Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WTF? Sen. Rockefeller predicts Senate will grant retroactive immunity to telecom companies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:15 AM
Original message
WTF? Sen. Rockefeller predicts Senate will grant retroactive immunity to telecom companies

http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/0108/Rockefeller_predicts_win_in_FISA_fight_over_telecom_immunity.html

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) is predicting the Senate will grant retroactive immunity to telecommunications companies as Congress takes up reauthorization of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).

Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.) and other Democrats, however, are not backing down on their promise to filibuster the FISA bill over this issue.

...

"I think we will prevail," Rockefeller said on Wednesday, adding that he hoped the Senate will finish the bill by next week. The FISA legislation expires in February, and both President Bush and GOP congressional leaders have demanded new legislation be in place by that time.

...

Rockefeller defended the actions of the telecom companies, arguing that the companies received explicit orders from the National Security Agency to cooperate with the super-secret surveillance effort. The West Virginia Democrat said the telecom companies were being "pushed by the government, compelled by the government, required by the government to do this. And I think in the end, we'll prevail."

Rockefeller added: "If people want to be mad, don't be mad at the telecommunications companies, who are restrained from saying anything at all under the State Secrets Act. And they really are. They can't say whether they were involved, they can't go to court, they can't do anything. They're just helpless. And the president was just having his way."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. What do our candidates have to say about this issue?
Where do they stand on immunity for the telcos?

I know Obama is against it.

What have Edwards and Hillary said about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Edwards asked yesterday that we support Dodd in his filibuster...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. "They can't go to court, they can't do anything." And still Rockefeller capitulates.
What an asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. lololol
that's fucking laughable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. You don't really think the wiretaps were on terror suspects, do you?
;)

When someone is holding files on you and there might be some really damaging items in those files, you go along. That is the lesson cheney has taught the corporations he wants cooperation for. He gives them tools too when he gets tools for himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. Where is Hillary on the issue ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. Rockefeller is, er, um
a Rockefeller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Direct great-grandson and named for ole John D. himself.
But let's call him Jay cuz he's one of us...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC