Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Greg Palast-BOMBSHELL-Bush's New US Attorney Is A CRIMINAL (Behind Scheme To Wipe Out Votes)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 10:19 AM
Original message
Greg Palast-BOMBSHELL-Bush's New US Attorney Is A CRIMINAL (Behind Scheme To Wipe Out Votes)
Edited on Wed Mar-07-07 10:20 AM by kpete


Bush’s New US Attorney a Criminal?
Published March 7th, 2007 in Articles
BBC Television had exposed 2004 voter attack scheme
by appointee Griffin, a Rove aide.
Black soldiers and the homeless targeted.
by Greg Palast

March 7, 2007.

There’s only one thing worse than sacking an honest prosecutor. That’s replacing an honest prosecutor with a criminal.

But the Committee missed a big one: Timothy Griffin, Karl Rove’s assistant, the President’s pick as US Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Griffin, according to BBC Television, was the hidden hand behind a scheme to wipe out the voting rights of 70,000 citizens prior to the 2004 election.

...............

Timothy Griffin, Karl Rove’s assistant, the President’s pick as US Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Griffin, according to BBC Television, was the hidden hand behind a scheme to wipe out the voting rights of 70,000 citizens prior to the 2004 election.

Key voters on Griffin’s hit list: Black soldiers and homeless men and women. Nice guy, eh? Naughty or nice, however, is not the issue. Targeting voters where race is a factor is a felony crime under the Voting Rights Act of 1965.


.........................

Much Much more at:
http://www.gregpalast.com/bushs-new-us-attorney-a-criminal/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. A felony under the Voting Rights Act
Well, I'm sure that Alberto Gonzales will get right on this case.

Thanks again, Sen. Specter, for your self-writing legislation that made all this possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LonelyLRLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. Specter was an ASS in the hearings ---
I saw some of his "questioning" of the US Attorneys yesterday, and he made me sick. In fact, all of the Pukes I heard were disgusting in their attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm not suprised. Most Repubes are criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. So, is someone gonna prosecute this?
Maybe at least a Congressional investigation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Maybe we should ask Mr. Conyers? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Naivete is so cute
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. In which case Palast's bombshell has no fuze.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. It's not new information or, not that I can see anyway.
We knew shortly after the election what these @ssholes did to black voters, to students, to military voters.

But, it's good to see that Greg has a new chapter out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. The Griffin-as-US Atty/Criminal part is sorta new.
It could become an interesting story if anyone wants to make something of it. Somebody whose initials are Henry Waxman, for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. That's true. Poor Waxman must be pretty much inundated
with BushCo crime to deal with. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
naboo Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Let's see how they cover this up
If it "disappears" we will know just how corrupt the corporate media is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
30. This won't even "appear" in the mainstream media in the first place...
Edited on Wed Mar-07-07 03:52 PM by mikelewis
...They cover it up by ignoring it even exists and then if it should pop up on radar... they'll run it along the bottom of the screen while a talking head discusses the latest American distraction. This story is going no where... truth is way too controversial and it damn sure doesn't sell commercials.


on edit...
welcome to DU... which was actually the original reason for my reply
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is what happens when you let anti social behavior skate.
You wind up with criminals in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
37. It's true. And it'll happen every time.
With that in mind...impeach, indict, imprison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. Well, now Europe knows...I hope America hears about it before 2008
Sorry, but I dont have a lot of faith in the MSM.. especially when it concerns more "bad" news for the Dick and his Shrub.

Do you think this story will have "legs"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. This may be the scandal that buries Bush. K&R,
You fuck with around at this deep of a level and you will arouse the ire of not just those on our side, but true patriots and freedom lovers on the other side as well.

This may be the one to do him in. The timing is certainly right coming on the heels/simulateous with Libbygate.

Let's hope so.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
34. "true patriots and freedom lovers on the other side"
Have you seen any of those lately?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
11. Key target: black soldiers. Republicons after honorable vets again.
Edited on Wed Mar-07-07 10:32 AM by SpiralHawk
Why do the republicons HATE the men and women who have actually served America with honor?

Is it because so many republicons are cowardly chickenhawks who quiver in shame that it will be widely known that they have never served America for even one day?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
12. Per this, his nomination was pulled:

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppr... /

Did White House Pull Nomination To Avoid Questions Over 2004 Minority Voter Suppression? «

Tim Griffin — a “37-year-old protege” of Karl Rove and the former research director of the Republican National Committee — has become the poster boy for the Bush administration’s politicization of the office of U.S. attorney.

On Feb. 15, Griffin suddenly announced that he had “made the decision not to let my name go forward to the Senate” for approval. Instead, he will serve indefinitely as an “interim” prosecutor. By avoiding Senate approval, Griffin will also avoid having to answer questions under oath about his role in a plan to supress Florida votes — primarily those of African-American servicemembers — in the 2004 election. From the LA Times, 10/28/04:

The Bush campaign is planning an election day effort to disrupt ballot casting by African Americans by challenging voters whose names are on a “caging list,” according to a British news report.

Citing an internal GOP e-mail with the subject line “caging,” the BBC reported Tuesday that Florida Republicans had a list of 1,886 names and addresses of voters in largely black and traditionally Democratic areas of Jacksonville. …

But African American leaders Wednesday called the list another “shameful” Republican effort to keep blacks from voting.

Yesterday, the public radio station KUAR in Arkansas aired an interview with Griffin, in which he denied involvement in this scheme. He called the report “patently false.”

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN TO GRIFFIN (go to link)

Congressional sources tell ThinkProgress that the White House has decided not to proceed with the Griffin nomination because it would bring up questions about the 2000 caging scheme. If Griffin wasn’t involved, he should say that under oath. Congress and the public deserve the opportunity to question a U.S. attorney about his possible role in suppressing minority voters.

Transcript:

RON BREEDING, KUAR HOST: Well, Mr. Griffin, if I may interrupt. One of the specific things that has been talked about — I know you worked on campaigns, but it’s been alleged you were involved in voter suppression efforts and that sort of thing. Can you speak to the types of work you did on campaigns?

TIM GRIFFIN, U.S. ATTORNEY: Sure. I was — First of all, the allegations of voter suppression, or whatever you were referring to, I’m intimately familiar with those allegations. That is a web article on the Internet. It is patently false. I have told Sen. Pryor it was patently false. I have explained that in detail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. "That was a web article on the Internet." Iirc, this is a way
the BFEE invalidates or minimizes information -- it came up in "9/11 Press for Truth".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
15. Yep, Republicans think 'voting while black' is the real crime n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Actually they think voting itself isn't worth having anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
32. Reminds me of the Molly Ivins quote: "(Republicans) don't want to govern; they want to rule"
Edited on Wed Mar-07-07 04:02 PM by KansDem
And you don't have to vote in a system where one person/party rules...

Edited to fix code
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
16. Here's a clue: When we are looking for honest brokers to serve
in public office, never select a man who thinks that the end justifies the means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. I, GOP gangster, do solemnly swear,
That I will faithfully protect my crime family, and will to the best of my ability consolidate our power, preserve the stonewall against justice, protect our profits, and defend the Republican Party's right to rule.

Machiavelli's Oath of Office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
19. Impeach. Indict. Incarcerate.
I'm sure that BushCo will feel quite comfortable in the presence of those he disenfranchised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
20. Pls contact House Judiciary:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
22. This is what you get when there is no confirmation process before congress...
Arlen Specter's Office was responsible for secretly inserting the provision in a bill that Bush signed giving him this power to avoid confirmation hearings before Congress. Now Specter says he did not know about it --but as far as we can tell no one in his office was fired or publicly condemned for doing it.

Specter needs to be raked over the coals for this, and there should be fast-track action to reverse the effect of that provision immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
35. It's worse than Arlen Specter's private legislative session?
We don't know who put it in? It could have been Dick or al-qaeda? Maybe it put itself in. This is outrageous and this privatization of the legislative process should not be tolerated.

Specter should be raked over coals - or water-boarded - to find out who did it. If it was unauthorized it should be investigated.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IWantAChange Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
23. Slowly but surely the Repuke curtain is going to be raised and
they are going to suffer the consequences for decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Gauger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
24. I remember that.
Palast mentions that incident in his latest book. One of the purge lists used by the GOP (I believe in Cleveland) was composed mainly of names from two addresses: a homeless shelter and an Army base. I was shocked by such contempt for democracy, even to go so far as to disenfranchise active military members. These people are truly despicable: imagine being sent to Iraq and then having your vote taken away. These men are already doing something remarkable, by joining the Army after what America has done to the black man (unless they joined because they had no other options. Either possibility makes the voter purge even more despicable.) These are the same people who complained when 16,000 white soldiers had their votes discarded in California four years earlier (due to the Electoral College, their votes were meaningless anyway, but that's beside the point.) I never cease to be astonished what people will do in the name of partisan politics.

And then we have the homeless people. They have already been thrown away, deemed worthless by society. This is just another travail on the long journey of suffering that they endure. Of course, a significant portion of these homeless men are also veterans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
25. Didn't he decline the nomination?
I thought I read he had. :shrug:

*off to find a link*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. From what I gathered during the Hearing yesterday, no
Also part of this is that it's not a nomination in the way that it is voted and approved by the Senate, thanks to Patriot Act. He is appointed and is replacing 'Bud' Cummins in Arkansas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I did a quick look and you are right.
Sadly, I was mistaken :(

I hate this bunch, they just keep perverting the system every way they can.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. babylon sister posted this link earlier:
Did White House Pull Nomination To Avoid Questions Over 2004 Minority Voter Suppression?
Tim Griffin — a “37-year-old protege” of Karl Rove and the former research director of the Republican National Committee — has become the poster boy for the Bush administration’s politicization of the office of U.S. attorney.

On Feb. 15, Griffin suddenly announced that he had “made the decision not to let my name go forward to the Senate” for approval. Instead, he will serve indefinitely as an “interim” prosecutor. By avoiding Senate approval, Griffin will also avoid having to answer questions under oath about his role in a plan to supress Florida votes — primarily those of African-American servicemembers — in the 2004 election. From the LA Times, 10/28/04:

The Bush campaign is planning an election day effort to disrupt ballot casting by African Americans by challenging voters whose names are on a “caging list,” according to a British news report.

Citing an internal GOP e-mail with the subject line “caging,” the BBC reported Tuesday that Florida Republicans had a list of 1,886 names and addresses of voters in largely black and traditionally Democratic areas of Jacksonville. …
-snip

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #33
40. Interesting...this not only got a heads up because of the firings
but because of the Patriot Act change that got "slipped in" to allow Gonzo to just appoint someone without the Senate's approval. :shrug: At this point anyway, looks like he's in the chair but just with the status of interim. It has the same result in terms of 'giving him experience' toward being a judge or future elected official (as Lindsay Graham claims this post is intended to provide).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
31. getting their ducks in a row for the next elections among other things...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Mmmmmm.....duck..... (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
38. Maybe Keith might want to know this. He has a brand new (I hope)
airtight contract and no fear. Please send it to him. I am too computer illiterate to know how.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
39. And Darrell Issa, he's a criminal to. Auto theft I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC