This is the bigest load of crap I have EVER seen. No community advocacy group I've heard of ever had a problem with lenders denying credit on the basis of bad credit. Redlining is a whole different problem.
But here it is - enjoy the whore-age....
http://www.nypost.com/php/pfriendly/print.php?url=http://www.nypost.com/seven/02052008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/the_real_scandal_243911.htmTHE REAL SCANDAL
By STAN LIEBOWITZ
February 5, 2008 -- PERHAPS the greatest scandal of the mortgage crisis is that it is a direct result of an intentional loosening of underwriting standards - done in the name of ending discrimination, despite warnings that it could lead to wide-scale defaults.
....
In the 1980s, groups such as the activists at ACORN began pushing charges of "redlining" - claims that banks discriminated against minorities in mortgage lending. In 1989, sympathetic members of Congress got the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act amended to force banks to collect racial data on mortgage applicants; this allowed various studies to be ginned up that seemed to validate the original accusation.
In fact, minority mortgage applications were rejected more frequently than other applications - but the overwhelming reason wasn't racial discrimination, but simply that minorities tend to have weaker finances.
Yet a "landmark" 1992 study from the Boston Fed concluded that mortgage-lending discrimination was systemic.
That study was tremendously flawed - a colleague and I later showed that the data it had used contained thousands of egregious typos, such as loans with negative interest rates. Our study found no evidence of discrimination.Visit link for full hack-job...
http://www.nypost.com/php/pfriendly/print.php?url=http://www.nypost.com/seven/02052008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/the_real_scandal_243911.htm