Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ding, dong! The ANWR oil drilling is dead! Ding Dong! The ANWR oil drilling is dead!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 02:26 PM
Original message
Ding, dong! The ANWR oil drilling is dead! Ding Dong! The ANWR oil drilling is dead!
I think with the indictment, no Republicans are going to touch this with a 20-foot pole. So the pristine wilderness of Alaska will remain safe for a few more years!

:salute: Alaska!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. even if it were opened, oil companies dont want to touch it. they like 4$ gas
they dont want to drill anymore anywhere, they are enjoying making huge profits
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenman3610 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. your statement presumes that the drilling would make gas cheaper
which is incorrect.
Let's not feed the right winger's memes for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. the export ban on Alaska oil was lifted in 1995
so they could sell the oil to China, Korea, and Japan and not affect domestic supply anyway. They are only patriotic and loyal to their bottom line, not the good of the US or its citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. I hope so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. There are many other locations in Alaska that are open for
Oil drilling but the Oil Corps. have no interest in those. It's all BS by the Busholini Regime & their Oil Corp. friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Actually, the Democrat running against him supports drilling in ANWAR:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Raindog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Of course support for drilling is bipartisan in Alaska
They're all whores for those free royalty checks Alaskans have been getting for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. True, but Stevens was one of the primary proponents of ANWR drilling in the Senate...
And the fact that the oil executives were paying off one of the primary proponents of ANWR drilling is going to make people a bit squeamish. Begich may support drilling as well, but he is not going to be nearly as dangerous as Stevens was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Whomever replaces Stevens will become a primary proponent of ANWR drilling,
along with Lisa Murkowski. It's kind of like being a Senator from Iowa and supporting subsidies for ethanol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Whoever replaces Stevens won't have the seniority to really push the issue though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Stevens apparently didn't have the seniority to push it through
He has failed again, and again, and again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Now what does it take to protect the beaches?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Perhaps it's time for citizens to start tossing some of that black crude on
certain people's sidewalks, front lawns, gates, doorknobs, expensive landscaping, spend $140 on a barrel of the stuff and do some pipe repairs like reconnecting the main plumbing to that barrel of oil..........

I've got loads of ideas, lots of dark clothing and some really quiet shoes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. I hope so-it will be final if they get rid of Murkowski as well
But you geta rec anyway since this makes me so happy :D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. I don't see why the indictment would stop them. But I certainly hope
you are right for the animals' sakes!
(What I mean, is it is in Bush, Cheney's interest. The indicted one was a bit player.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC