Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pentagon: Colleges must hand over names

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 10:26 AM
Original message
Pentagon: Colleges must hand over names

By Rick Maze
armytimes.com
Staff writer
Wednesday Apr 2, 2008

The Defense Department has announced a new get-tough policy with colleges and universities that interfere with the work of military recruiters and Reserve Officer Training Corps programs.

Under rules that will take effect April 28, defense officials said they want the exact same access to student directories that is provided to all other prospective employers.

Students can opt out of having their information turned over to the military only if they opt out of having their information provided to all other recruiters, but schools cannot have policies that exclude only the military, defense officials said in a March 28 notice of the new policy in the Federal Register.

…continued

http://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2008/04/05/pentagon-colleges-must-hand-over-names/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Jeebus. Is it fascism yet? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. "Yet?" Where the bloody hell have you been?
It's been fascism for quite some time (thanks to the collusion of the Democrats in Congress.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. 'Special" Exceptions: Bush & Cheney family memers
Republicon chickenhawks will be spared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. getting desparate for cannon fodder it sounds like....
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. "they want the exact same access...that is provided to all other prospective employers"
I've got no problems with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. You wouldn't.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. How many other prospective employers require killing, and don't allow their employees to quit? (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Agreed, they aren't exactly an "employer"
Or are distinguishable from normal employers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. What they are conveniently leaving out
is that under current policy, the military has MORE access than other prospective employers. The military is given names of "prospective employees" when they are 12 years old. This handover of names is mandated under No Child Left Behind. Now how many other employers are allowed to recruit 6th graders?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. i hear they are relentless and call you at home..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I believe they are already getting info from colleges, even in visiting them with the possibility of
applying.

I have two sons, 17 and 21 and we receive lots of calls here, even though I requested that their high school didn't give the Feds the information. That's why I suspect that their names were released from colleges.

The last call we received was from the Marines for my youngest, and my older son answered the phone. He told them that his brother was very politically active and they wouldn't want him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Heh! Wouldn't WANT him! LOL
:rofl: GOOD! :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. remember the HS kid that told them he was strung out on Weed/crank.. they took him to a head shop an
got him the stuff to drink to pass their drug test.. and he video taped them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. There is this from my local ABC news in NY! Questionable military drug testing uncovered

http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=investigators&id=4725999

Friday, November 03, 2006 | 11:25 PM
Eyewitness News Investigators Exclusive
By Jim Hoffer

(New York- WABC, November 3, 2006) (WABC) -- Just how easy is it to pass a drug test to join the military? The Eyewitness News Investigators went undercover and discovered if your test comes back positive for drugs, it's not necessarily a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. lol! I raised 'em right!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. You have to notify the school every year and fill out a special form
to keep the recruiters from getting your kids' names.

When my kid was in high school, the recruiters came to his school one day and he called them on a lie they were telling the kids. So he got in trouble and was sent to the VP's office for being rude to the recruiter. The VP threatened to call me. My kid said "You must not know my mom very well. She will probably be proud of me for what I said." LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Big pat on the back here for your kid! I did notify the school in writing every year.
My youngest didn't start getting calls until he visited a small college in PA. My older one, once he enrolled in college, which is part of my state's university system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. I had to call the recruiter's boss
This guy was an ass. He called when he knew we (the parents) weren't home. He came by our house when he knew we weren't home. I told him several times to stop calling and finally I called his boss. That was a fun conversation - NOT.

About 3 or 4 years later, my son started dating a nice girl and her parents had a birthday party for her and invited us. So we got there and introduced ourselves and the girl's father said "Oh you might not remember me but we have talked on the phone several times."

IT WAS THE RECRUITER!! And yes, he was still an ass. No, I wasn't sorry when that relationship broke up. I lived in fear of my kid getting more and more serious with that girl. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. We get calls from different recruiters (and from my conversations with them, not local),
and they don't seem to be as persistent as to what you're describing.

You have no idea how happy I am that my oldest son has a long time girlfriend who is very politically awake. It makes life around here so much easier. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. There is a guy who is a regular at Camp Casey who was a recruiter for years
He has told some horrible stories. He says it was just like any other sales job, only he was selling death. Needless to say, he is a very outspoken peace activist now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. I am so happy that he found his soul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. They started calling my kids when they were 14 years old
And now they start contacting kids at age 12.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Unfrigging believable. I wonder if Romney's strapping sons still get calls?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Of course not; they have already signed up!
Now that Dad's campaign is over, they have surely done the right thing!! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. ....
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
37. oh yes....many, many times...
Edited on Sun Apr-06-08 02:27 PM by windbreeze
And telling them the kids weren't interested, didn't interest them..(ok, I'll fess up, thousands of times may have been over the top)but....I had 3 teen agers at the same time...you have no clue, how many times we were called at home, and they called for the girl, every bit as much as they did the 2 boys...wb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Firespirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. Turn over the College Republicans' membership lists to them
I'd be fine with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
searchingforlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. This looks like the perfect business opportunity for someone.
Start a Head Hunter group that just brokers jobs between industry and universities. The business sector gets more pre-screened applicants, graduates get more access and the US military is circumvented AND SOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
16. Why would this be controversial?
Either you provide information to all recruiters or you don't. College students aren't kids, they're adults and are able to make informed decisions. It's easy enough to get information on any prospective employer, including the military, simply by using the internets. They're old enough to vote, drive, enter a legally binding contract, and buy alcohol but they're too fragile and naive to be exposed to a military recruiter? I don't buy it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. As soon as all the other jobs carry the same risk of injury and DEATH,
then I support equal access. And as soon as 100% of the military recruiters tell the truth, I support equal access.

Until then, I will speak out LOUDLY about my tax dollars being used to support lying to college kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Um, other jobs DO carry the risk of injury and death
Granted, most office jobs don't, but do they allow police and fire departments to recruit? FBI? US Marshals? Construction Project Manager-type jobs? I'm pretty sure that anyone who talks to a military recruiter is aware of what type of work the military does.

Do you think military recruiters are the only recruiters who lie to college ADULTS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. They are the only recruiters who have access to the kids when they are 12 years oid
So their outrage is bullshit.

I would also argue that anyone they talk to knows what kind of work they will do in the military. I know too many stories of recruiters lying to kids. My friend's son was told he would do data entry at a military base close to his home (he had a computer science degree). He was sent to Iraq straight out of boot camp and put into combat the day he got there. Another kid I know was told he would be a mechanic, also stateside. He went to Iraq straight out of boot camp, also in combat.

Sure most employment recruiters are not honest but military recruiters send our kids to jobs that KILL THEM. Big difference from a sales job. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. Good thing for Congress to pass a law about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
18. Gee how many of those other employers are recruiting the students to come and DIE
Edited on Sun Apr-06-08 12:43 PM by proud2Blib
What a crock of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
27. Colleges shouldn't be handing out any info unless the student opts IN. (NT)
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
28. I don't see a problem with this
By the time people graduate from College and need work they should be able to make an informed decision about who to work for. :shrug:

Now the highschool recruiting and whatnot is not ok imo.

But guys if we don't let them recruit they're going to "get" their soldiers. Would you rather they recruit or draft? A lot of countries draft every single citizen that can wiggle all their digits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. I support a draft with an option for community service
Let them join the military OR work in an outreach capacity in a high poverty area OR work in an urban school OR at a food bank OR any other job serving their community or their country. Make it mandatory for every kid at age 18 or when they graduate from college.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
38. Ah, yet another reason to vote for "the Democratic nominee" in November
Federal funding can be cut off if colleges and universities do not give recruiters and ROTC programs campus access. While student financial assistance is not at risk, other federal aid, especially research funding, can disappear if a school does not cooperate.

The Pentagon can declare colleges or universities anti-ROTC if they prohibit or prevent a Senior ROTC program from being established, maintained or efficiently operated.

The new policy is, in part, the result of a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the federal government’s ability to use funding as a means of forcing equal access for military recruiters and ROTC units on campuses.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
39. Get the military OUT of our schools and universities
If they want to set up their recruiting stations inside shopping centers, malls, etc - let them. I'd even be willing to allow them to participate in high school and college "career days" or job fairs. But why in the hell should we be allowing the military to have FULL TIME STATUS at our educational institutions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC