Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Happened w/ FISA Bill Yesterday?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
vanlassie Donating Member (826 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:13 AM
Original message
What Happened w/ FISA Bill Yesterday?
I'm out of the loop a bit right now.
vanlassie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Me too, crooksandliars.com has this pic ...


so I'm not too sure I'm gonna like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TooBigaTent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. Senate Dems tried to push a version WITHOUT immunity for corps that aided
spying but that failed, with the help of several traitorous Democrats.

They would just not allow that alternative to get a hearing. The result is that the "bad" version is still alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanlassie Donating Member (826 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. So Calls To Senators are Still In Order. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. YES! Called yesterday and at least the staffer with whom I spoke had a clear understanding of the
Leahy amendment.

I hate when I call and the staffer says, "What? I hadn't heard about that"

MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. the judiciary version that had no immunity got voted down
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 11:18 AM by LSK
So the intelligence version with the immunity goes forward in the Senate.

The House version does not have immunity and the bill could stall there again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. Booman has the best synopsis of what happened so far
The Senate voted 60-36 yesterday to table (kill) the Judiciary Committee's (SJC) version of the FISA bill. Then things got interesting. The Republicans repeatedly refused to grant unanimous consent to consider amendments to the underlying Senate Select Intelligence Committee's (SSCI) version of the FISA bill. Then Minority Leader Mitch McConnell filed a cloture motion to cut off debate and force a vote on the SSCI version. The vote on cloture is scheduled for 4:30 on Monday, only a few hours before the president's State of the Union speech. As I understand it (via Tagaris), there would be one pending amendment if cloture is successfully invoked (by prior agreement) and that would be a Dodd-Feinstein amendment related to blanket warrants.

A couple of points here. First, the Republicans got 60 votes to table the SJC bill, so they can presumably get 60 votes to override Senator Dodd's filibuster of the SSCI bill. In fact, as both John McCain and Lindsay Graham did not vote yesterday, the Republicans can presumably get 62 votes to override Senator Dodd's filibuster. But things are not so simple.

Yes, it is true that twelve Democrats crossed the aisle to kill the SJC bill, but they didn't agree to cut off all debate (and amendments) on the SSCI bill. I don't think the Democrats anticipated that the Republicans would snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Had the Republicans allowed up or down votes on the various amendments, they had the votes to kill any amendment that stripped telco immunity from the bill and to override any filibuster. In other words, they could have won. But, apparently, they do not have faith that they can defeat other amendments that are unacceptable to the administration. Therefore, they objected to letting those amendments come to the floor.

more on his analysis of what may happen next
http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2008/1/25/1490/54121
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. thanks for that summary - by the way, on cspan2 right now n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC