Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

11-Year-Old Girl Dies When Parents Choose Prayer Instead of Medical Care

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:25 PM
Original message
11-Year-Old Girl Dies When Parents Choose Prayer Instead of Medical Care
from AlterNet's PEEK:



11-Year-Old Girl Dies When Parents Choose Prayer Instead of Medical Care

Posted by Richard Blair, The All Spin Zone at 1:37 PM on March 28, 2008.

Should the parents be charged with, at a minimum, child abuse?




It's not a long trip down the road to drive me absolutely insane, but these kind of reports are simply too prevalent in 21st century America:

The mother of an 11-year-old rural Weston girl who died of untreated diabetes says she didn't know her daughter was terminally ill as she prayed for her to get better instead of taking her to the doctor.

Madeline Neumann died Sunday from an undiagnosed and treatable form of diabetes.

Her mother, Leilani Neumann, tells The Associated Press her daughter's condition worsened suddenly, and the parents stayed in prayer, believing she would recover...


I have no problem with the parents of this young lady being religious, or even bringing up their child as such. That's a personal decision that people make when they're raising their kids. In fact, it's quite possible that Madeline was cognizant of her own illness, and due to her faith, thought that her parents were doing the right thing.

However, when a child's medical condition worsens, it is incumbent on the parents to seek appropriate care for the child. Failure to do so is nothing short of child abuse, and in this particular case, the authorities should be investigating such an angle.

A simple trip to a doctor, and a prescription for insulin, would have saved the girl's life. We are not living in an era of witch doctors and the letting of blood to drain evil spirits.

Here's a link to another report that provides even more disturbing details. Should the parents be charged?


http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/80641/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. In their defense, they didn't choose prayer OVER medical attention.
They seriously thought she was going to be okay.

These aren't Christian Scientists or other whacko Christian zealots who refused medical care for their daughter. She had been taken the doctors before for other conditions.

This was a simple (though tragic) lack of judgment in this particular instance that they truly didn't think she had anything life-threatening.

It's easy to blow this up into Jesus Crispy nutjobs watched their kid die because they were sure Gawd Almighty was agonna save her.

That wasn't the reality in this case.

Were they stupid? Yeah, I think they were - they should have had her to a hospital earlier. Were they religiously inept or whack-job insane about it? No, I don't think so. I don't they're criminally negligent, either. This is the kind of wrong, but easily made, decision that parents sometimes make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Bullshit... from the link:
The mother of an 11-year-old rural Weston girl who died of untreated diabetes says she didn't know her daughter was terminally ill as she prayed for her to get better instead of taking her to the doctor.

Madeline Neumann died Sunday from an undiagnosed and treatable form of diabetes.

Her motherNeumann, tells The Associated Press her daughter's condition worsened suddenly, and the parents stayed in prayer, believing she would recover...

Recover? From Diabetes? Either the parents are the stupidest people in the world or they tortured and killed their own child in the name of their god.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DadOf2LittleAngels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
26. Were the parents aware of diabetes?
Seriously? It is the flu season and while MomOf2LittleAngels rushes the kids in whenever an unmedicated temp or 101+ persist for more than 24 hours not everyone does that..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. if they wanted to sell that story they shouldn't have phoned relative to say child was in a coma
er, let's see, call relative and blab, oh yeah, my kid's in a coma and i'm praying for her right now!

and then claim it was a simple misjudgment? guess they didn't realize the other woman would talk about the phone call to a reporter, oopsie

what part of coma is that difficult to understand? they let the kid die and they knew the child was dying and they'd fucked up so bad that they decided to keep praying and keep fucking up

this is negligent homicide and they should be prosecuted, if the facts decribed in the articles are true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhollyHeretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:55 PM
Original message
delete dupe
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 09:58 PM by GreenJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhollyHeretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. "easily made, decision" NO it's not. You are a monster if your child is sick for 30 days
and you don't take them to see a doctor. She also went into a fucking coma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
46. But,,, but GOD told them not to do everything in their power to help a suffering child...
... the very height of inhumanity. Fuckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. I've been reading about this.. did you know
she was sick for at least a month before she died? Her parents watched her suffer for over 30 days and still never did anything. This was a case of torture, even if the kid was "religious" and thought god would save her, should those kind of judgments be left in the hands of an 11 year old? I think the parents should be charged, minimum with manslaughter, although if it were me I'd charge them with first degree murder. They watched for 30 days. Then, they let her die. Put them in jail before they have more kids to torture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
41. Did they contact their church leader? If so what were they told to do? nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. they should be charged with negligent homicide
i think the way the charge is worded depends on the D.A. but sounds like a clear cut case of negligent manslaughter/negligent homicide to me

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sounds to me like we need better education in America.. and we need
Universal Healthcare.. This way, everyone has access to medical care. Did they have insurance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lennon Donating Member (179 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Girl Dies After Parents Pray for Healing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. isn't it better to die and go to heaven than be alive on earth? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
historian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. i hope you are joking
because if not you are in dire need of a straight jacket
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhythm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
35. Missing something?!
:sarcasm: tag perhaps?
Hope so, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Somawas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. They should not be charged with anything.
They are entitled to both freedom of and free exercise of their religious beliefs, no matter how nutty such beliefs may seem. To suggest that they should be held criminally liable for their exercise of faith is a somewhat crypto-fascist attitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFriendlyAnarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yea, except someone died as a result of their belief.
They have their right to religion, but they infringed on the girls right to live. I think that manslaughter or at the very least child abuse would be appropriate. They sat and prayed as they watched their child die.

Or perhaps it was sarcasm? Some days I just can't tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Somawas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Not at all sarcatic.
I read "no law" to mean "no law."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chixydix Donating Member (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. "No law" sounds good to me...that means I can chop off their fucking hands and feet, nu?
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Somawas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #17
25. Only if it otherwise a moral or religious duty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCappedBandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. Seriously? WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #25
36. So you honestly think that there should be no laws
that prohibit people from causing death with their religion? The hijackers on 9/11 thought they were fulfilling a religious duty. People who murder gays in the name of God think that they're fulfilling a religious requirement. What about someone who takes the Old Testament advice to kill a disobedient child seriously--you think that should be permitted? Human sacrifice? Murdering abortion providers? Drowning your kids in a bathtub because "God" told you that they were tainted with evil?

All of this is your idea of acceptable? What are you, fucking Torquemada reincarnated or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Somawas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. Just a guy who
actually believes that the Constitution means what it says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. But the SCOTUS is the ultimate arbiter of the Constitution
and has not prior to this point agreed with your interpretation of religious freedom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #37
47. Ridiculous. By your interpretation, the First Amendment itself violates the First Amendment,
because it violates the Christian principle by allowing other gods to be worshiped.

The First Amendment has NEVER meant that religion means you don't need to live within secular laws. Laws are made for the government of actions, and while they cannot interfere with mere religious beliefs and opinions, they may with practices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Somawas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Not at all.

the First Amendment has jackshit to do with "Christian Principles." It has to do with the proper role of government and conscience. As in, governmen rt needs to leave conscience alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. The First Amendment defies the 10 commandments, in and of itself. The fact is laws
exist that run contrary to some religious beliefs. Those beliefs do not entitle anyone to violate the rights of another.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Somawas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. And from that you infer what?
Your mixing of legal concepts with religious ones makes no sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. Weren't you the person in a dither about "No law abridging" ?
Most laws - any law really - could be inconsistent with someone's religion.

And yet they must live within the law.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Somawas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. I'm sorry
but your logic eludes me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. they are not free to refuse to take a child in a coma to the hospital
sorry what they did was a crime

i don't care what religious horseshit they espouse, when they have a child in a coma and decide to pray (and yack on the telephone with their relatives) rather than taking the child to the emergency room, then they are criminals and need to pay a price

you don't get to kill your kid and say, oops, my colorful religious beliefs made me do it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. So I guess murder by massive stupidity is okay, huh?
That should be of great comfort to the child. Oh, wait. She's dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. uh huh
watch for a lot of wackjob religious defense if THAT is allowed to be :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. Wow
I don't know what's wrong with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhollyHeretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. So if my religious beliefs said it was OK to beat the crap out of my child that would be
fine with you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #9
28. Freedom of Religion is not a free pass to violate the rights of others, nor is it a free
pass to shirks one's legal responsibilities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Somawas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. So,
"No law abridging" doesn't really mean that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Clearly not as you understand it. Every law could potentially abridge some nutjob's religion -
but religion doesn't entitle anyone to violate another's rights.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #29
45. Your right to practice your religion ends where someone else's right to not practice it begins
so if you want to murder a person to practice your religion, you can't do that because you can't force someone else to give his/her life for your religious practice. That girl had a right to not be forced to practice the religion by dying. One could argue that she had chosen to practice the religion as well, but as a child she wasn't able to give full consent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
33. Religion is the personal excise of fantasy within exactly one person's mind
Since children by legal definition are not "free" to choose many actions or choices, the foisting of belief upon that minor by theists is just as authoritarian as that you allege by the state.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
40. religious belief is does not excuse the law....
At minimum these people should be charged with negligent homicide. They knew she was sick. And withheld medical treatment. That constitutes wanton neglect...

The bible says it us okay to beat your wife a stick no bigger than your thumb...? What about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
43. If they make the choice for themselves, yes I agree. If they choose to stand in front of
a bus, fine, but if they put their child in front of the bus, they are criminally liable. They are free to exercise their religious freedom until it causes harm to others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yikes
Dale Neumann, himself a former cop stated that he began CPR "as soon as the breath of life left" his daughter's lungs.

Authorities only became aware of the situation when a relative called 911 to seek medical attention for the girl.

"My sister-in-law, she's very religious, she believes in faith instead of doctors ...," the girl's aunt told a sheriff's dispatcher Sunday afternoon in a call from California. "And she called my mother-in-law today ... and she explained to us that she believes her daughter's in a coma now and she's relying on faith."


Whatever charges are pressed, they've already suffered a punishment worse than any that could be imposed by our courts. They'll live with this the rest of their lives... and I would not trade places with either one of them, for all the money in the world. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. There was another case in the news today - a 15 month old died. Antibiotics would've saved her.
http://www.kgw.com/news-local/stories/kgw_032908_news_faith-based_healing.1095feec.html

OREGON CITY, Ore. -- A grand jury indicted an Oregon City couple accused of failing to seek medical treatment for their gravely ill daughter who died this month.

Carl Worthington, 28, and Raylene Worthington, 25, surrendered late Friday to face charges of manslaughter and criminal mistreatment, said Detective Jim Strovink of the Clackamas County Sheriff's Office.

They were held on $250,000 bail each and their first court appearance was scheduled for Monday afternoon.

The couple's daughter, 15-month-old Ava, died at home March 2 from bacterial bronchial pneumonia and infection. A deputy state medical examiner said Ava's medical problems were treatable with antibiotics.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Looks like this wasn't an isolated case, either
The Worthingtons belong to Oregon City's Followers of Christ Church. According to church tradition, when members become ill, fellow worshippers pray and anoint them with oil.

Dozens of children have been buried in the parish cemetery over the past 50 years, and a 1998 analysis by The Oregonian newspaper found that many of the deaths could have prevented with medical care.


Disturbing, to say the least :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
historian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. similar case in mass
There was a similar case in mass where an 8 yr old boy was screaming in pain and agony for so long the neighbors finally called the police. The kid was suffering from stomach pains. He was rushed to hospital where he died, He had a blocked small intestine and the operation was relatively simple but he got there too late. The parents, who also decided to pray instead, were sentenced to 10 years for homicide. Stupid dung heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
18. No one could have predicted that talking to a non-existent deity wouldn't work.
People can be so frickin' stupid. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DadOf2LittleAngels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #18
27. Yea freedom of religion is a bitch right?
SO well only practice it when those who mock our beliefs approve...

--

FYI I gravely disagree with what the parents did, people need to remember that even the Apostles used physicians. Im pretty sure when Luke and Paul were traveling were one of them to hurt themselves they would have looked to Luke who was a physician for aid..

Faiths which preach that God can not use men (including Doctors) as tools ignore a huge amount of scripture..

--

Reminds me of a joke:

A man lives in an area that is flooding, his neighbor comes to him and says 'were driving out of here get in' and the man says 'no thanks God will save me'

Later a man comes by in a boat taking stranded people to safety and the man says 'no thanks God will save me'

Finally a helicopter is picking people off of roofs and the man says 'no thanks God will save me'

When the man dies he stands before God and says 'why didn't you save me?' and God replies:

I sent a car, a boat, and a helicopter it looked like you didn't want my help..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
32. Many years ago when I was in dental school,
there was a case at the University wherein a little girl had had a small growth internally under her eyelid. The parents brought her to the Ophthamologist who sent her for a biopsy and it showed a rhabdomyosarcoma. Treatment was to be enucleation of the orbit and some surrounding structures, which would severely disfigure the girl. Parents instead found a quack homeopath who prescribed serial dilutions, and the usual crap. The tumor of course progressed until it was a STALK GROWING OUT OF THE KID'S HEAD ATTACHED TO A BASEBALL SIZED TUMOR - the eye was competely gone.

The parents brought the child in to the hospital when she started to fail and it was too late..she died shortly thereafter.

It was the most tragic thing I have ever witnessed...the parents heard what they wanted to hear and although it was outrageous, if you saw this poor child before and after and the agony of the decision making process, which the parents handled ALL WRONG, as they say, it was just beyond tragic. I won't post the pics here which I still have but suffice it to say that it was horrendous beyond all human comprehension.

This has happened often and is always sad sad sad. We have many such stories over the years which are clinically presented and they are just head-shaking in their extreme anguish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondie58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
34. I believe in the power of prayer but I also believe
that God gave man the intelligence and knowledge to help others through medicine. Poor little girl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dembotoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
38. Prayer is Republican health insurance.
The only "universal coverage" they will ever support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. Agree. Shameful. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
44. Religion wins again - another life claimed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
52. Apparently these parents never read the parable of the Good Samaritan..
Wherein the Samaritan treats the man injured by robbers, binds his wounds, pouring oil and wine on them and then carries him to an inn and pays the innkeeper to care for him and even promises to return and pay more if the payment is not sufficient.

And the Christ called the Samaritan the "neighbor" of the injured man, as in "love thy neighbor as thyself".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC