Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rep. Jerrold Nadler Is Blocking Impeachment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:28 PM
Original message
Rep. Jerrold Nadler Is Blocking Impeachment
Source: After Downing Street

Submitted by davidswanson on Thu, 2008-01-24 01:33. Impeachment

By David Swanson

A private off-the-record meeting was held on Capitol Hill on Wednesday that included House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, Subcommittee on the Constitution Chairman Jerrold Nadler, Judiciary Committee Member and advocate for opening Cheney impeachment hearings Robert Wexler, and several other committee members, activists, staffers, and former staffers from the Watergate days. I wasn't there, so I'm free to talk about what happened.

Wexler proposed opening impeachment hearings on Cheney. Conyers committee staffer Perry Appelbaum laid out instead a schedule for non-impeachment hearings over the coming 11 months. Conyers' notion is to hold non-impeachment hearings on "the imperial presidency" and run out the clock. I guess that would be sort of like a dozen police officers paying a non-arresting visit to the home of a mass murderer. Seriously? An "imperial" president, and you don't impeach him, and you don't retire or commit suicide? This baffles me.

The chief opponent of impeachment hearings was not Conyers. It was Nadler. Nadler argued strongly against any use of the I word. He argued that Congress should focus on passing bills, even though they will be vetoed, and then pass them again next year.

Arguing for keeping open the possibility of impeachment hearings developing out of the non-impeachment hearings was Salt Lake City Mayor Rocky Anderson. Daniel Ellsberg was also among those backing impeachment hearings.

Read more: http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/30384



This is sad and bizarre.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Have contact info for Nadless Nadler? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dupe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Non Impeachment Hearing"? Is that like going to the doctor for a non-illness? n/t
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. He's supposed to be a progressive Democrat, isn't he?
Aren't shrub and the neocons sort of the anti-progressives? WTF? Why is he blocking?

Do they have to draw straws to see who has to do the dirty work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rsmith6621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Conyers has turned out to be a dissapointment


..........he along with Reid and the madam Speaker should pack thier bags and go home.....their two facers.










Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. They will need two bags, one for each of their faces.

I am so sick of "Democrats" with no spine and no loyalty to the people who voted them in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. They will need two bags, one for each of their faces.
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 06:50 PM by DemBones DemBones
I am so sick of "Democrats" with no spine and no loyalty to the people who voted them in.

Well, that posted twice but I'm leaving it -- it deserves saying twice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Conyers hands are tied by Pelosi. He stood up when it was even more dangerous than now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm thinking the invasion of the body snatchers really DID happen!
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 06:51 PM by balantz
At least in congress!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudythescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. Everyone from NY especially -- pressure Michio Kaku (WBAI Weds 5pm) to run against Nadler! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC