brown
CNN Scoffs at White House Critics
Anchor with Bush ties dismisses abuse-of-power hearings as 'stagecraft'
7/31/08
CNN's Election Center program devoted a July 25 report to mocking a hearing of the House Judiciary Committee investigating White House abuses of power.
"Believe it or not, there was a congressional hearing today about impeaching the president," scoffed host Campbell Brown, who added: "It was all stagecraft, though." Brown went on to introduce the report by CNN correspondent Erica Hill by saying, "Tell us about this piece of Kabuki theater, Erica."
(see full article)
Host Campbell Brown closed the report by saying: "All right. So this is really just stagecraft, not to mention a real waste of taxpayer money and Congress' time." Needless to say, the suggestion that looking into the weighty matters addressed by the hearing is a "waste of taxpayer money" is a remarkable statement from a supposedly unbiased anchor.
It is worth noting that Brown is married to Dan Senor, who was a deputy press secretary for George W. Bush before becoming the chief spokesperson for the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq. (He's currently a Fox Newsanalyst.) Given that much of the discussion of executive malfeasance concerns the Iraq War, it is inappropriate for Brown to even be covering an investigation of abuses of power that involve her husband's former associates--let alone for her to dismiss such inquiries as a waste of time and money. If CNN had been around in 1974, would it have allowed the spouse of a former Nixon spokesperson to report on the Watergate hearings?
more:
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3584(bold emphasis mine)