Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fox "News": NAACP is registering prisoners to vote!!!!!111

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 04:52 PM
Original message
Fox "News": NAACP is registering prisoners to vote!!!!!111
If they are not convicted felons yet they still have voting priveleges and SOME PEOPLE ARE SAYING that the NAACP is going into the prisons to register these people!!!!!!!!!11 This story beoke this morning on Fox and "Friends". Gretchen Carlson was all over it, that Fox "broke" this story, and they are vowing to get to the bottom of it!!!!!!

And so it begins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. OMFG! VOTERS WILL VOTE1
Edited on Mon Jun-23-08 04:59 PM by sfexpat2000
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. LOL
Run for the hills!1

We're all gonna DIE!!!111
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fox has no friends.
Just the wingers who watch them spout the lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. as the carpenters sang, 'it's only just begun'
i expect it from faux...wait till the others get their marching orders
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Fox captive audience. TV in the toilet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. WTF??! How does that guy sleep in all that plastic?
Must be sweaty in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. This one is made to listen to Fox 24/7.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbc5g Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. McCain needs Fox's help bigtime...They know their GOP days are numbered
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Fired up. Ready to go! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. They are setting up a justification for the widespread disenfranchisement
of black voters

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. YEP.
that's how they'll try to steal this one. ChoicePoint makes it easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I'd bet the farm on that. BUT, their tactics have been outed
so far since 2000 & 2004, I sincerely don't believe they can manage another theft this time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. maybe in the old slave states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Maybe but we've run down how they do it.
There will be a degree of scrutiny they've never undergone before.

We know how it will come down. The real weak link is what we can do with the evidence that we can put together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Too often once we get the evidence, the crooks are sworn in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Yes. Absolutely. That will be the test. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. We would have to find a way of not having to deal with bush's DoJ.
They're only pull shit on states with Rep control. It's going to be very difficult for them to screw up Ohio now that Blackwell isn't there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. Plus there are a lot more people watching now who know what
to look for than there were in 2004, let alone, 2000. Vote suppression in swing states, in black, student, military precincts. Via caging, dropping Dem registrants off the rolls, under equipping polling places. Via machine fraud but that will be harder now because there has been a measure of attention to the machines.

That's how they'll try it. Our job is not to let it happen. We're playing chicken with our election. Hoo, boy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #32
42. I'm a Precinct Judge. I am in charge of the voting machines in my
precinct. The chain of custody is good, but still there is no voter verified paper trail. That's where the chain breaks down.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. Sure. That and when technicians are called in to fix problems
Edited on Tue Jun-24-08 03:58 PM by sfexpat2000
mid-vote.

That happened in MI the night of the Democratic primary. In 20 counties, the machines were counting "uncommitted" as "write in". Some of those machines were re-booted and who knows how many votes were lost that way. The Sec of State didn't want to even admit they did that. When I called, at first they only said they hand counted the ballots once the problem was identified. But as the rep got more relaxed, she said they "re-programmed" during the course of the night.

Some kind of record of tech interaction during the voting period needs to be part of the process. I don't know how many venues have already done that or how many really do keep track.

/oops
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. So far our machines (eSlate) have worked well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my2sense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why are they still considered a news outlet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. Oh what total crap
States decide if felons can vote or not. So many of those in prison are likely very eligible to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. Hannity will implode on screen over this and melt like Colonel Dietrich
Until your dreams come true. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
43. I'd whip out my credit card for a pay-per-view of that!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. Good for the NAACP, shame on FOX
Anyone who will be legally eligible to vote in November needs to know that they are eligible to vote and they need to get registered. It doesn't matter if they are in prison or not, if they will have the right to vote then it is great that people are informing them of that right.

For FOX news to attack the NAACP for legal voter registration effort reeks of racism, and shows that FOX wants to make sure that eligible voters are disenfranchised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
17. Isn't Rove their host?
Brazen beyond belief!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Actually, no
he's the guy up on the catwalk pulling the strings. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
18. Breaking news, future inmates are now running the wh and Faux
Nooze is running interference for them, still, to this day. UNREEL11!!1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. touche'!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
22. But surely all of them would be voting for McCain.
You know, instead of that arrogant guy from the country club making snide comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maureen1322 Donating Member (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
23. If they can legally vote, what's the problem.
Maybe I'm not considering the source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. They can't vote. In fact, even after they've served their time a lot of them are disenfranchised...
...forever. That was the basis of Florida's bogus "cleaning" of the voter records before the 2000 election -- they were cleansing the rolls of black voters, most of whom are Democrats. Most of the voters thus disenfranchised were perfectly law-abiding citizens.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maureen1322 Donating Member (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #30
36. I'm confused. Why can't they vote? They haven't been convicted yet.
Edited on Tue Jun-24-08 05:25 AM by Maureen1322
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 06:00 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. Apparently FOX is claiming that *prisoners* are being registered. Prisoners by definition are con-
Prisoners by definition are convicts, right? So, this is a lie on two counts. First that the NAACP would try registering prisoners for the vote, and second, that prisoners could vote.

What happens in many states is that once a person has been convicted of a felony they lose the right to vote permanently. This sounds terrible -- and it is. I understand the idea of disenfranchising a convicted prisoner -- they lose their civil rights while in prison. But to make that permanent? It seems contrary to the intent of the Constitution.

We all know that young black men are disproportionately likely to have been arrested and convicted of a crime. Behaviors that might be passed off as youthful indiscretions in young white men (possession of pot, a little coke, DUI, disorderly conduct, addiction), which then would cause the judge to redirect the sentence to community service, treatment centers, etc. -- if the arrestee is black, often results in a harsh prison sentence and a permanent felony record.

Under the direction of Katherine Harris (remember her?) Florida hired a right-wing outfit to clean the voter rolls before the 2000 election. Basically they "cleaned" the rolls of black Democrats. If a felon in Texas was named John A. Public and a respectable voter in Florida was named John Q. Public, voila! And they never knew it until they tried to cast their ballot.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maureen1322 Donating Member (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. Thanks for the clarification.
I have personal experience with the "Justice" system. I know for fact what being white and having a little money will do for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
25. "Some say......"
The Faux company line....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trekologer Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #25
41. Is turnabout fair play?
Some say that Neil Cavuto enjoys goats.

Some say that Sean Hannity takes it in the rear from his "mandate".

Some say that Bill O'Rielly does odd things with loofas...oh wait that one is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pushed To The Left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
26. The right wing seems to want less people to be able to vote.
They seem very consistent about this. In my opinion, once somebody pays his or her debt to society, he or she should have the right to vote. Why does voting scare the right wing so much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #26
33. Because numbers favor Democrats. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
31. In Canada the franchise to vote in a federal election was ruled to

be a fundamental right of all Canadians over
the age of 18, including prison inmates regardless
of the crime committed.

Why shouldn't criminals vote? Criminals run for
office every day. Some sit in Parliament.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
34. OMG...Abramoff ?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
35. They'll Vote With All The "Illegal Aliens"
Yep...sure sounds like the drumbeat for more disenfranchisement is on the way. The racist whisper campaign ramps up another notch as it's not just scary that some black feller is running for President, but that other blacks or minorities will dare vote for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
37. You spelled Faux wrong
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
39. If they are not convicted felons, they have the right to vote.
So why should they not vote?
Republicans run their criminals for congress-what's the difference?

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC