Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I want to know why Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi aren't in the press or on TV

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 11:55 AM
Original message
I want to know why Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi aren't in the press or on TV
Talking to the American people about the crimes of the Booshe misAdministration, the stonewalling and filibustering by the Republicans in the House and Senate, why they haven't been on top of the mortgage crisis, FISA, oil prices, the dollar plunge, the Justice Department crisis, and let Booshe make a 200+ BILLION dollar gift to the banks?

Why aren't they leading us???? Why aren't they on the talking head shows? Why hasn't Harry Reid asked for the resignation of Larry Craig and David Vitter. Why are we leaderless???

Why are their heads stuck in the sand?????




I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore.:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Thepricebreaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Election Year... If they don't do anything, its safe....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Because they struck a deal to leave with a bundle like
the rest of the Congressional leaders since Bush, Inc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. Have you not noticed the brick wall that the House has created for Bush?
Sonofabitch! Read the fucking newspaper once in a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ben_meyers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. WHO?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Because they have absolutely nothing to say that isn't another lame excuse, a good word for Bushie..
...announcing another routine cave-in, another admission that they can't control their own party members, another lame rationale for avoiding impeachment hearings, another instance of allowing an Iraq funding bill to come to the floor although they could just as easily end the occupation by making Cheney use his own goddamn money to pay for the continued slaughter.

And then they could discuss telecom immunity, how it helps the Bushies avoid another felony charge in their endless crime wave, while "our party leaders" carefully avoid the fact that this illegal spying program began in Feb., 2001, and was not implemented as a result of "the events of 9/11(tm)" as the Bushies claim and mass media dutifully echoes.

Maybe they could get into the joys of torture, American style, which even their iron-fisted leadership couldn't prevent their members from approving.

Maybe they could explain their obsession with helping the Bushies every single time they want more latitude to spy on their own citizens, intercept all domestic electronic communications, compile endless lists of those who don't buy into the Bushie world view... and now the miserable, co-opted, complicit fools

Or they might discuss how the senate, under Reid's guidance, still couldn't avoid confirming nearly every single wingnut federalist society judge the Bushies sent to the hill, hoping to pollute the entire federal bench with insane ideologues for at least the next quarter century.

And the other big handicap they never deal with: These people are so utterly unconvincing, so inept at delivering key messages, so devoid of any style or presence, so thoroughly linked with losing causes, so lousy at their jobs and so obviously ineffectual at even the pretense of leadership...

In short, they shouldn't be allowed on TV because they don't know how to defend themselves against even the mildest GOP attack dogs.

Their best shot continues to be calling treason "disappointing," labeling stunning criminality "unfortunate," sending strongly worded letters, issuing lame statements that nobody cares about enough to give up a single column inch, and generally doing everything they can to discredit the party as a whole, disrespect the people who thought they were voting for change and instead got a couple of accommodating dipshits who couldn't lead a pack of kindergartners, and dishonor themselves by revealing publicly that they're nothing but lying politicians whose only loyalty is to their own reelections.

People want passion and fire, particularly when hatred for the Bushies is so palpable and out front. And they get a couple of pasty faced icons of everything that's wrong with the democratic party, whose passion has been extinguished by the steady flow of corporate bribes, and who come across as fiery as last week's fireplace ashes.

Other than that, I think they make amazingly ineffective advocates for the questionable positions and strategies of a truly dysfunctional political party that wouldn't know how to deliver a message even if they all moonlighted for Western Union.

I'll tell you what I really think a bit later...


wp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. i saw harry on teevee this am.....fireside chat thingy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ode to the Nancy Disaster
(Part the Fifth)

Oh, Nancy Disaster,
You never lifted a finger,
When all those kids were dying,
You are a smell that will only linger.

Oh, our Nancy Disaster,
You and Give Us Hell Harry undermined all that we were,
Oh, our Nancy Disaster,
Where would we be without her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genie_weenie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. Those in power realize they have more in common with each other
than with the people they rule... err... represent.

The never were Anti-War Congress...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. They have been wrapped up for storage and are somewhere in the back of the closet now. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC