Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Apparently all our tax dollars are going to iPods and expensive suits for bureaucrats and wonks.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 05:29 AM
Original message
Apparently all our tax dollars are going to iPods and expensive suits for bureaucrats and wonks.
And here I thought it was going to private corporations to build toll roads that double charge us, to private corporations and universities for bomb development, to private corporations for reconstruction after the bombs are dropped, and to bail out corporations. Am I supposed to get upset because bureaucrats are writing off iPods? Are they kidding?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080408/ap_on_go_ot/government_credit_cards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Bleeding the Beast" - republicon homelander fundamentalist strategy to destroy America
Edited on Wed Apr-09-08 05:41 AM by SpiralHawk
"Neoconservative Republicans essentially do not care how poorly the institutions of government work because their ultimate goal is to decimate those institutions. Whether it is mining regulations, banking, securities, health care, social security, environmental protection, education, communications, immigration, port security or emergency management, the goal is the same: Privatize basic functions and reduce government oversight responsibility to a rubber stamp.

(also illegally squander tax money on private republicon kinks & republicon material indulgences).

"In neoconservative parlance, it is called “Starving the beast.” (or Bleeding the Beast)

"The beast is the government, itself, and while our elected officials are not so bold as to deliver a killing thrust, they can bleed the beast with a thousand razor-like cuts and deny essential funding required to maintain its functions.

"From the perspective of society’s well-being, the failures of the Starve the Beast policy have been nothing short of spectacular yet few analysts or pundits have bothered to connect the dots between the policy and its outcomes.

http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Feb06/Random21.htm

I guess this would include George AWOL Bush and his apparent use of Jeff Gannon. Your tax dollars at "work."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Don't want no stinkin republion homelanders bleeding, dishonoring my government
Edited on Wed Apr-09-08 08:15 AM by SpiralHawk
Give us back our money.

Give us back our Constitution.

Give us back our democracy.

Give us back our honor.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. Are we supposed to be outraged that the money wasn't spent on a couple more bombs?
:shrugs:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Nope. Outraged that the $ not spent for our citizens along the Gulf Coast
Edited on Wed Apr-09-08 08:19 AM by SpiralHawk
or our children in schools.

or to develop alternative energy.

or to repair our crumbling infrastructure.

or, or, or....the 1,0001 honest things that need to be done in the USA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. It was NEVER going to be spent for that...
We live in a deregulated, laissez faire economy. Any additional money in the economy is seized as "profits", primarily for the benefit of multinational corporations.

It reminds me of the "war clock" that was suppose to count up all of the things "we could afford" if not for the Iraq war: universal healthcare, universal secondary education, universal childcare, etc.

Most people, seeing this list, quite rightly said, "We didn't have any of that stuff, before the war, and there is no reason to believe that we would have any of that without the war..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Well, it sure as hell ought not to be spent for iPods and sex calls for republicon hypocrites
So I feel entirely justified in advocating that our tax money be spent on things that the people of the USA actually need, rather than the trinkets and kinky jollies -- and war machines -- the republicon homelanders are wasting it on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 04:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'm sure there are plenty of Democrats buying iPods with our tax dollars.
Let's not be unrealistic. We're in a good old fashioned kleptocracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 04:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. Keith Olbermann mentioned this last night
I want the government to seize the money from the Feds who bought ALL this stuff with their credit cards.

They KNOW who the abusers are, so, it would seem to me that it should be relative easy to reimburse the taxpayers.



An Agriculture Department employee fraudulently wrote 180 convenience checks for more than $642,000 to a live-in boyfriend over a six-year period. The money was used for gambling, car and mortgage payments, dinners and retail purchases that went unnoticed until USDA's inspector general received a tip from a whistle-blower. The employee, who pleaded guilty to embezzlement and tax fraud charges, was sentenced last year to 21 months in prison and ordered to repay the money.

_U.S. Postal Service workers separately billed more than $14,000 to government credit cards for Internet dating services and a dinner at a Ruth's Chris Steakhouse in Orlando, Fla., for 81 people at a cost of $160 each for steaks and crab. The dinner bill also included more than 200 appetizers and more than $3,000 worth of wine and brand-name liquor such as Courvoisier, Belvedere and Johnny Walker Gold.

In the Internet dating case, a postmaster charged $1,100 over 15 months for two online services, including the Ashley Madison Agency. The expenses went unnoticed for more than a year even though he was under internal investigation for viewing pornography on a government computer. The postmaster was eventually told to repay the Internet charges but faced no disciplinary action.

_At the Pentagon, four employees purchased $77,700 in clothing and accessories at high-end clothing and sporting goods stores. The spending included more than $45,000 at Brooks Brothers and similar stores for tailor-made suits — $7,000 of which were purchased a week before Christmas. The credit-card holders said the items were for service members working at U.S. embassies with civilian attire. Pentagon rules allow purchases of civilian clothing when performing official duty, but generally only up to $860 per person.

_Justice Department and FBI employees charged $11,000 at a Ritz Carlton hotel for coffee and "light" refreshments for 50 to 70 attendees for four days, averaging about $50 per person. Seventy percent of the total conference cost of $15,000 was for the food and beverages, while audiovisual and other support services totaled only about $4,000, or 30 percent of the charges. It was not clear what action, if any, that Justice took in light of the conference expenses, which GAO deemed excessive.

_At the State Department, one credit-card holder bought $360 worth of women's lingerie at Seduccion Boutique for use during jungle training by trainees of a drug enforcement program in Ecuador. One State Department official later agreed that the charge was questionable and stated that he would not have approved the purchase had he known about it.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thank you
to Kieth, and MuffMag
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. "...sentenced last year to 21 months in prison and ordered to repay the money." ($642,000)
how in the world is a former ag dept. employee going to come up with $642,000? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC