Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FEDERAL WILDLIFE REPORT CENSORED

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:05 PM
Original message
FEDERAL WILDLIFE REPORT CENSORED
Censored being rather an understatement in this case. It's blacked out like top secret document during war time. This is so utterly ridiculous that a case could be made for taking the official that ordered this to oourt and making him him/her pay back the cost of the labor and material it took to to do this as a complete waste of time.

--###--

peer

or Immediate Release: June 23, 2008
Contact: Carol Goldberg (202) 265-7337

FEDERAL WILDLIFE REPORT CENSORED

Highly Redacted Inspector General Report Posted on Official Website

Washington, DC — A large portion of an Inspector General evaluation of federal wildlife programs has been blacked out prior to publication, according to Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). Even data tables have been excised from a report on Endangered Species Act implementation, with cutouts so extensive that the core section of the report is virtually unreadable.

The June 2008 “Progress Evaluation of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Endangered Species Program” by the Interior Office of Inspector General (IG) and posted on the agency website offers only a single, cryptic legal reference as the reason for the wholesale text deletions:

“Portions of this report have been redacted pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5) of the Freedom of Information Act.”

That exemption reads:

“(5) inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums or letters which would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency.”

“Well, that clears it up,” remarked PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch, who was unable to get anyone from the IG office to explain why it published a report that was bowdlerized into incomprehensibility. “How well we are protecting endangered wildlife should not be classified a state secret.”

By contrast, the same IG website displays reports on seemingly far more sensitive subjects, such as an assessment of security on the National Mall and criminal wildlife enforcement, without a single redaction.

Besides its excessive secrecy, the Bush administration has also been harshly criticized for scientific suppression and political interference in its application of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). In fact, the Interior Department has lost so many legal challenges brought by conservation groups, including PEER, that agency administrators complain the program is being run by lawsuits.

The most heavily excised portion of the IG report concerns the need for strategic planning in ESA but the report offers little substantive guidance. For example, one uncensored “Suggestion” urges –

“Convene a working group, including an individual or individuals with logic modeling expertise, to develop a high-level logic model for the ESA and a detailed one for the Endangered Species Program …”

“Perhaps this report was blacked out because it is so inane,” added Ruch, whose organization has submitted a Freedom of Information Act request for the deleted portions. “The performance of the Inspector General suggests we have the blind leading the blind over at the Interior Department.”

###












complete release including links to related sources here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tnlurker Donating Member (698 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Somebody please tell me that this is from the Onion
This must be a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC