Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WILSONS' ATTORNEY STATEMENT IN RESPONSE TO JURY’S VERDICT IN U.S. V. I. LEWIS “SCOOTER” LIBBY

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:54 PM
Original message
WILSONS' ATTORNEY STATEMENT IN RESPONSE TO JURY’S VERDICT IN U.S. V. I. LEWIS “SCOOTER” LIBBY
WILSONS' ATTORNEY STATEMENT IN RESPONSE TO JURY’S VERDICT IN U.S. V. I. LEWIS “SCOOTER” LIBBY

March 6, 2007

Washington, DC – First, Valerie and Joseph Wilson would like to express their appreciation to Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald and the entire team of federal prosecutors for their professionalism and hard work. Their prosecution of a senior White House official illustrates that we are a nation of laws and that no man is above the law. The Wilsons respect the jury’s verdict and thank the jurors for their service. The entire Wilson team is pleased by today’s verdict and believes that justice has been served in this case.

The Wilsons will continue to pursue the civil case against Vice President Cheney, Mr. Libby, Mr. Rove and Mr. Armitage because it hinges on additional and different facts from those underlying the criminal case. The criminal trial was about whether or not Mr. Libby obstructed justice and committed perjury by lying to FBI agents and the grand jury about the fact that he had disclosed to reporters that Valerie Wilson worked for the CIA. The civil suit, on the other hand, hinges on whether or not the defendants violated the constitutional rights of Valerie and Joe Wilson by making those disclosures in a concerted effort to retaliate against Joe Wilson for revealing the falsity of the president’s rationale for the Iraq war.

Disturbing facts emerged from the criminal trial that are highly relevant to the civil case. For example, the American public learned details of how Vice President Cheney orchestrated the concerted White House effort to discredit and retaliate against Joe Wilson. Towards that end, the vice president enlisted the aid of other senior administration officials including former press secretary Ari Fleischer, vice presidential assistant Cathie Martin and presidential advisor Karl Rove. Testimony in the criminal case also confirmed that Mr. Libby spoke to numerous reporters in an effort to persuade at least one of them to publicly reveal Mrs. Wilson’s covert status.

Melanie Sloan, CREW’s executive director and counsel to the Wilsons stated, “The civil case may provide the American public with its only opportunity to hear directly from Vice President Cheney, Mr. Libby, Mr. Rove and Mr. Armitage about what really took place behind the scenes after Joe Wilson exposed the truth about the administration’s justification for the Iraq war.”

http://www.wilsonsupport.org/node/313

Mods, please delete if this is a dupe. I just thought it's important to remind everyone that Cheney, Rove, Libby, Armitage and 9 other John Does still face a civil suit regarding Valerie Plame's outing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Proud to be the 5th
On to the Greatest page!

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Correct me if I am wrong but
Aren't the rules for witnesses different in a civil case? Could all of those people be forced to testify with supoenas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yes
The Paula Jones case took care of all that, may they rue the day
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsTheMediaStupid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. May the persecution of Bill Clinton bite them in their collective asses
And hang on like a pit bull.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 04:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. Historical viewpoint.
Edited on Wed Mar-07-07 04:53 AM by Virginian
edited to finish because I timed out in an earlier attempt to post.

In 20 years I hope history views the Impeachment of Clinton as an early strike by the neo-cons before they were able to seize control of our government and install their puppet. Jeb probably regrets that his brother was the one installed as puppet because it has hurt his own political future.

Jeb (the smart one) has not renounced PNAC and its plan for world domination. He has a lot of time on his hands these days. Don't let him fly below the radar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Oh yeah! That was a nice Pandora's Box they opened!
Remember that old meme "It's about the lies!" Why aren't those reich-wingers screaming about all the lies now?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. I think you are correct. I don't think a witness is allowed to plead
the Fifth in civil cases. But, IANAL, so perhaps someone will correct me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Yes and no
Your right not to be compelled to testify against yourself is absolute, in civil or criminal cases; it's just that in a civil case you're not criminally liable so there's a broader scope of what you can be compelled to talk about. But you still can't compel someone to say "I killed him" or whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Paula Jones surely seemed to be able to compel anybody, at will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good Day, Eh, RP
When you think that the old Plame threads started in July 2004, this has been a long time coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Things are so good, they're GRRRREAT!
So great to see justice served.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thank you! I'd forgotten about the civil suit.
Well, I've had a lot on my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. Has their been any date set
for the start of the trial?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. I don't believe an exact date has been set.
I think they are hoping to start sometime before 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. K and a Big R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Awesome
:woohoo: Justice continues
Cheney will pay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bear425 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. From your post...
Edited on Tue Mar-06-07 03:01 PM by bear425
The Wilsons will continue to pursue the civil case against Vice President Cheney, Mr. Libby, Mr. Rove and Mr. Armitage because it hinges on additional and different facts from those underlying the criminal case.

Could these additional and different facts be the ones Prosecutor Fitzgerald mentioned he would need in order to pursue further investigation? I certainly hope so. While the Libby verdict is satisfying, it lacks justice for the initial perp.

edit: darned html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. That might explain why Fitz said "inactive" rather than "closed".
The civil case may bring additional facts to light. Then again, facing a long prison stay, Libby may have some additional facts that he set aside for a rainy day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. K&R. Thanks to Ms. Paula Jones,
this is all possible. :applause: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
19. Joe and Valerie coming up on KO in 10 minutes (8 PM EST)
This should be good.

I just listened to a rightwinger insist loud and long that Scooter had done nothing wrong. It's been going on all day. No lie to outrageous for those folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terip64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
20. kick and recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC