Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AlterNet: Our government finds it necessary to protect us from academics who disagree with Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 07:27 AM
Original message
AlterNet: Our government finds it necessary to protect us from academics who disagree with Bush
Respected Academic Denied Entry into U.S.

By Sean Gonsalves, AlterNet. Posted July 30, 2008.

Our government finds it necessary to protect Americans from academics who disagree with Bush.




It's not just "security walls" that can keep "aliens" from entering Fortress America.

The State Department has this thing they call "prudential revocation" of a foreigner's visa. Translating the bureaucratese into English, that means the government doesn't have to make a formal finding about why an "alien" is being denied entry. A "prudential revocation" means the governments thinks you might be ineligible for entry.

Case in point: Professor Adam Habib, a leading South African political scientist and Vice Chancellor at the University of Johannesburg, who also happens be a critic of Bush's misled crusade to maintain U.S. hegemony over Middle Eastern energy resources under the guise of ridding the world of "terrorism."

In October 2006, Habib, a Muslim, flew into New York City because he was invited to attend an academic symposium being held by the /fixthefxi.blogspot.com/2007/11/adam-habib-south-africa-and-us.html"> South Africa-based Freedom of Expression Institute (FXI).

The cited reason for revoking Habib's visa is a section of the U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act that says any 'alien' who has engaged in a terrorist activity, or who is believed to be a terrorist threat, can be denied entry.

The law also says that anyone who represents a foreign terrorist organization, or endorses terrorist views, can also be excluded. But, the convoluted denial did not explain how Habib supposedly violated the Act. ......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.alternet.org/columnists/story/93361/respected_academic_denied_entry_into_u.s._/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Too stupid to realize how fast these stories spread on the nets...
and how many of us are going to Google the guy now. Talk about free publicity.

Keep it up asshats. It's working out real well for the Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC