Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oil: Windfall profits tax. Percentage based or price cap?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 01:26 PM
Original message
Oil: Windfall profits tax. Percentage based or price cap?
Edited on Thu Jun-19-08 01:26 PM by WakingLife
I'm trying to figure out if the windfall profit tax that the press keeps referring to, from Obama, is a price cap or is percentage based. One article said that he proposed taxing anything over $80/barrel but I couldn't figure out if it was an example or a fixed cap. All the serach results are to McCain's response and not what Obama said (go figure!). For what it is worth I think a cap is a pretty bad idea. As production costs go up the price needs to be able to go up or else there is less incentive to produce the same amount. A capped profit percentage on the other hand is more helpful. It encourages oil producers to make more money by producing more not by just raising the prices and at the same time allowing the market to follow any increased production costs over time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. We need to bring back the progressive tax system
Edited on Thu Jun-19-08 01:35 PM by Warpy
Windfall profits were addressed by the progressive nature of the tax. In other words, when a company's profit showed a sudden spike due to any sort of profiteering, accidental or intended, that profit was taxed at a much higher rate than their ordinary profits were.

The same thing happened with individuals. There was a built in disincentive to the type of naked greed we've seen in top corporate management. It didn't do any good to loot one's corporation to the tunes of tens of millions of dollars a year because everything over an ordinarily princely salary was taxed at 90%.

The progressive tax system barely fell on the working class at all until inflation caused bracket creep to occur in a system based on fixed dollar amounts, something easily avoidable by tying it to the median wage.

Until and unless we return to this system of taxation, we won't be able to begin to address the truly staggering economic problems this country will be facing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah. I guess that is basically what I am saying.
If your profits are 10% of your costs right now and you try to increase them to 20% for no good reason then we're going to take most of that extra anyway so don't even try. Going on a profit percentage basis rather than a fixed dollar amount, it seems to me, would encourage more production since that is the only way to make more profit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. just take 90% of all speculation profits and put it into a national solar project..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. We need to make market speculation illegal.
Guarantee that the price of gas would drop at least $2.50 / gal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. What makes you think the recent price increases have anything to do with increased PRODUCTION costs?
IMO they are all about increased speculation and profit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Well I didn't really say that.
Surely though there can be increases in production costs now or in the future. My only point was that picking fixed caps doesn't work well with that possibility. It would need to be somehow pegged to production costs so if they did rise the market can respond. I don't have a problem with caps in the short run though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC