|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:13 PM Original message |
All that's needed for impeachment is a SIMPLE MAJORITY in the House. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
1. right, for the first step, but isn't it 67 to convict in the Senate? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:18 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. they ignore that part |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 06:19 PM Response to Reply #2 |
17. Impeachment is more important than removal at this point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BR_Parkway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 09:18 PM Response to Reply #17 |
28. Public hearings of the crimes need to happen, the rest would very quickly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aristus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:18 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. We don't need to convict him, just indict (impeach) him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elizfeelinggreat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:20 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. AMEN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gulfcoastliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:44 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. The DLCers ignore that part. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. a failed impeachment doesn't help us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:53 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Maybe one day they'll stop breaking laws then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 09:40 PM Response to Reply #12 |
31. If they expect impeachment at the drop of a hat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mudesi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:58 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. That is the most ridiculous talking point in the world |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 06:03 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. "The republicas were hurt by their failed attempt on Clinton." BULLSHIT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 07:03 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. **crickets** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 07:07 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. Check the polls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 07:14 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Check the FACTS.. there was *still* a republican majority... period.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 09:41 PM Response to Reply #15 |
32. Didn't Gore win in 2000? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 09:44 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Is, or was, he ever in the White House as President? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 09:45 AM Response to Reply #15 |
38. The repubs suffered historic losses in the House in 1998 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 01:26 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. What were the consequences of that "historic loss"? Hint: Nothing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 07:15 PM Response to Reply #7 |
24. Yes, "it acquits Bush" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aristus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 08:06 PM Response to Reply #7 |
25. The impeachment of Clinton handed the repukes the White House. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hokies4ever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 09:31 PM Response to Reply #7 |
29. "every president from here on out will be impeached" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 11:10 PM Response to Reply #7 |
34. i don't think so... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 09:34 PM Response to Reply #3 |
30. Awesome Point Aristus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. Once the trial is on in the Senate, the MSM cannot ignore it and will have to report it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crickets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 02:59 PM Response to Reply #11 |
41. That is one of the most important by-products of impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 07:28 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Exactly. BTW...Did you notice that the person I was responding to never replied? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crickets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 10:21 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Yes, I noticed :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 06:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
16. Yes, that is correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
5. should be a no-brainer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
8. I don't think so. Pelosi won't have it . n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
9. Kucinich with Wexler's help is "moving slowly" trying to "nudge Conyers and Pelosi. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
10. Yet..our Dems still Cower? There's more to this than we know.....eom. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:54 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. My guess... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 06:41 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. that's becoming more apparent every day. sooner or later someone is going to spill the beans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 07:13 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. We have to hope that eventually the "beans are spilled." I never thought Scotty would "spill beans" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
19. And that is probably the biggest reason why there will be no impeachment hearings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
26. Unfortunately it's not that simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
27. All that's needed to avoid him being acquitted of all charges is 67 Senators. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 09:34 AM Response to Reply #27 |
35. doesn't matter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
36. And dats all folks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
37. and there aren't the votes to get a simple majority in the house |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
40. I don't see why everybody is so afraid of this. So what if we lose in the Senate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 04:16 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC