Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Under New Proposals, Some Rape Victims Wouldn't Get Emergency Contraception

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 05:20 AM
Original message
Under New Proposals, Some Rape Victims Wouldn't Get Emergency Contraception
http://www.alternet.org/reproductivejustice/93202

Under New Proposals, Some Rape Victims Wouldn't Get Emergency Contraception
By Marie Cocco, Washington Post Writers Group. Posted July 31, 2008.

Conservatives are proposing a federal rule that would go so far as to allow providers to deny rape victims emergency contraception.

WASHINGTON -- From the people who brought you the Terri Schiavo spectacle, the stem-cell research stalemate and the atrocious waste of tax money on abstinence-only sex education that has been shown not to work, comes a sequel: a proposal to redefine abortion to include some of the most common forms of birth control, and to potentially penalize with funding cuts hundreds of thousands of doctors, hospitals and other health care providers who expect their employees to give women full reproductive care.

This parting gift to the religious right comes in a proposed rule by the Health and Human Services Department, which says it is merely revising existing federal rules that allow health-care personnel to opt out of performing an abortion if they have a moral or religious objection to the procedure. From that minimalist and unobjectionable clause, a monster grows.

The draft regulation would redefine abortion to include "any of the various procedures -- including the prescription, dispensing and administration of any drug or the performance of any procedure or any other action -- that results in the termination of the life of a human being in utero between conception and natural birth, whether before or after implantation."

The right wing has failed to win approval of a "human life" amendment to the Constitution that would declare that life begins at conception. It has failed to get even conservative-leaning courts to go along with the most extreme elements of its anti-abortion agenda. It failed to block approval of the RU-486 pill that produces a medical abortion. It failed to block government approval of emergency contraception -- the "morning after" pill long promoted by the medical profession -- which is taken whether or not a woman even knows she is pregnant. Seven years ago, when the first Bush administration budget included language that would drop a requirement that federal workers' health insurance plans offer contraception if the plan includes coverage of prescription drugs, a bipartisan storm extinguished the idea.

And so, having failed to keep American women from having access to basic birth control, the right is trying to use the guise of an existing "conscience" requirement to achieve what it cannot accomplish through an open political process. You could, if you were taken to an emergency room after being raped, be told by a worker invoking the conscience clause that you cannot have a drug to prevent a possible pregnancy.

- snip -

Administration officials say they cannot comment in detail on the proposal because it is a draft. They insist it is being promoted merely because the agency has an obligation to enforce the existing conscience rules. Yet the document reveals its own origins: In recent years, as religious conservatives have tried to get pharmacies to allow employees to refuse to dispense birth control pills to women, states have responded with laws that require the prescriptions to be filled. Six states have laws ensuring that pharmacies will fill birth control prescriptions and 27 have laws guaranteeing equity in insurance prescription coverage for contraception, according to Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., Fourteen states currently have laws guaranteeing rape victims access to emergency contraception.

MORE

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. I can't understand why they want to force women to have babies
regardless of how they were conceived.
Who is the bigger monster here? The rapist of the monsters forcing the victim to carry a child conceived out of violence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. its is about power and control
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. BINGO! That's exactly it. No matter what other excuses they use...
...that is exactly what it's about - power and CONTROL over women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Are these stupid fundies wanting a civil war?
Because this is laying the foundation for one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. Well, if George and Robin had access to "emergency contraception" in 1971...
I don't know why the rest of us can't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
7. Just evil
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. Small towns typically have one hospital at most.
And one town I can think of has a hospital owned by the Catholic Church. Those women would have to go to the county hospital in another city to get emergency contraception. After a traumatic rape, a woman might worry about pregnancy, but not be able to clearly process where she should go for help. These bastards don't give a damn about women (or children), only their political platforms.

I hope we can put this off until Obama takes office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. And that's assuming her injuries might not be too serious.
Can you imagine being raped and almost beaten to death? Being drugged up on painkillers or recovering from surgery,pregnancy might be the last thing on your mind. And then if no one mentions the possibility or the contraceptives... :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
10. Hate blacks? Become a nurse or doctor, and refuse to treat blacks.
Hate whites? See above.

Hate Catholics? See above.

Hate Dems? See above.

Hate ...well, you get the picture. We all gotta "follow our conscience", after all!

USA; the nation that used to hold such great promise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC