Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Apparently Huckabee is a socialist.. (do Freepers even know about dictionaries?)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 02:43 PM
Original message
Apparently Huckabee is a socialist.. (do Freepers even know about dictionaries?)
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 02:45 PM by SoCalDem
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1957764/posts


To: DogandPonyShow

Now someone else needs to step up and take out that socialist Huckabee.

16 posted on 01/22/2008 11:20:28 AM PST by Gipper08 (a real conservative for Congress... Aaronhankins.com)

....................................

To: tpanther

I still believe that there will be a brokered convention.
And that Dick Cheney will be the GOP candidate & next POTUS.

now lets seeeeeeeeeeeee...who will be the VP?
Ann Coulter?
Mark Levin?
Laura Ingraham?

BIG SMILE!

43 posted on 01/22/2008 11:23:25 AM PST by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)

..................................

This 211 reply thread is a hoot.. There is much gnashing of teeth (up to 18 per noggin, I'm guessing), and wailing about Poor half-dead Fred..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. How the f*** is Huckabee a Socialist???
F*** dictionaries...they need a whole Polisci class to get their dumb asses in order...oh wait...edumacated peeple are stoopid!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
water Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Far f rom socialist, but he is the furthest left on fiscal policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Just as Hillary and Obama are far from "Liberal"...but try teaching them anything
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
water Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Currect, they are both center/left, with Obama being closer to the center...
... and probably even closer during the general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. No. No, they are not. Neither is Edwards.
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 03:18 PM by YOY
Sorry to disappoint. All three are Center-Right actually.



Really only Kucinich and Gravel are "Left"...As much as I like them they are "too left."

Please note that Ron Paul is truly "apeshit" according to the compass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
water Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Give me a break!
That chart is meaningless without the criteria. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Actually it's completely meaningful. I didn't make it up and it's not out of the left field.
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 03:33 PM by YOY
It's just how it is... :shrug: Pretty mainstream information based on stance. Take a look at the European comparisons if you don't believe me.

http://www.politicalcompass.org/usprimaries2008

Here's 2004 as well:


What is really "Right" and "Left" in a world that is balanced is beyond most folks in this country as we often fail to use other systems as a means of comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
water Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. It's a ridiculous chart.
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 03:48 PM by water
It doesn't leave any room for true extremists. Where would a Stalin, Hitler, or Mussolini fit in? What about a hardcore libertarian/capitalist like Ayn Rand? Not nearly far enough away from any of those people.

In addition, but as a much smaller issue, it doesn't take into account the political landscape of each person. In an economically far-left country, someone wanting to change things towards capitalism would still appear as a far-left figure on that chart! It should be taking into account which direction the views would take their countries, not their current political platforms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. You didn't go to the site did you? If you take the test you will see Stalin, Pol Pot, Ghandi etc...
It shows exactly where they fit in. This is simple universally agreed upon PoliSci.

The site and the science behind it are absolutely dead on. The FAQs answer your question and others.

Take the test and find out but please do not continue to insult me for showing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
water Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #35
47. I did go to the site.
I know that Stalin, Hitler, etc. will sit somewhere on the chart; my point is that their views differ far too much from those on the chart compared to their distance (and compared to how close the existing people are too each other.

The right-axis is economics. How the hell is Ron Paul barely in front of McCain? It's flawed, and not "universally accepted".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. Why the hell are you arguing with me about this? Most PoliSci studies would agree with the compass.
Edited on Wed Jan-23-08 09:11 AM by YOY
Have you ever taken a course in it? You really shouldn't be arguing with me about it. Feel free to send the compass creators a piece of your mind.

I have a feeling you never have. It is no where near a flawed as you want it to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
39. the weakness
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 04:26 PM by Two Americas
The weakness of the chart is that it mixes in "cultural war" issues, which have nothing to do with politics, with political issues.

Power and economics are what politics have always been about.

We have many Democrats who are "far left" on the cultural war issues, but deeply and profoundly conservative on true political concerns of power and economics.

Huckabee, while "far right" on the cultural war issues, is to the left of many Democrats on real political issues.

Republicans are moving into the vaccuum left by the Deomcratic party's abandonment of Labor and the poor (which now includes just about all of us in the country, or soon will.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Take it up with the theorists
I personally disagree...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. theorists?
Such as FDR? That is whose ideas are informing my opinion here.

I am talking hard nosed practical politics, not theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. The folks who made the political compass...it's their "theory" to assign schools of political though
thusly...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. agreed
And it is congruent with modern notions about politics, as corrupted and defined by decades of extreme right wing propaganda and the creation and use of "cultural war" issues by the Republicans to gain power. That does not mean that we must accept those premises, and I would maintain that by accepting them we are a long ways down the road to surrendering to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. And You Wonder Why the Pendulum Always Swings to the Right?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. Look at Mittens. As close to the Authoritarian absolute as possible.
Yeesh. Romney is the worst of the lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. But, if you listen to Rush and his Ditto-Head Army
Hillary & Obama are radical socialists, bordering on being commies and that the Democratic Party is way, way, way to the left of where they were in the 1960s.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Yes, but they're assholes
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 03:47 PM by YOY
I know from experience and that I used to be an asshole before I actually learned that people from other countries actually have higher standards of life and DAMN me! I wanted the same for my country!

Damn you passport! Damn you to hell!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
water Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Conservatives seem to like Obama (read: he has a chance).
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 03:49 PM by water
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. Barack Hussein Obama, the Muslim educated in a radical Madrassas?
The only Democrat I've heard Rush express anything positive for has been Kucinich. And, that was because - according to Rush - Kucinich spoke his mind and would take firm stances on the issues, while the other Democrats wouldn't take any strong stands on anything. Again, that was Rush and this was before Biden, Dodd & Richardson had dropped out of the race.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
46. No. No. No he isn't.
A flat sales tax is more regressive than any other candidate's tax plan. Huckabee pays lip service to "populism," but he is a rich man's wet dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. A repuke posted on another site I frequent, that he & McCain are both democrats.
After I corrected her, she began referring to them as Republicrats :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. dictionaries don't help those who cannot read. my question is, "do they even have two
brain cells that arc?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots!"
wow. Irony runs deep over there.

I love how this crowd never takes responsibility for their own actions or failures. Bush - who they defended forever - is now considered a Liberal along with Nixon by many of these clowns. I've seen them call Clinton a Socialist too! Jeez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. Freepers' posts always
seem like parody to me. I can't take them seriously.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. They are anti-intellectuals - dictionaries are against the rules. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's funny but a little bit scary, too.
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 02:55 PM by crim son
What in the name of gawd do they find to admire in Fred? Also, "popen borders"? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. He's a mooooovie star like Reagan..and he's "dreamy" and he dated a CW singer
and he talks with a southern accent like the guys from "Dukes of Hazzard":shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. That's the thing. He could act Presidential enough to fool them
into thinking he was good at it, like Reagan did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. and wouldn't you know.. all the best writers were on strike..
He couldn't get scripts..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
38. Very astute observation!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. "Socialist"= everything that we don't like. It's a special dictionary - they teach in speacial ed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KillCapitalism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. Well, he complained about big corporations...
so he has to be a pinko Commie right? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. Proof positive these people are psycho...
Dick Cheney the next POTUS? He's about as popular as scabies. Hell, he's about as friendly as scabies.

Nobody wants to have a beer with Cheney, especially if he's anywhere near a shotgun.

Freepers are the kind of people that morons pity.

Bleh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
water Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. Yeah, what the hell about Cheney is... good?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #29
45. some freepers think he's a rock-star..and even sexy
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bok_Tukalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. Huckabee is a heretic in the Republican Party
He has expressed concern for the plight of the poor and working class in this nation.


Also, in order to balance the budget in Arkansas, and comply with a court order on education, he raised taxes which to the modern Republican makes you worse than Stalin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. He's actually a true conservative christian..
and the freeps are all used to the fake ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. I think that is correct. He might actually believe in giving things to the poor.
Probably not, but he might, and that's too much of a risk for the Republican Party to take. Huckabee will never get the nomination. The corporations need a corporatist in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. He might be a convenient V.P. candidate..
they'll need somebody to throw a bone to the rw fundies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. I agree - I see Huckabee
as a VP candidate for either Romney or McCain so he can help gin up the Fundie vote. We know they won't turn out for a Mormon like Romney, and they don't trust McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
17. Dictionaries are communist
That Webster was a fellow traveler.:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
32. Are they CCTL?
Are dictionaries "Communists Calling Themselves Liberals?"

That's a new catch phrase. I learned it on Free Republic. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LondonReign2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
36. Once, Huckabee didn't rape and pillage to the fullest possible extent
To Freeptards, that means he is a Socialist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
37. It depends on where you're standing.
To Conservatives, Huckabee is a Socialist, and Hillary and Obama are Communists, and Moveon.org is a radical organization.

To some who are farther to the left, Huckabee is a fascist, and Hillary and Obama are Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #37
44. yes
From the top of the economic scale, they all look like socialists. From the bottom, they all look like aristocrats and royalty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC