Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Suppose the war isn't over by 2008, what's the best response?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 06:43 AM
Original message
Poll question: Suppose the war isn't over by 2008, what's the best response?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Easy.
Lamonts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. That worked out real well the first time we tried it, didn't it?
No wait... it didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Well, the ones that wanted
a DINO got a DINO. At least the DINO was challenged and lost his party's nomination and could not run as a democrat. It signaled an end to capitulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. end to capitulation? How many times does Lieberman have to surrender to right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. Suppose?
There is no possibility of our "victory" in Iraq, and as is about to be demonstrated with the upcoming vote on more war appropriations, the one effective path to forcing our withdrawal is 'off the table' with our pathetic Democratic Party leaders. It is a simple fact: the war, that is the ongoing occupation of conquered territories in the middle east, will be in approximately the same state it is in today or worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. There is *NO DOUBT* in my mind that as of 2002, we should have...
Edited on Tue Mar-06-07 07:39 AM by Tesha
There is *NO DOUBT* in my mind that as of 2002, we should have
started replacing *EVERY* Democrat who, in their cowardice and
wish to keep their jobs, was complicit with Bush.

And after the Lamont experience, I don't give a damn if it means
leaving (alleged) Democrats behind. It couldn't have been made
more clear to us than it was in 2006 in CT that the Corporate
Wing of the Democratic Party doesn't give a damn what we think,
and they'd sooner vote for a non-Democrat Right Winger than
allow us to have any say in the political process.

So Lamont(s), if possible, but otherwise, candidates we can
believe in who actually stand for something, whether or not
they have a "D" before their names.

In *EVERY* election, unseat corporatist warmongers.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. the Democrats should have kicked Lieberman in the nuts after he lost the primary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PhilipShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. Other: The war is never going to end -- ever
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. yeah, if the uprising in Mexico gets out of hand, they'll say that's al Qaeda too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. General strike
Is all that we have left.
But it would take courage that i am not sure many have...to quint your job or be fired from it and move to a camp site on the White house lawn with the intent of staying until the police arrive with tanks and tear gas to take you out. or your demands are met (not likely as long as they know the numbers of strikers are small.)
But if the numbers were large enough to shut down Washington and the support was there it just could change things. But it would have to be very large, so large that only a huge massacre would stop it to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. it's funny that the term "general strike" isn't even in most people's vocabulary here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. I would do that, but as a bald guy, I know Bush would actually get off if he saw me out the window
"Condi! I think I see Bulldog! Bring me some Kleenex fur wipies..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. The antichrist was suppose to get 7 years of tribulation and he still
needs a couple of more months to finish his mission in order to retire in Texas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC