Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

54 Words, 7 commas, and a period. The argument against warrantless spying in a nutshell

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 11:18 AM
Original message
54 Words, 7 commas, and a period. The argument against warrantless spying in a nutshell


Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.


Nowhere in the Amendment does it bow to the will of the President nor does it exempt from the requirement for a warrant based on letters issued by the FBI. In short, you have the right not to be spied upon unless a warrant is secured and the Government has no right at all to spy on you without one. It is not a difficult argument to comprehend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Weasel your way out of that one, strict constructionists!
I would love for someone to argue with me that e-mails and phone calls don't consists of "effects".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kick nt
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. It ain't rocket science. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lildreamer316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. The founding fathers were brilliant.
Just mind-blowingly brilliant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. The "founding fathers" were not responsible for the Bill of Rights.
The Federalist framers of the 1787 Constitution (let's use accurate terms here), some 67 or so slaveholders and merchants who constituted most of the richest people in the country, agreed on a system of government they felt would best express their interests as a class and protect them against what they saw as the leveling, democratic demands of the unruly, unwashed mob.

That mob was instrumental in states' rejecting the Constitution, unless it included a Bill of Rights, which the framers explicitly left out.

It was thus the FOUNDING PEOPLE who forced the Bill of Rights including the Fourth Amendment into the Constitution, against the original plans of the "founding fathers" you praise.

That Constitution still counted slaves and Indians as 3/5 of a person for census purposes (and as no person at all otherwise), allowed states to restrict the franchise to property holders, and had senators elected by state legislatures. Every progressive change in this country has come about as a result of the people fighting to force the powerful to acknowledge the rights and principles to which the powerful only originally gave lip-service. The "founding fathers" and their idea of a Republic was a big improvement on divine-right monarchy, but don't delude yourself into thinking they were interested in us, or in anything other than the power of their class, the accumulation of wealth in their hands, and the expansion of empire.

It took a big fight to free slaves, extend the franchise to women, and gain a modicum of rights and privileges for workers. It will take a big fight to end U.S. imperialism in the world.

Sadly the American people seem to know little of their own history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lildreamer316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Whoopsie.
Not what I was taught, my bad. Thanks...still, some pretty smart ppl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Well, go and find it out...
It's not a state secret that the Bill of Rights was forced on the Constitution as presented by the Federalist framers thanks to protests from the states, most of all from the anti-Federalists. You needn't feel bad if you didn't know it until now. Sorry, but it is important to understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Not so much that they were brilliant, but, they had just lived through this.
Their property was subject to random searches by soldiers looking for unspecified contraband, among other outrages.

=Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. Don't you know ~ 9-11 CHANGED EVERYTHING
:shrug: Why do you keep throwing "that Goddamned piece of paper" in their face?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Old habits die hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. our president and his vice do not care one bit about our constitution
from day one they have done everything possible to undermine it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. It makes one wonder how they remain in office, doesn't it?
Or does it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. Oh, the Habeas Corpus thingie? That is SOOO Eleventh century
Edited on Thu Mar-13-08 12:48 PM by librechik
Bushie erased that, and Harry hasn't been able to put it back in yet. Hasn't even tried, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. Don't let your broker use a phone for trading your stocks.
Nor should you use a phone to announce, recommend, nor should the people managing your retirement account use a phone, email, nor fax.

Because nothing stops the BFEE from making money off stock moves. NOTHING.

Remember when some Republican Congress-critter had day trading computers in his Congressional office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. The neocons would like you to think the people they call terrorists aren't people.
At least, not under the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. They did the same thing with blacks, Indians, Hispanics, Italians...
Communists, Japanese-Americans, German-Americans, etc....

Face it, the "neocons" are the same xenophobic characters who have been running things since... well, since America began.

And they've been using the same tactics - fear, misinformation and demonization.

In 10 years, there'll be ANOTHER hated racial group.

My prediction? Asians. More specifically, the Chinese.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
margotb822 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. Too bad * thinks the Constitution is only a "GD piece of paper"
unless it suits him and his cronies, of course!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Borrowing from "Legal Weapon II," the Constitution done been revoked by executive,
legislative, and judicial fiat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
17. The Constitution Is A Muscle -- Use It Or Lose It
Failure to exercise the Impeachment Clause causes the rest to atrophy.

The decrepit DC Dems need a course in Principles Pilates (and a good Cranial-Rectoscopist).

Impeachment is our ONLY moral, patriotic option.

---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC