Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is This Front-Loading Of The Primaries Creating A Bandwagon Effect ???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 03:10 PM
Original message
Is This Front-Loading Of The Primaries Creating A Bandwagon Effect ???
Take a look at the 2nd (Iowa), 3rd (New Hampshire), and 4th (South Carolina) polling charts here:

Link: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/charts/2008_election_primaries/democratic_primaries_chart.html

These are charts that average the significant polls together. And the Iowa poll average had Edwards coming in 3rd!

Clinton still leads nationally, but state by state could change with each new primary.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm afraid so;
a broken bandwagon, I think.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. People like to vote for a winner.
Sometimes, that is the primary (pun not intended) motivation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think that's the idea.
Edited on Sat Jan-05-08 03:20 PM by sfexpat2000
We're so manipulated anymore, how surprising is that? :shrug:

/ack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Could very well be,
However I think that the biggest reason why the primaries were front loaded was to favor the person with the biggest pocketbook, ie Hillary. However I think that this tactic backfired on her, and she's going to pay the heavy price.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. That was the plan... kind of happened with Kerry
I think the expectation was it would happen for Sen Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Uh, hell YES!!!
The media is telling us it is all over on Tuesday, didn't you get the memo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. The Media Is Pushing for a Premature Closure
They want the primary season over and done with so they can go back to what they do best:

NOTHING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Funny Thing Is, The State Parties Did This, Not The Media
No fan of the media, but I think both parties are gonna have to figure another way in the future.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I am Referring to the Media Coverage and the Media Determining the Debators
The primary schedule is stupid, but the media is also pushing candidates off the stage after one straw poll in Iowa, an attempt to dictate to the voters if ever there was one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yep! vast majority make up their minds based on last minute MSM frontpages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. Of course it is. It also reduces voter participation in selecting candidates.
Edited on Sat Jan-05-08 08:16 PM by tom_paine
Elites of both parties want this. They want the peasants good and caged and unrepresented when it comes time for them to hire one-half of us to kill the other half.

Hence, the shutting down of The Old American Republic, and the "puzzling" complicity of our Democratic Leadership with perhaps two dozen notable exceptions and Ron Paul (whatever you think about his personal views, he sure isn't a Bushie Toady).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC