Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LOL. --178 Republicans vote *against* Mother's Day

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:00 PM
Original message
LOL. --178 Republicans vote *against* Mother's Day
VIDEO of the calling of the vote here
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/05/09/republicans-vote-ag... /

Republicans Vote Against Moms; No Word Yet on Puppies, Kittens
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/20...

On Wednesday afternoon, the House had just voted, 412 to 0, to pass H. Res. 1113, "Celebrating the role of mothers in the United States and supporting the goals and ideals of Mother's Day," when Rep. Todd Tiahrt (R-Kan.), rose in protest.

"Mr. Speaker, I move to reconsider the vote," he announced.

Rep. Kathy Castor (D-Fla.), who has two young daughters, moved to table Tiahrt's request, setting up a revote. This time, 178 Republicans cast their votes against mothers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Get thee to the Greatest Page ASAP.
Oh, my Lord, this mom is laughing so hard I've got to leave for a moment--excuse me...

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. wtf?
are they THAT paranoid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leftist Agitator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fucking idiots.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. 178 Reptilian douche bags,
voting against celebrating Mothers, UNBELIEVABLE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Whoops -- I guess they went and looked up the history of Mother's Day...
From Wikipedia:

The United States celebrates Mother's Day on the second Sunday in May. In the United States, Mother's Day was loosely inspired by the British day and was imported by social activist Julia Ward Howe after the American Civil War. However, it was intended as a call to unite women against war. In 1870, she wrote the Mother's Day Proclamation as a call for peace and disarmament. Howe failed in her attempt to get formal recognition of a Mother's Day for Peace. Her idea was influenced by Ann Jarvis, a young Appalachian homemaker who, starting in 1858, had attempted to improve sanitation through what she called Mothers' Work Days. She organized women throughout the Civil War to work for better sanitary conditions for both sides, and in 1868 she began work to reconcile Union and Confederate neighbors.


It will be interesting to see if there is any coverage about where Mother's Day came from in conjunction with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizfeelinggreat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
28. That's right !!
I should have read the whole thread more carefully before I posted below!

I'm sure they did know what it was all about but didn't dare admit they wanted to avoid endorsing a holiday that was meant to "unite women against war". LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
32. Now do you see why I call them Motherfuckers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadmessengers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. There has to be more to it than this.
There has to be - there's just no other rational explanation for this? Was there some crazy amendment in there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. That's what I want to know.
This seems like half the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dnbmathguy Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. It was a procedural tactic to try and slow things down
Still, who thought it would be a good idea to vote against Mother's Day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maui9002 Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
38. Milbank's article in Washington Post has explanation
In addition to be a procedural tactic, Milbank explains what GOP is doing to stop votes on mortgage crisis relief (like holding "revotes" on Mothers Day, which may really backfire for GOP), that GOP is complaining that Democrats aren't including them in legislative process (sound familiar, Mr. Boehner? Payback's a bitch, isn't it?), and that Boehner thinks election of Democrat in Republican district in Louisiana is a "wakeup" call for Republicans (he's just now waking up to the notion that the country is dissatisfied with Republicans?????) It's an interesting read (although you may need to go to WaPo website to find; link above doesn't seem to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLib at work Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. I truly believe that there is some sort of contagious insanity among the Repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dnbmathguy Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. How can anyone be that stupid?
"They were for Mother's Day, before they were against it." That needs to be repeated non-stop from now until the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. Coming up next: Repukes come out against apple pie
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. Like in Feb 1995 when they (and some Dems) VOTED DOWN THE 4TH AMENDMENT?
February 7, 1995 - House Republicans Vote Down Fourth Amendment

Republicans Vote Down the 4th Amendment (sort of)

It's amazing what you find on the 'net. I had a brainlock while doing my last post on McClellan leaving his job and had to look up the 4th ammendment to make sure I had the right one when I stumbled across this web page on the personal site of Michael DuVernois, an assistant professor at the University of Minnesota. Here's what the page says:
February 7, 1995 - House Republicans Vote Down Fourth Amendment

During the debate today over the House Republicans' bill about the Exclusionary Rule, the House Black Caucus introduced an amendment to the bill that the Republicans promptly voted down. The amendment turned out to be the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, verbatim. The House Republicans were "chagrined." The vote was 303-121, meaning that a number of Democrats joined the Republicans.


http://thepetecom.blogspot.com/2006/04/republicans-vote-down-4th-amendment.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Then there was the time some people in Maine took a petition to a shopping mall
and tried to get people to sign it.

Few people would. They got called communists, and worse.

The petition consisted of the Bill of Rights, verbatim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
33. "a number of Democrats joined the Republicans."
Which is yet another reason why the nation is in the sorry shape it's in....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. Procedural delay was the motive.
Edited on Fri May-09-08 01:26 PM by silverweb
From the article:

Republicans, unhappy with the Democratic majority, have been using such procedural tactics as this all week to bring the House to a standstill, but the assault on mothers may have gone too far.

<snip>

Whatever happens in Mississippi, Boehner has enough trouble to preoccupy him here in Washington, where House Democrats have been passing their agenda with little thought for Republican preferences. "The majority has taken, once again, their go-it-alone policy," Boehner lamented yesterday. "It's time for Democrats and Republicans to work together."

To induce this working together, Boehner decided to stop the House from working at all. As House Democrats tried to pass legislation to ease the mortgage crisis on Wednesday, Republicans served up hours of procedural delays, demanding a score of roll call votes: 10 motions to adjourn, half a dozen motions to reconsider, various and sundry amendments, a motion to approve the daily journal, a motion to instruct and a "motion to rise."


Typical reTHUG tactics. If they can't get their way all the time, no one's going to get anything done at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. If I remember correctly
this is the same type of tactic they used in the mid-'90s and guaranteed Bill Clinton's re-election.

Bring 'em on!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Speaking of the 90's
see post #19
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Your sig line--OMG, I love it!
I'm really partial to mine, but I've suffered with that dimwit as my Senator since even before I had a choice in the matter--could I copy it, maybe?


Regardless, kudos to you or to whomever came up with it--that's perfect!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. So is Boh-ner going to cry about having to celebrate Mother's Day??
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
35. Sheesh. Now that's chutzpah!
Am I the only one who recalls how Dennis Hastert vowed in December of 2004 to ignore all legislation that did not have majority Republican support? Or how Democratic Members of Congress were literally locked out of appropriations committee deliberations in 2005? Or how Sen. Lott happily trotted out the so-called nuclear option as a means of killing the same procedural games Boehner is now playing? Or how Ted Stevens threatened to resign if the victims of Hurricane Katrina were given the funds slated for the bridge to nowhere?

So when boner whines about the "go it alone policy" of the Democrats in Congress, let us all recall that whenever we want to, we can send every last damned Republican up Connecticut Avenue to their prostitutes' love nests while the grown-ups sort out the mess they've made. They showed us how to do it.

The Democratic Party chooses not to do such a thing because it is disrespectful of parliamentary rule and the minority voice in Congress. That these troglodytes happily participated in trashing that tradition should be item number one in any discussion of the issue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. Here is the text of the bill...
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=hr110-1113&tab=summary
The following summary is provided by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan government entity that serves Congress and is run by the Library of Congress. The summary is taken from the official website THOMAS.
4/16/2008--Introduced.
Celebrates the role of mothers in the United States and supports the goals and ideals of Mother's Day.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=hr110-1113
Text of Legislation

HRES 1113 EH

H. Res. 1113

(this part should be crossed out but I can't figure out how to do that) InH. RES. 1113Celebrating the role of mothers in the United States and supporting the goals and ideals of Mother's Day.IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESApril 16, 2008Mr. FORTENBERRY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government ReformRESOLUTIONCelebrating the role of mothers in the United States and supporting the House of Representatives, U. S.,

May 7, 2008.

Whereas Mother's Day is celebrated on the second Sunday of each May;

Whereas the first official Mother's Day was observed on May 10, 1908, in Grafton, West Virginia, and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania;

Whereas 2008 is the 100th anniversary of the first official Mother's Day observation;

Whereas in 1908, Elmer Burkett, a U.S. senator from Nebraska, proposed making Mother's Day a national holiday;

Whereas in 1914, Congress passed a resolution designating the second Sunday of May as Mother's Day;

Whereas it is estimated that there are more than 82,000,000 mothers in the United States;

Whereas mothers have made immeasurable contributions toward building strong families, thriving communities, and ultimately a strong Nation;

Whereas the services rendered to the children of the United States by their mothers have strengthened and inspired the Nation throughout its history;

Whereas we honor ourselves and mothers in the United States when we revere and emphasize the importance of the role of the home and family as the true foundation of the Nation;

Whereas mothers continue to rise to the challenge of raising their families with love, understanding, and compassion, while overcoming the challenges of modern society; and

Whereas May 11, 2008 is recognized as Mother's Day: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives celebrates the role of mothers in the United States and supports the goals and ideals of Mother's Day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
15. WHY DO THEY HATE AMERICA. I HAVE NEVER SEEN SOMETHING SO ANTI AMERICAN
I bet most were even wearing flag pins made in China.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. Great article outlining the failures of the Congressional Republicans.
I recommend reading the whole thing--and the photo is priceless... :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
18. They must reproduce asexually then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Nah--snowflake babies. "Mom" is no more than a vessel, as in the FlighMom Mark IV,
Edited on Fri May-09-08 01:44 PM by blondeatlast
pictured here:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. They are adherents of "Quiverful" Evangelism...
...which states sex is bad, but Christian children is good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
24. Tiahrt is a lying DOUCHEBAG..
here is a screen capture of the official press release on Tiahrt's congressional website.


here's a link to Tiahrt's website: http://tiahrt.house.gov/

Here's Tiahrt's phone number (be sure to let him know how you feel about his hatred of mothers): 202.225.6216
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
25. Those dirty muthers!
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizfeelinggreat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
26. Mother's Day = PEACE
Isn't that right or do I have the wrong day?

Didn't the woman who started or inspired Mother's Day movement write a poem about ending war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizfeelinggreat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Here it is:
The United States celebrates Mother's Day on the second Sunday in May. In the United States, Mother's Day was loosely inspired by the British day and was imported by social activist Julia Ward Howe after the American Civil War. However, it was intended as a call to unite women against war. In 1870, she wrote the Mother's Day Proclamation as a call for peace and disarmament. Howe failed in her attempt to get formal recognition of a Mother's Day for Peace. Her idea was influenced by Ann Jarvis, a young Appalachian homemaker who, starting in 1858, had attempted to improve sanitation through what she called Mothers' Work Days. She organized women throughout the Civil War to work for better sanitary conditions for both sides, and in 1868 she began work to reconcile Union and Confederate neighbors.

When Jarvis died in 1907, her daughter, named Anna Jarvis, started the crusade to found a memorial day for women. The first such Mother's Day was celebrated in Grafton, West Virginia, on 10 May 1908, in the church where the elder Ann Jarvis had taught Sunday School. Originally the Andrews Methodist Episcopal Church, this building is now the International Mother's Day Shrine (a National Historic Landmark). From there, the custom caught on — spreading eventually to 45 states. The holiday was declared officially by some states beginning in 1912. In 1914 President Woodrow Wilson declared the first national Mother's Day, as a day for American citizens to show the flag in honor of those mothers whose sons had died in war.


from Wikipedia

Those republicans don't need no stinking peace!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
29. Congress finds itself voting against Mom (Another link to the WaPo article:)
... For the record, Fossella did not participate in the Mother's Day vote.

Neither is Boehner likely to be helped by a Senate Ethics Committee decision Thursday exonerating Sen. David Vitter, R-La., over his use of the "D.C. Madam's" call girls. The Senate cleared him because the prostitution occurred when he was in the House - and the House can't punish him because he left for the Senate. The madam, meanwhile, killed herself by hanging last week.

Then Boehner must grapple with the problematic case of Don Cazayoux. The Democrat last week won a House seat in Louisiana vacated by Republican Richard Baker. The seat hadn't been held by a Democrat since 1974, and President Bush won 59 percent of the vote in the district in 2004. "The loss in Louisiana is a wake-up call," Boehner admitted Thursday ...

Boehner decided to stop the House from working at all. As House Democrats tried to pass legislation to ease the mortgage crisis on Wednesday, Republicans served up hours of procedural delays, demanding a score of roll call votes: 10 motions to adjourn, half a dozen motions to reconsider, various and sundry amendments, a motion to approve the daily journal, a motion to instruct and a "motion to rise." ...

http://www.azcentral.com/offbeat/articles/2008/05/08/20080508motherhood-vote0508-ON.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. why those motherless . . . .
(best comment on the log lol)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
31. This Nay vote on Mother's Day could
come in very handy for the Dem opponent running against the Mother-Hater!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
36. What good is a cheap tin flag on one's lapel
. . . if one doesn't honor motherhood?

These guys probably hate apple pie, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
37. Wrote my ltte about our idiot rep.
Walberg is such a schmuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
klook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
39. Against Mother's Day, against all helpful economic and health initiatives...
Are we seeing a pattern here? Are Republicans anti-Life?

Well, at least they're for guns and the Unborn, and agin' gay marriage!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC