Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Addington: Vice President Isn’t Part Of Executive Branch, ‘Attached’ To Legislative

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 02:18 PM
Original message
Addington: Vice President Isn’t Part Of Executive Branch, ‘Attached’ To Legislative
from ThinkProgress:



Addington: Vice President Isn’t Part Of Executive Branch, ‘Attached’ To Legislative»

In a protracted battle with the National Archives last year, Vice President Dick Cheney sought to avoid submitting records to the archives by claiming that the office of the vice president is not part of the executive branch. During today’s House Judiciary Committee hearing, Cheney’s chief of staff David Addington reasserted that position, declaring the vice president’s office to be a separate entity that “attached” to the legislative branch:

REP. STEVE COHEN (D-TN): Mr. Addington, what branch are we in?

ADDINGTON: Sir, perhaps the best that can be said is that the vice president belongs neither to the executive nor to the legislative branch, but is attached by the constitution to the latter. (…)

COHEN: So he’s a member of the legislative branch?

ADDINGTON: No I said he’s attached to the latter.


Watch it: http://thinkprogress.org/2008/06/26/addington-executive-branch/


The assertion is ridiculous. President Bush and Cheney have themselves repeatedly tied the office of the President and Vice President together in the executive branch, not to mention the White House and the Senate websites. In fact, there is video showing Cheney lauding the strength of the vice presidency, asserting that “the vice president’s become an important part of the administration of the executive branch“:

http://thinkprogress.org/2008/06/26/addington-executive-branch/


In fact, in 2001 Cheney sought to avoid a lawsuit over his energy task force by claiming that a congressional probe “would unconstitutionally interfere with the functioning of the executive branch.”

Despite Politico’s Mike Allen’s claim last June that Addington and Cheney were “throwing in the towel on the claim that the vice president is distinct from the executive branch,” the next month Cheney continued to insist that the Vice President’s office is a “unique creature.”


http://thinkprogress.org/2008/06/26/addington-executive-branch/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hey works for me. no more executive priviledge. gimme the energy meeting notes!
and I would love to read cheney's emails to his staff, wouldn't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I would love to be invisible, just a dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. If Cheney is attatched to the legislative branch
He should be subject to rules established by the legislative branch for itself, i.e., rules (including ethics rules) of the Senate ... and subject to investigation by that body
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. exactly... they try to have it both ways
slippery slime that they are
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. It is really quite simple.
When stonewalling legislative inquiries, such as the secret planning for the conquest of the middle east prior to 9-11 and the actual invasion, the vp is part of the executive and the executive invokes executive privilege. When it comes to the archiving requirements, which would expose the cabal to criminal prosecution after they flee washington this january, the vp is part of the legislative branch.

It is really quite simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. The House could Impeach this VP but they don't have the
spine to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC