Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Costs soar for new Marine One fleet

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:49 PM
Original message
Costs soar for new Marine One fleet
A year after Sept. 11, 2001, the White House set out to build a fleet of state-of-the-art Marine One helicopters for the al-Qaeda age that would be safer, faster and more reliable than the iconic white-topped aircraft that have landed on the South Lawn for decades.

But the al-Qaeda age has met the military acquisition process. Six years later, the cost of the new helicopters has nearly doubled, production has fallen behind schedule, and the bulk of the program has been put on hold while the government tries to figure out how to salvage it.

The Pentagon confirmed this month that the cost of the fleet of 28 new super-sophisticated helicopters has jumped from $6.1 billion when the contract was signed in 2005 to $11.2 billion today. Outfitted with cutting-edge communications equipment, antimissile defenses and hardened hulls, each of the VH-71 helicopters, to be dubbed Marine One whenever the president is onboard, will cost $400 million. That price tag is more than the one for the most recent Boeing 747 jetliner outfitted to serve as Air Force One when it was delivered in 1990, even when adjusted for inflation.

<Big snip>

The White House has insisted the project go forward. "We took a look at what is the best thing to do for future presidents but also looking at it from a cost-benefit analysis," said White House spokesman Gordon Johndroe. "The consensus was future presidents need a new helicopter. The current ones need to be replaced." Johndroe said President Bush has no personal stake in the project because the helicopters will not be ready until after he leaves office..."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23665969/

Lockheed Martin = "No personal stake in the project". Okydokey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. No fuckin' shit, Sherlock...
(keep digging, Watson!)




Large portions of this helicoper are being made in the UK and Italy, where the doller is weak!


I bet Sikorsky Aircraft is laughing at the Pentagon right now.

And $400 million dollars EACH? For a FUCKING HELICOPTER?


Hell, V-22 Ospreys only costs $70 million each. USE THOSE INSTEAD!!!

Put in a nice executive interior, some extra soundproofing, mini-bar, a toilet, you're DONE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushmeister0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah but he toilet alone costs 10 million (gold plating etc.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MaryCeleste Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. There has been some interesting issues with the Presidential Helo, and the Marine program manager
was recently fired/relieved. I know him and the program, and in my opinion, it was a case of an impossible task for anyone to accomplish. However, he was in charge when it blew up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. Built-in bars don't come cheap.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. I thought the Navy was supposed to supply transportation for the Marines
Seriously, why does the Marine Corps have any vehicles at all. Why is our Navy the world's second largest Air Force, lagginly only slightly behind our own Air Force?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryCeleste Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. They do, sort of
Marines are part of the US Naval Forces, but are not part of the Navy. The maintain their own air capability, dedicated to support Marine infantry. That is why they have Cobras, Hueys, AV-8s, EA-6Bs V-22s, F-18s and a couple of other types I can't think of right now. The ones in common with the USN are used on a shared basis and counted on as overall naval aviation force structure.

Summary, they are part of Naval Aviation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC