Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AFP: Separated-at-birth twins get married

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bleacher Creature Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 01:59 PM
Original message
AFP: Separated-at-birth twins get married
This is so nasty that I couldn't resist posting.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080111/wl_uk_afp/britainchildrenadoptionmarriage

LONDON (AFP) - Twins who were separated at birth and adopted by different sets of parents later married each other without realising they were brother and sister, a peer has told the House of Lords.

David Alton, an independent, pro-life member of the Lords, said the brother and sister were granted an annulment after a high court judge ruled that the marriage had never validly existed.

The Catholic politician -- who discovered the case after talking to a judge -- used it to highlight perceived deficiencies in the government's proposed Human Embryology and Tissues Bill, which is currently going through parliament

<SNIP>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's not nasty; they had no idea and got an annulment when they
found out. Bizarre, yes! Weird they found each other...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Actually, there are several documented cases in the US during the slavery era.
Siblings would be separated from families at birth, then find each other later in life. There are some studies on it. I wish I had time to hunt them down for you. Very strange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Also nothing inherently wrong with it beyond an "ick" factor
as long as there are no nasty genetic diseases running in the birth families. Genetic counseling should have been the first step.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC