Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush: Dems Should Worry More About bin Laden than heed demands of MoveOn and Code Pink

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 09:24 AM
Original message
Bush: Dems Should Worry More About bin Laden than heed demands of MoveOn and Code Pink
Edited on Thu Jun-26-08 09:25 AM by marmar
Oh, the gall! :argh:


via MichaelMoore.com:



June 26th, 2008 1:51 am
Bush raises GOP cash in Michigan


By Jennifer Loven / Associated Press

LIVONIA, Mich. — Campaigning for fellow Republican John McCain in a crucial swing state, President Bush accused Democrats Wednesday of "running on empty" on energy policy, "acting like teenagers with a new credit card" on federal spending and heeding warnings from anti-war activists more than those from Osama bin Laden.

Bush never mentioned the name of McCain's opponent in the November race to succeed him. But his criticism of Democratic leadership clearly was meant to include Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill.

The speech, before a group of about 300 supporters raising money for the state Republican Party, came as Bush is significantly stepping up his efforts — both public and private — on McCain's behalf.

Though the two hardly appear together, Bush has pledged his full support to help get his former foe elected. McCain unsuccessfully ran against Bush in a bitter race for the Republican nomination in 2000. They eventually made up and McCain backed Bush the rest of that year and again in his 2004 re-election bid.

Most of Bush's appearances so far this year for McCain have come at GOP fundraisers that are closed to the media. But that is starting to change.

In Wednesday's speech, like one in the Washington Convention Center last week, Bush mentioned McCain on every topic he raised, such as taxes, spending, energy, judges, Iraq and the war on terror.

But he also cranked his standard political stump speech up a few notches, adding several sharp punch lines aimed at Democrats.

On Iraq and the war on terror, he said "Democratic leaders should pay more attention to the warnings of terrorists like Osama bin Laden and spend less time heeding the demands of MoveOn.Org and Code Pink."

On energy, he suggested he is the only policymaker to make proposals that would lower gas prices and that Democrats "have rejected virtually all of them."

"They say they want lower prices at the pump, but they're against measures that would actually do that," Bush said. "You might say when it comes to energy policy, the Democrats in Congress are running on empty." .....(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/latestnews/index.php?id=11751




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Spoken like a man who thinks he is king.
He sees the world that way. Americans are dumb followers, not citizens. It couldn't be that MoveOn and Code Pink are organic organizations that grew up as an expression of the outrage at his war crimes and traitorous behavior. It must be that Democrats are just obeying the wrong king.

Well, in a few months he can retire somewhere, and no one will care what he says or does until he dies of whatever drugs or alcohol he's using then. I wonder if his kids will even mourn him. I doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Cope Pink and Move on
must be more effective than we think if they merit mention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. True dat. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. This morning Lindsay "Jackass" Graham said the Hard Left
was going crazy over the FISA bill. "Hard Left special interests". It seems like a way to shut down dissent more than anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Remember these quotes from Bush:
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02

"I am truly not that concerned about him."
- G.W. Bush, repsonding to a question about bin Laden's whereabouts,
3/13/02 (The New American, 4/8/02)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. CodePink wants you to stand trial for war crimes, Mr. President
Don't let that influence your opinion of them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. Would somebody please point out that he and his Republican Congress doubled the national debt!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. So we should not listen to the voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. Is this the same Bush who publicly stated
that he wasn't looking for Bin Laden.

Benazir Bhutto said to Frost than Bin Laden was dead. Then she was dead. Then McSame's peeps said that her death was good for him. They're playing up the fear factor - here we go again. :tinfoilhat: :tinfoilhat:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. McLame must not be trying to win anymore.
Edited on Thu Jun-26-08 09:53 AM by Lasher
Getting the most unpopular president since Truman to campaign for him does not seem prudent.

So Democrats aren't concerned about bin Laden? Who was president when we took our eye off the ball in Tora Bora? Well OK it was Cheney.

And this is the same guy who was critical of Clinton for the 'high' gas prices in 2000. Said he would 'jawbone' the Saudis to lower prices. Now he seems to have forgotten he's been president since January 22, 2001 when gas was $1.46 a gallon.

And it's Democrats who are going to max out the federal credit cards? Well that mission has already been accomplished. During Junior's presidency spending increased at the fastest rate in 30 years.



http://www.independent.org/newsroom/news_detail.asp?newsID=31
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
9. Good, the more Bush opens his big fat mouth to support McCain,
the more galvanized WE get.

Let's tie Bush around McCain and every other Repuke pig LIKE AN ANCHOR.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. Democrats in Congress are running on empty.
I said running on empty. Hello is this mic on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
11. Fox News: "Bin Laden Already Dead"
Fox News: "Bin Laden Already Dead"

Wednesday, December 26, 2001

Usama bin Laden has died a peaceful death due to an untreated lung complication, the Pakistan Observer reported, citing a Taliban leader who allegedly attended the funeral of the Al Qaeda leader.

"The Coalition troops are engaged in a mad search operation but they would never be able to fulfill their cherished goal of getting Usama alive or dead," the source said.

Bin Laden, according to the source, was suffering from a serious lung complication and succumbed to the disease in mid-December, in the vicinity of the Tora Bora mountains. The source claimed that bin Laden was laid to rest honorably in his last abode and his grave was made as per his Wahabi belief.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,41576,00.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------

The Death of bin Ladenism
By AMIR TAHERI
Published: July 11, 2002

Osama bin Laden is dead. The news first came from sources in Afghanistan and Pakistan almost six months ago: the fugitive died in December and was buried in the mountains of southeast Afghanistan. Pakistan's president, Pervez Musharraf, echoed the information. The remnants of Osama's gang, however, have mostly stayed silent, either to keep Osama's ghost alive or because they have no means of communication.

With an ego the size of Mount Everest, Osama bin Laden would not have, could not have, remained silent for so long if he were still alive. He always liked to take credit even for things he had nothing to do with. Would he remain silent for nine months and not trumpet his own survival?

Even if he is still in the world, bin Ladenism has left for good. Mr. bin Laden was the public face of a brand of politics that committed suicide in New York and Washington on Sept. 11, 2001, killing thousands of innocent people in the process.

What were the key elements of that politics?

The first was a cynical misinterpretation of Islam that began decades ago with such anti-Western ideologues as Maulana Maudoodi of Pakistan and Sayyid Qutb of Egypt. Although Mr. Maudoodi and Mr. Qutb were not serious thinkers, they could at least offer a coherent ideology based on a narrow reading of Islamic texts. Their ideas about Western barbarism and Muslim revival, distilled down to bin Ladenism, became mere slogans designed to incite zealots to murder.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9405EFDE1230F932A25754C0A9649C8B63


Someone with an account at Michael Moore's site should post this there....

Ghost

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. "Republican leaders should pay more attention to the warnings of terrorists like Osama bin Laden...
...and spend less time "clearing brush" from old hog farms they bought so they could pretend it was a ranch during photo ops."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
15. fuck bu$h* he is irrelevant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
16. Even if you've never given those groups a dime in the past...
I would humbly suggest putting Chimpy McFuckstain in his place by doing so now.

(I happily contributed for the first time to the ACLU the day after his Daddy smeared Dukakis by calling him a "card-carrying member of the ACLU.")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alter Ego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
17. Fuck off, Dubya. Your henchmen in Congress
are responsible for the largest spending increase in history. Thank God we got most of them out in 2006 before they could do permanent damage.

And your tired, cliched insults about Democrats are getting old and stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC