Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hey, I just saw a TV ad for the new Honda fuel cell car!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
pepperbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:55 PM
Original message
Hey, I just saw a TV ad for the new Honda fuel cell car!
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 06:56 PM by pepperbear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R 270 mile between refueling. Wow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orangerevolution Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Is that all, 270 miles?
I get over 320 on a full tank of gas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I think you're missing the point here - or are you being funny? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orangerevolution Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. If I needed to travel over 300 miles but
only could make it to mile 270, then I would say yes, I missed the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. It doesn't use gasoline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. 270 miles on a tank of gas is average
I can get more than 300 easy highway driving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Too bad we'll have to burn coal to use it!
But yeah it's purty :P

They need to just go all freakin electric already. Googleise the Tesla car my friend. Now that's a sexy ride.

I know you still have to get the electricity to use it but then we don't have to worry about shipping hydrogen all over the place and guess what? We don't have to have Shell supply our hyrdogen. that's why they keep looking for these crappy liquid fuels. Just use some lithium ions already and drop the liquid dammit!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Check out this all-electric (or hybrid option)
http://www.aptera.com/

I've been following Tesla for quite awhile. Since there was a shake up at the top, they seem a little less directed, or focused, to me. At least I'm not getting the number of update e-mails from them that I used to. :shrug:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Using batteries..
to fuel automobiles creates a whole host of issues. Waste is a big one, as are initial costs and maintenance costs.

My next car will be a diesel and I'm banking on bio-diesel from algae, switch grass and other sources as a better long term solution to our energy problems. It won't require major investments in infrastructure or mass-production facilities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Tesla is sexy but it is using the same batteries as your lap top computer.
I agree electric is the only way to go. There are serious issues about where you get the Hydrogen for fuel cells.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. One idea I have seen for hydrogen for the fuel cells is this
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 07:14 PM by Jacobin
clusters of windmills in the midwest connected to small electrolysis mechanisms that break water down into hydrogen and oxygen. The hydrogen is then gathered through gathering lines much like natural gas gathering lines in natural gas fields to main pipelines which then lead to populated areas where the hydrogen is stored for service stations.

Sometimes these changes seem overwhelming, but I consider what people did in 1910 when vehicles were first coming out. Everyone said it was ridiculous, that you would have to have gasoline filling stations all over the country and paved roads and that it was just too expensive and impractical and that it would never work.

It seems to me that hydrogen production from windmills could be a piece of the solution, although by no means the entirety of the solution.

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. This is a highly advanced battery system
Yes, using the same 18650 cells (over 6800 of them) found in many laptops, but with a wealth of mechanical and electronic monitoring and safety additions.

http://www.teslamotors.com/display_data/TeslaRoadsterBatterySystem.pdf

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. What about the Gallium and Aluminum alloy that breaks down water
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaptBunnyPants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. It better be sexy for $100000+
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FedoraLV Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. That's OK, it's a start!
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 07:14 PM by FedoraLV
:loveya:

-FedoraLV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think enclosed motorcycles are another option
They offer a bit more protection and they get amazing gas mileage (having an aerodynamic fairing around the motorcycle supposedly increases fuel efficiency up to 35%). They still burn fossil fuels, but I think single passenger vehicles should be promoted, since I see so many people alone in their car driving to work and using enormous amounts of gas in their land yachts.

The Italian-made Adiva (90 miles per gallon of gas):





The German-made BMW C1:



This single seat TECA:



or the Peraves MonoTracer, a two-seat enclosed motorcycle built around a BMW:



or the Ecomobile:



or the Acabion (350 mph top speed - 0 to 300mph in 30 seconds):



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. These things look like a lot of fun, too -->
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMightyFavog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Saw quite a few of the C1s when I was in London last summer.
Interesting machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. FYI, Honda is planning on mass producing these by 2018. You'll be waiting a while.
The Clarity will be available in a limited run only, for lease only, in Southern California only. A small number of them will be available in a closed-end 36 month lease with no buyout provision for $600 a month, and last I heard there were already waiting lists forming. This is simply a test release to see how fuel cell vehicles work in the real world.

The FCX isn't a production car, it's a test platform for the technology. They don't have anything anywhere near production, and there are technical problems that are preventing it from going into mass production right now (primarily that the primary material used in the fuel cell is so expensive that these cars would cost about $100,000 each to buy outright...these lease cars are costing them almost a million each to build).

If you live in Southern California and can afford it, it might be worthwhile to call your local Honda dealership just to see if you can get in on the program. If nothing else, it will be a cool car to drive for a few years.

If you live anywhere else, you get to join me and drool in envy.

By the way, the hydrogen for this car is obtained by hooking it up to the natural gas lines in your home. You'll be shelling out several grand for a Honda Home Energy Station, which will convert the natural gas into pure hydrogen. That part can't be leased.

The short-run Clarity also doesn't look quite as cool as the prototype in your pic above. They made it more "normal" when they decided to actually lease them.



Efficiency wise, it still requires natural gas, and Honda says that its environmental impact is about the same as a car that gets 68MPG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Are these proton-exchange membrane fuel cells?
The membrane in those cells is made from DuPont Nafion. (Please note that every purchase of an item with a PEM fuel cell in it helps my local economy--Nafion is made in exactly one place on Earth: Fayetteville, NC.) Nafion costs over $1100 per square meter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Yes, but it's the platinum that drives the cost way up.
The catalyst in these is made of platinum nanoparticles. Platinum, of course, costs over $2000 an ounce. That's always made FC units cost-inefficient. Even worse, the platinum degrades and has to be replaced, which makes fuel cells an expensive nightmare over the longer term.

Toyota announced that they'd developed a platinum free fuel cell design last year that used alkali anion exchange membranes, but it required hydrazine instead of normal hydrogen to work. Hydrazine, of course, is both incredibly toxic AND unstable (read:explosive). No government will ever permit a hydrazine powered car on the road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC