Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Drop In Seal Hunters Is Significant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 05:40 AM
Original message
Drop In Seal Hunters Is Significant

http://www.vocm.com/news-info.asp?id=28009

April 14, 2008

The number of sealing vessels participating in the hunt is down significantly this year. DFO spokesperson Larry Yetman says there are between 60 and 70 longliners on the Front, compared to some 245 last year. Approximately 45-55 smaller vessels are on the water compared to well over 4 hundred in 2007. Yetman says last year longliners in the Front got their quota in 17 hours, but it will take longer this year. He says about 38-39 per cent of the quota has been taken and they expect the hunt to continue for a couple more days. The Superintendent of Ice Operations with the Coast Guard, Denise Veber, says ice conditions are favourable so far on the Front. Brian Stone with Search and Rescue says their operations are busy, but not overwhelming. There have been 11 calls for assistance since Friday.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SteinbachMB Donating Member (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's because
...pelt prices were sharply down this year to around $31/pelt from around $100/pelt. I think break even is $70.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I hope they stay low.
Nobody wants to wear the skin of deal baby seals? People finally getting a conscience?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteinbachMB Donating Member (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. It's no skin off my chin
...but I, as a good Canadian, support the hunt. It provides good jobs in an area where there aren't many, and is also a traditional and spiritual way of life to the Inuit peoples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. It is not the Inuits most of us have trouble with, their numbers are small

It is the non-inuits I have trouble with. It is done in the off fishing season and only provides about 3% of their annual income.
If they practiced a stunned-killed-then skinned routine, there wouldn't be any gripes from most of the objectors. But they will club a seal just enough to down them. Then they look for the next seal figuring they will collect and skin later in the day. This Leads to many agonizing hours of pain. One figure quotes a full third are skinned alive while they can still feel it.

The last figure from Canada I heard was about 75% are against the kill, subsidized or not.

The only reason the hunters and coast guard don't want protesters, is documenting on video the rules that are broken. The slashed flipper law is new this year I believe, and numerous violations of it have already been caught on video.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteinbachMB Donating Member (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Only 5% are killed with the hakapik
The other 95% are killed with a high-powered rifle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'd like to think this is progress.
I hope (and not just a reaction to the weather conditions).

Peace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. I think this whole topic is complicated....
more complicated than slogans. Ecosystems are complicated and species abundance is interconnected with other species.

We've depleted the fish stocks, and whenever the fish stocks start to come back, the seal numbers boom. Oh... it's humans' fault the fish crashed, but it's a tough question when it comes down to humans eating fish or seals eating fish.

Similar situation with deer in the suburban areas of the US. The deer numbers skyrocket when there's no hunting, and cars are the biggest predator. At what point do we start hunting deer in the cul-de-sacs?

Without mountain lions, coyote numbers shoot upward. The lions are needed to kill the coyotes, but are we ready to lose a toddler or two once in a while to the lions? Do we hunt the coyotes in the suburbs... hell, in the cities... where they live?

The idea of killing baby seals is disgusting, but what DO we do with a situation of just too many animals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC