Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conyers releases Simpson transcript.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 09:21 AM
Original message
Conyers releases Simpson transcript.
Short synopsis here:
http://www.speaker.gov/blog/?p=833

Entire transcript here:
http://www.speaker.gov/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/jillsimpsoninterviewwithexhibits.pdf
174 pages, but doubled spaced and lots of white space.

I was surprised to learn the she did NOT want to file the original affidavit last year.
She did it because after consulting with some other attorneys she was afraid she might in violation of state bar rules/ethics, etc.
I think she was covering her butt and then things just got out of hand and now she's riding the tiger and can't let go.

Interesting too that Rob Riley (Gov. Bob Riley's son) has basically said of Jill Simpson, "Who?". See the copies of letters, faxes, and emails from him to her in the pdf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Under oath and with telephone logs
Hello,

Alabama GOP, Judge Fuller, and Karl Rove want to answer some questions?


Ms. Simpson described a 2005 conversation with Rob Riley in which Mr. Riley stated that, in late 2004, Karl Rove had contacted the Public Integrity Section of the Department of Justice to press for further prosecution of Don Siegelman, and had also stated that the case would be assigned to a federal judge who “hated” Mr. Siegelman and who would “hang Don Siegelman.”


snip

* Ms. Simpson identified telephone records reflecting the November 18, 2002, call described in her May 21, 2007, affidavit. She also identified other phone calls between her and Rob Riley during the 2002 campaign season, and identified a series of letters showing that she has regularly worked on legal matters with Mr. Riley since 1998.


* Ms. Simpson testified that she is a lifelong Republican, who has worked on political campaigns for Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush, Judge Roy Moore of Alabama, and Governor Bob Riley of Alabama, among others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. For a moment, I thought this was a crosspost from Entertainment, about Homer's latest antics.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. I thought of those Simpsons, too.
GMTA,eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Me too! My first thought was...
Conyers was on The Simpsons? :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Silly me. :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Support the ACLU Donating Member (65 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks for posting this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. K & R and X-post.
Political Prisoner Don Siegelman: Will the 60 Minutes Spotlight Make a Difference?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2909551
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. And there it is. Bald as you like it. Will it be pursued?
Just how criminal is too criminal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
7. k&r mukasey will do shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
8. k&r mukasey will do shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellipsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. Fuller is toast, ...and I'd guess Rob Riley will be subpoenaed. (SERIOUS STUFF HERE)
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 03:10 PM by btmlndfrmr
Transcript snips


Page 22

Q Okay. And did someone express a concern that the pictures should be made public anyhow to prevent having an impact on Mr. Siegelman's political future?
A They did. And that was Rob Riley.


Q Okay. And what did he say about that?
A He said that he felt they should go to the press with the pictures, but there was some disagreement about that.

Q Okay. And what was that disagreement?
A Bill Canary said that in order, basically, to get this over with, that not to worry, that Don -- that his


Page 23

girls would get him. Let's just go ahead and get this election contest over with, I guess would be the best way, you know. Because Rob kept saying, I want Don Siegelman not to run. They were talking over each other in that particular -- I don't want to face -- we don't want to face Don in running again in the future. And Bill said -- and that part didn't exactly make it into my affidavit. But Bill said, "Rob, don't worry. My girls are getting him, will take care of him." But he said, "Let's get this election contest behind us."

Q I understand.
A And Rob was going, well, I think we need to go to the press. So there was some kind of conversation about that.

Q As you've said. And by him, Bill Canary meant Don Siegelman; that's what you understood?
A Yes. He said not to worry about Don Siegelman; you know what I mean?

Q Yes.
A That his girls would take care of him.



Page 25

Q Can you describe that part of the conversation?
A Well, what he said -- Bill Canary told him not to worry. He had already got it taken care of with Karl. And that Karl had spoken to the Justice Department and the Justice Department was already pursuing Don Siegelman.

Q And did you know who he meant by Karl?
A I did.



Page 26

Q Who did you think he meant?
A Karl Rove.

Q Did he ever say Karl Rove?
A No. But I knew from conversations that I had had with Rob that Bill Canary was very connected to Karl Rove. Additionally, there was some talk -- and that's not in my affidavit -- about Karl had -- about Washington; that Karl had it taken care of in Washington. I mean, as I said, I couldn't put everything down. I put the best I could, but I didn't write every single word that occurred in that. So I understood that to be -- and the only Karl I knew involved in Rob's conversation was Karl Rove. So that's how I understood it.

Q And what was the additional talk that you say isn't reflected here about Washington?
A Well, the additional part of that was, as I understood, Karl had been over to the Justice Department.

Q There is some reference -- he had physically gone there?
A That's what I understood.


Page 51

Q And is your understanding, then, that the conversation between Bob Riley and Bill Canary and Karl Rove would have occurred sometime in 2004?
A I understood -- whenever Alice's case was over -- which we had the discussion -- I don't know when it was over, but I think it was in October or September from what I've been told. But sometime between when that case had ended and when -- and I kind of understood from what --


Page 52

Q Okay. And did Rob give you the name of the person at -- I'm just going to call it Public Integrity -- that he thought he understood Karl Rove had spoken to?
A No, he said it was the head guy there and he said that that guy had agreed to allocate whatever resources, so evidently the guy had the power to allocate resources, you know.

Q To the Siegelman prosecution?
A Yes. And that he'd allocate all resources necessary.

Q And did Rob -- well, did you discuss anything else about the reason to bring the case or the decision to bring the case in the Middle District?
A Oh, yes.

Q And what is that?
A I asked Rob why we needed to bring it in that area. And, of course, he mentioned Leura Canary, Bill Canary's wife, would be a good reason as to why to bring it. But he also mentioned Mark Fuller.


Page 56

Q And what did you learn at that time?
A Rob told me that Mark Fuller was still a government contractor in 2005 and a United States Federal judge, which I found unusual.

Q Did he discuss with you any of the types of contracts that Mark Fuller was working?
A Yes, he did.

Q What did he say about that?
A He said that Fuller was doing fuel contracts, that he was doing maintenance contracts, that he was doing clothing contracts. He -- he makes flight suits. So you know. And he had Air Force and Navy and that he was -- did contracts with the FBI.

Q Okay.
A And I think the ATF, but -- I'm pretty sure he said the ATF also, but I'm not sure.

Q And did he talk to you about Mark Fuller's politics or political work?
A He did.

Q What did you talk about in that regard?
A I asked him -- he made a statement that Fuller would hang Don Siegelman. And I asked him how he knew that, if he got him in his court. And he said that Fuller was -- had



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellipsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC