Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Whistleblower Assists Larisa Alexandrovna Investigation Into GA Diebold Patch (Max Cleland Election)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 07:43 PM
Original message
Whistleblower Assists Larisa Alexandrovna Investigation Into GA Diebold Patch (Max Cleland Election)
Edited on Wed Jul-30-08 07:50 PM by Hissyspit
Here's the thread in Latest Breaking News: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=3416547&mesg_id=3416547

Documents show Georgia's Secretary of State knew of Diebold patch
Larisa Alexandrovna
Published: Wednesday July 30, 2008

Georgia complained to Diebold about patch after election

On Dec. 3, 2002, Georgia Secretary of State Cathy Cox’s office faxed documents to the then-president of Diebold Election Systems Bob Urosevich listing a series of issues that occurred shortly before the November 2002 election.

Documents provided to RAW STORY by a whistleblower close to Cox’s office show that one of the key problems Georgia officials were trying to resolve was related to an unauthorized patch installed on machines prior to the election.

In one document, Cox’s office asked Urosevich for confirmation that a “0808 patch was applied to all systems; confirmation that the patch was not grounds for requiring the system to be recertified at national and state level; as well as verifiable analysis of the overall impact of the patch to the voting system” (See attached pdf, p. 3) Cox didn’t know prior to the election that a patch had been installed, the source said. Cox, who is now president of Young Harris College in Georgia, returned phone calls but could not be reached for comment by press time.

“People working for Diebold were told to keep this quiet so Cox would not find out,” the whistleblower said. “They knew she was in over her head and had come to completely rely on Diebold. They controlled the warehouse, the machines, and the certification. There were no state employees.”

- snip -

According to this individual, this was the patch that he then passed on to cyber-security expert Stephen Spoonamore. Spoonamore, a highly regarded computer security specialist who has worked for US government agencies, has since come forward claiming that he took the Diebold patch to the Department of Justice -- specifically to the Cyber-Security/Cyber-Crime unit of the Computer and Intellectual Property Section -- after it was brought to his attention.

Calls to the Department of Justice seeking confirmation that Spoonamore had delivered the Diebold patch were not returned.

Initially, the whistleblower said, there were no concerns or questions regarding the $54 million contract, for which Diebold beat out eight other firms, to install a statewide electronic voting system. It was only after certain “red flag” events occurred that people inside the Secretary of State’s office, as well as Diebold employees, began to have suspicions, he added.

What initially raised questions, according to the source, was the behavior of then-Diebold CEO, Bob Urosevich, who personally flew in from Texas and applied the patch in just two counties, DeKalb and Fulton, both Democratic strongholds.

Another flag went up, this person added, when it became apparent that the patch installed by Urosevich had failed to fix a problem with the computer clock -- which employees from Diebold and the Georgia Secretary of State’s office had been told the patch was designed specifically to address.

- snip -

Questions raised about race and Diebold terminals

During the period between the election and the faxing of the documents to Diebold by Cox's office on December 3, critics of electronic voting had begun to raise questions about the Georgia race.

Incumbent Democratic Sen. Max Cleland, who was five percentage points ahead of Republican challenger Saxby Chambliss in polls taken only a week before the voting, lost 53 percent to 46 percent. Roy Barnes, the incumbent Democratic Governor, who had been leading challenger Sonny Perdue by a fairly wide margin of eleven points, lost 51 percent to 46 percent.

MORE AT LINK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. I remember when Bev posted the URL of that data here ...
Hmmm ... what was the name of the patch ? .... It's been a while ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. see my comment below...
the whistle-blower does not know, only Urosevich (and if allegations are true, DOJ) what the patch that he installed was in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. and possibly a programmer or two in his company that created
the patch. It's unlike that the CEO wrote it himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. no, i don't think anyone said he did...
the allegation as far as I was told and verified is that he flew in - which is unheard of given his position - to install the patchs... we don't know who wrote them, but what we now know is the number of the patch in question 0808
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. rob-georgia
Or something to that effect.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alstephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Please, folks, we can't let them steal another one!
These funky polls showing a "neck to neck" race between McSame and Obama are setting us up big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Can they steal a landslide?
I guess they can. sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. As long as they can depend on the Democrats not doing
or even saying anything about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
48. I actually think that they're desperate enough to try.
Under normal circumstances they might not be willing to try to upset a landslide, it would be too obvious. But given the stakes - possible criminal prosecutions if they lose - they may be willing to take just about any risk to keep a Republican in the White House.

They've worked too hard for too many decades to give it all up now. At this point I think that they're willing to go for broke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
47. What you said!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetaTrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
50. Is any independent polling being conducted
Surely there must be some academic researchers conducting their own surveys?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadmessengers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wait a minute...
since when does a CEO fly in to apply patches? That's just bizarre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jazzgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Lala, didn't he also fly to Ohio and do the same thing?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. The stuff I covered in OH
were the stickers on the ballots placed over Kerry/Edwards bubble in Clermont. I don't know about the other stuff. That said, I have been told and I have read some vague references, but do not yet know for sure that Urosevich appears to have done this dance in Maryland and Alabama. Again, I don't know this for sure, but as to Ohio, I honestly don't know at all. Boy, would be nice if there were more journalists on this, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Journalists nowadays are too busy belching out corporate gas.
They must feel proud about being an anus for Corporate Media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #13
37. Georgia 2002 was 100% Diebold, Ohio 2004 was 75% punch cards
When OH switched to Diebold, the state swung back to the Dems!! Ironic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Maybe, maybe not. In a lot of small technology companies the CEO is also the boss engineer.
I don't know how big Diebold Election Systems is/was, but it's not unheard of for upper level company guys to deal personally with technical issues if they're among the people who created the systems. Not defending Diebold, but just saying it's not quite as unusual as all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. the company is not that small
it is part of a bigger company called Diebold, Diebold elections is smaller, but they are not that small if you consider the amount of work they had to do in each state they were contracted in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ahh, the RobGA patch.
Edited on Wed Jul-30-08 08:16 PM by tkmorris
That is the one isn't it?

On edit: Perhaps there are a few things I should not admit to on a public forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. we don't know if that
is the patch that Urosevich installed. no one but he knows... all we have is the patch number, 0808
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Ah yes .... That was the one ....
Edited on Wed Jul-30-08 08:39 PM by Trajan
Though, just as you said, it must have been something I read from someone else, since I wouldn't personally visit any old website linked by somebody somewhere ...

It is so long ago, my memory is hazy ..... They said there were LOTS of files on a Diebold website, just sitting there for the downloading ... some files like that, named 'RobGA' ... just sitting there, available for someone to open and analyze ....

But hey .... I just read about it .....

RobGA ... that was merely one .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. right... it is important
not to jump to conclusions as we do not know if what they call patch 0808 is what is publicly known as patch RobGA. we also do not know if the CEO had a whole other patch that was supposed to fix the clock as well (cover story). but if RobGA had been installed prior, then why did he - ceo - need to fly in? so at this point I think we should just stick to calling the patch taken by whistleblower and handed off to Spoonamore, who then took it to DOJ as patch 0808
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #9
38. The stuff in plain view on the Dieold website may be less than trustworthy
since they placed it in plain view for everyone and anyone to see!!

There could be some cover-up at work. This needs inquiry before any conclusions are drawn.

Does Google crawl FTP folders?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. that is an excellent point...
i had not thought of that. interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. It would explain why they named the file "Rob Georgia" eh!
There are a lot of Republicans showing up for the election fraud party all of a sudden.

Are they at this circus to make more smoke, to distract
the crowd from the unseen hand at the magic box show?

Small coincidence?
A major motion picture on 2004 election fraud premieres in NYC tomorrow!!

Stealing America: Vote By Vote
(Selected scenes)
www.stealingamericathemovie.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norrin Radd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. kr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. here's a post form 2003
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Thanks ....
I have lost all my 2002 bookmarks ...

I am guessing everyone did .... damn .... some goodies there ....

Stephanie's PNAC thread comes to mind .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. okay, one more time and for good measure...
we do not know if RobGA is patch 0808. the latter is the patch we know has taken by source to GOP expert Spoonamore who in turn took it to DOJ. we don't know if 0808 is RobGA, and confusing the two is going to hijack the conversation and make it seem that RobGA is in fact 0808. We do not know this, so please don't confuse the information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. LMFAO ...
OK ... I think it is clear ....

There is no direct correlation between a file named '0808' and 'Rob-Georgia' or 'RobGA' ...

That is absolutely, definitely and completely clear ....

Thanks ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. why is this funny?
I am trying to make clear that for the sake of determining chain of custody, we can ONLY say for sure that patch 0808 was the item delivered from source to Spoonamore to DOJ. You may speculate Is this or IS this not RobGA patch, but please be clear that you are not saying it is or claiming it is. Because what I have found is that whenever there is any credible evidence relating to this topic, people seem to have an interest in confusing things. I am not saying you are, but I have seen this enough to know that such tactics or errors should be corrected right away so that they are not used to confuse the conversation overall. If that is funny to you, great, glad I made your day
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. It is not funny, Lala. Thank you for your work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. :)
thank you kind sir
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. It is 'funny' because ....
You have planted posts throughout this thread about how THIS file is not THAT file ...

Yes ... we get it ...

You have made it abundantly clear ...

More than abundantly clear ....

THAT is why it is funny ... because here you are, doing it again ....

Now .... Let's make this clear : I COMPLETELY agree with you ... I agree with what you are doing ...

Chain of Custody is something that was discussed in 2002, WITH she who will not be named ....

I discussed it with her, AND others .... at that very moment : That was the problem .. there was (and is) no accounting of WHAT is being loaded into voting machines ....

We bring up 'Rob Georgia' only because of it's relationship to the election event, in it's time and locale, NOT to confuse others that '0808' is EXACTLY the same file as 'Rob-Georgia' ... in fact: There is no direct implication by me or anyone else here that this is so ....

So ... please .. by all means ... continue your quest to reveal the truth ... I am behind you ONE HUNDRED PERCENT !

But .. I swear: If you again say we are confusing the two different files; I am going to bust a fucking gut in outright hilarity ....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. So when TKmorris says
"Ahh the Rob Georgia patch...
"that is the one isn't it?"

and you say "that's the one" you are saying that you are only bringing it up in "relation to the election event?"

interesting. i must have a comprehension problem because the "is this" and "yes it is" sure sounds a great deal like this=that. you are right, it is funny, that is to say, your argument and the fact that we can scroll up and see what you said in this thread as well as the other thread about this story. very funny indeed actually
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. We were referring to files that were displayed THEN....
NOT that which were revealed TODAY .....

PLEASE re-read ..... Twas Rob-Georgia that was discovered THEN ..... in 2002 ....

Hey .. Maybe I am plumb fucking nuts and have no idea WTF I am talking about ....

Shrugs .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #26
39. For years and years now smoke screens have been laid down
and it is important to be very critical of any information.
Even leading activists can be misled by all he disinformation and misdirection.

I would not even trust that the patch delivered from source to Spoonamore to DOJ is in fact "the patch" that went onto the computers unless there was evidence to back it up. What better way to cover up the crime than to misinform about the patch?

What we know boils down to this:

Only the two counties with over 50% of the Georgia Dem votes got this one illegal patch just before the 2002 vote.

I believe you can watch the informant relate this info on the BIG SCREEN tomorrow in NYC, when Stealing America premieres!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. Sorry about that lala
I fear I introduced that little assumption into the conversation. It was not my intention to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. not your fault...
you were asking a question:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
17. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
30. Kick
:kick:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
34. Anyone know the outcome of the DeKalb and Fulton County elections
after the patch was installed that year?

And is Cox a republican?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #34
40. Here they are. Note how many counties there are
UNITED STATES SENATOR

100 % of precincts reporting
PR=Precincts Reporting
TP=Total Precincts

CLELAND CHAMBLISS THOMAS
(D) (R) (Lib)
931,857 1,071,153 26,981
45.9% 52.8% 1.3%
County PR TP
APPLING 19 19 1,699 2,793 58
ATKINSON 6 6 565 982 29
BACON 7 7 920 1,536 22
BAKER 7 7 630 414 10
BALDWIN 16 16 4,958 4,556 91
BANKS 15 15 1,268 2,232 52
BARROW 15 15 3,220 6,287 185
BARTOW 17 17 6,784 11,012 343
BEN HILL 6 6 1,858 1,803 50
BERRIEN 11 11 1,574 1,976 57
BIBB 52 52 20,356 19,151 288
BLECKLEY 3 3 1,139 2,125 32
BRANTLEY 11 11 1,147 2,087 62
BROOKS 11 11 1,506 1,403 43
BRYAN 11 11 2,013 3,611 65
BULLOCH 16 16 5,052 6,881 110
BURKE 17 17 3,014 2,576 67
BUTTS 12 12 2,011 2,705 51
CALHOUN 7 7 919 538 9
CAMDEN 14 14 3,258 4,069 127
CANDLER 4 4 918 1,067 31
CARROLL 32 32 8,031 12,426 328
CATOOSA 14 14 4,518 7,460 165
CHARLTON 10 10 617 1,143 17
CHATHAM 110 110 30,840 27,927 547
CHATTAHOOCHEE 3 3 383 291 13
CHATTOOGA 15 15 2,161 2,277 68
CHEROKEE 46 46 10,828 30,211 699
CLARKE 24 24 12,809 8,638 359
CLAY 7 7 611 268 14
CLAYTON 52 52 30,760 12,635 656
CLINCH 9 9 510 733 12
COBB 180 180 69,082 105,750 2,791
COFFEE 8 8 3,098 4,661 94
COLQUITT 21 21 2,844 5,146 74
COLUMBIA 39 39 8,333 20,015 235
COOK 10 10 1,418 1,557 28
COWETA 30 30 8,067 16,665 306
CRAWFORD 8 8 1,186 1,690 26
CRISP 8 8 2,044 2,576 50
DADE 9 9 1,253 1,952 54
DAWSON 10 10 1,349 3,595 111
DECATUR 16 16 2,777 2,627 78
DEKALB 186 186 123,747 44,759 2,339
DODGE 18 18 1,826 2,742 53
DOOLY 8 8 1,407 1,324 28
DOUGHERTY 33 33 14,066 8,834 142
DOUGLAS 20 20 9,306 13,536 331
EARLY 13 13 1,400 1,226 26
ECHOLS 3 3 251 337 7
EFFINGHAM 20 20 3,945 7,162 133
ELBERT 13 13 2,460 2,191 62
EMANUEL 16 16 2,256 2,547 59
EVANS 12 12 1,109 1,209 33
FANNIN 13 13 2,576 4,052 134
FAYETTE 38 38 11,364 22,092 396
FLOYD 27 27 9,379 11,824 336
FORSYTH 29 29 6,976 25,336 500
FRANKLIN 15 15 2,163 2,431 70
FULTON 330 330 117,859 81,441 2,513
GILMER 15 15 2,056 3,869 100
GLASCOCK 6 6 231 426 5
GLYNN 34 34 6,294 10,720 180
GORDON 16 16 3,810 5,845 156
GRADY 15 15 2,812 2,170 42
GREENE 10 10 1,990 2,559 40
GWINNETT 139 139 49,093 91,604 2,479
HABERSHAM 16 16 2,719 5,342 119
HALL 40 40 8,859 21,029 415
HANCOCK 9 9 1,714 481 33
HARALSON 15 15 3,001 4,055 131
HARRIS 14 14 2,715 4,050 84
HART 9 9 3,269 2,841 86
HEARD 11 11 1,161 1,291 53
HENRY 25 25 12,440 21,552 518
HOUSTON 30 30 10,856 19,109 257
IRWIN 12 12 1,157 1,409 36
JACKSON 16 16 2,939 6,026 132
JASPER 9 9 1,279 1,754 42
JEFF DAVIS 11 11 1,234 2,099 53
JEFFERSON 10 10 2,526 1,786 34
JENKINS 7 7 1,032 1,052 28
JOHNSON 14 14 836 1,318 20
JONES 11 11 2,794 3,914 68
LAMAR 8 8 1,989 2,309 59
LANIER 5 5 606 723 23
LAURENS 23 23 4,821 6,643 114
LEE 12 12 1,982 4,281 56
LIBERTY 15 15 4,442 2,813 80
LINCOLN 8 8 1,054 1,178 30
LONG 7 7 831 823 22
LOWNDES 34 34 8,194 9,992 185
LUMPKIN 17 17 1,798 3,254 103
MACON 7 7 2,251 1,293 41
MADISON 14 14 2,012 3,950 95
MARION 9 9 1,022 850 30
MCDUFFIE 12 12 1,965 2,529 50
MCINTOSH 9 9 1,934 1,305 53
MERIWETHER 16 16 3,037 2,306 77
MILLER 3 3 627 744 23
MITCHELL 13 13 2,727 2,086 43
MONROE 16 16 2,663 4,083 71
MONTGOMERY 9 9 820 1,265 18
MORGAN 12 12 1,921 2,839 65
MURRAY 9 9 2,449 3,689 134
MUSCOGEE 50 50 21,581 15,269 351
NEWTON 22 22 6,454 8,937 229
OCONEE 16 16 3,418 6,821 145
OGLETHORPE 12 12 1,381 1,954 60
PAULDING 23 23 6,372 13,890 311
PEACH 9 9 2,734 2,878 54
PICKENS 14 14 2,095 4,196 88
PIERCE 10 10 1,091 2,945 31
PIKE 10 10 1,419 2,686 43
POLK 13 13 3,954 4,526 151
PULASKI 8 8 1,011 1,439 19
PUTNAM 8 8 2,137 2,981 58
QUITMAN 4 4 374 182 9
RABUN 11 11 1,992 2,468 80
RANDOLPH 11 11 1,397 710 24
RICHMOND 73 73 27,929 19,275 505
ROCKDALE 18 18 7,690 11,422 314
SCHLEY 3 3 368 567 9
SCREVEN 15 15 2,035 1,905 49
SEMINOLE 7 7 1,083 900 25
SPALDING 19 19 5,203 7,356 150
STEPHENS 10 10 2,419 3,451 86
STEWART 6 6 816 370 20
SUMTER 11 11 3,972 3,453 72
TALBOT 10 10 1,394 598 30
TALIAFERRO 4 4 363 182 10
TATTNALL 17 17 2,051 2,482 56
TAYLOR 8 8 1,174 1,118 9
TELFAIR 8 8 1,321 1,368 30
TERRELL 8 8 1,517 1,135 27
THOMAS 22 22 4,715 5,017 104
TIFT 14 14 2,898 4,802 69
TOOMBS 16 16 2,262 3,865 69
TOWNS 6 6 1,335 1,880 38
TREUTLEN 8 8 726 842 15
TROUP 18 18 5,295 7,369 126
TURNER 5 5 958 996 13
TWIGGS 12 12 1,640 1,279 43
UNION 13 13 2,183 3,327 95
UPSON 12 12 2,848 3,838 77
WALKER 20 20 5,072 7,527 195
WALTON 21 21 4,992 10,672 249
WARE 13 13 2,505 4,939 62
WARREN 8 8 925 681 21
WASHINGTON 10 10 2,776 2,339 56
WAYNE 17 17 2,750 3,583 69
WEBSTER 6 6 444 289 7
WHEELER 5 5 608 746 8
WHITE 13 13 2,104 3,821 72
WHITFIELD 25 25 5,467 10,696 239
WILCOX 8 8 875 1,121 15
WILKES 9 9 1,715 1,527 42
WILKINSON 11 11 1,633 1,279 34
WORTH 18 18 2,006 2,908 66
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellipsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
35. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
41. OBAMA IS GOING TO LOSE
And the blame will lie with traitors like Pelosi who refuse to confront and convict felons like Rove. These thefts will continue because there is never any repercussions to the perpetrators. We no longer live in a democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
43. OBAMA IS GOING TO WIN BECAUSE WE WILL MAKE SURE IT IS A LANDSLIDE n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
44. kick
I did the "R" last night.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Bozita, what's the "R"? Why not the "D"? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. The "R" is from "K&R" ... I recommended this thread last night without posting a comment.
Sometimes I confuse myself too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC