|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
ck4829 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 07:57 PM Original message |
News you probably didn't hear about, House votes overwhelmingly against Executive Order 13233 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaPeggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
1. Maybe the "liberal" media doesn't think we should hear this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 08:19 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Or maybe the MSM thinks the public won't understand it, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clear Blue Sky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
2. Gotta get through the linguine spined senators... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
3. Two words: signing statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cui bono (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 08:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. So sad yet so true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 08:39 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. No. The Supremes actually declared a signing statement to be akin to a line item veto and therefore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elizfeelinggreat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
6. Thank You |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharesunited (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
7. Wikipedia says that the measure has not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 11:54 PM Response to Original message |
9. Without Impeachment, Congress Is Irrelevant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 01:46 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC