Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SHELL’S REVOLVING DOOR SWINGS ARCTIC DRILLING PROGRAM

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:56 PM
Original message
SHELL’S REVOLVING DOOR SWINGS ARCTIC DRILLING PROGRAM
Boy, they want that arctic oil so bad they can taste it. Environmental disaster? Hey, you hafta take some risks to be as rich as these oil moguls are. Of course, they aren't actually taking any risks. Ain't fascistic capitalism beeyountifull?
--###--


original-peer

SHELL’S REVOLVING DOOR SWINGS U.S. ARCTIC DRILLING PROGRAM

Oil Company Grabs Top Agency Managers to Push What They Used to Regulate

Washington, DC — Since Shell Oil Company re-entered the Arctic market in 2005, it has avidly acquired the services of an array of former Bush administration officials who previously worked in the U.S. Interior Department on that agency’s efforts to open the Outer Continental Shelf to oil and gas development, according to Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER).

As a consequence, many of the federal managers who recently oversaw the Interior Arctic program have now crossed over to pursue the opportunities they helped craft in their public positions, including:

* Cam Toohey - former Special Assistant to the Interior Secretary for Alaska (the main official overseeing all Interior agencies in Alaska) became Shell’s Alaska Government and External Affairs Manager in January 2006;
* Paul Stang – former Alaska Minerals Management Service (MMS) Regional Supervisor for Leasing and Environment (who was MMS project manager for the very controversial Bristol Bay oil leases) was hired by Shell in early 2007 to work on its Arctic Ocean programs; and
* Tom Readinger – former Associate Director of the MMS Offshore Minerals Management Program (who had considerable influence over recent Beaufort and Chukchi Seas lease sale documents) is now doing contract work for Shell.

“In Alaska, the revolving door between regulator and regulated appears to be swinging at record speed,” state PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch. “Key officials who were supposed to be representing the public are suddenly turning up on the other side of the table with disturbing regularity.”

While Shell is especially aggressive in Alaska, its acquisition of Bush administration figures includes –

* Former Interior Secretary Gale Norton — Norton is now general counsel for Shell’s exploration and production business in the U.S., with focus on Shell’s shale and oil sands interests in the Rockies; and
* Elizabeth Stolpe, a former Bush environment adviser, Brian Malnak, a former Interior Department advisor who was a chief of staff for then-Senator Frank Murkowski (R-AK) when he chaired the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, and Kevin O’Donovan, a former domestic policy adviser to Vice President Cheney on climate change and energy policy.

“The Bush administration is morphing into a wholly owned subsidiary of Shell,” added Ruch. “The overall impression is that public service was not a calling but a stepping stone for oil company lobbyists.”

###










complete release including links to related sources here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't have any doubt that
the oil companies are exploiting the fact Congress can't do much of anything about higher gas prices as long as Bu$hCo is in office and Bu$hCo isn't going to try to do anything as long as their cronies profit from it. They will continue to hide behind the same old excuses they always use to justify higher and higher gas prices hoping that it will lead to more off shore drilling and opening of ANWR. For Bu$hCo and the oil companies its a win all the way around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. So, I have asked this several times here. Isn't the oil from the pipeline in Alaska sold overseas?
The lower 48 states have never benefited from that oil, have we? Or am I wrong? If that is the case, how would drilling in the ANWR relieve us from foreign oil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC