Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Look to W, not Hil, for 'sorry'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 07:27 AM
Original message
Look to W, not Hil, for 'sorry'
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/499486p-421108c.html

02/21/07
Mike Lupica

"Now that Sen. Hillary Clinton is running for President there is this idea she is supposed to apologize because she ran with the crowd in 2002 and voted for George Bush's war in Iraq. "



John Edwards goes after Clinton on this in a big way, Edwards mostly saying he was wrong now with his own vote to authorize the war as a way of getting some kind of early advantage on her.
Sen. Barack Obama goes after her, too, reminding everybody he was against the war in '02 as a state senator from Illinois, which was somewhat like voicing opposition from the bleachers at Wrigley Field.
>
She should say she will apologize right after Vice President Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, the fired secretary of defense, do the same.Hillary Clinton should apologize for her war vote when this President apologizes for anything, for all the dead and all the wounded, for all the reasons he gave and is still giving for this war. Hillary Clinton can admit she was wrong right after Gen. Colin Powell admits he was wrong to throw in with Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld on this war, and the trumped-up reasons for entering into it, in the first place.
>

Clinton was wrong once, the way Edwards was wrong, and Sen. Joe Biden, and Sen. Christopher Dodd. This administration, on the other hand, has been wrong for years, from the time this President first started beating the drums for this war on the first anniversary of Sept. 11.
>

Not Hillary Clinton's war. Theirs. It is theirs. She didn't make the world more dangerous than it already was. They did. You want an apology? They go first.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ForFuxakes Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is it really so hard
For her to be humble an admit a mistake. How many average americans knew it was wrong from the get go, but b/c she played the odds and got caught, she now expects "W" to go first...yeah right, fat chance. At least Edwards has the decency to say..."I was wrong". You might think that Hillary has learned from her hubby's mistakes (only appologized after he got caught. (BTW, i could care less about what he did, just sayin it might have turned out differently)). I for one am sick and tired of politicians pretending that they are above a simple apology. Americans are a forgiving bunch, but for her to align herself with Bush and be so damn defiant makes me sick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. She collaborated. She enabled. She still is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. An enabler is one thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Mike, you moran, you just do't get it.
How can she say that THEY were wrong, if she doesn't admit to being wrong herself?

Whatever her reasons for supporting the IWR, refusing to acknowledge it was a mistake is saying "Nobody could have predicted that the president would take it as an authorization to attack"; "No one could have predicted that the we would find the intelligence to be so wrong"; "No one could imagine that the president would not take it back to the UN".

Those were all predicted - just ignored, by her.

Edwards isn't using his apology as a way of getting a one-up on Clinton; he's using it as a club to beat the administration. He's saying, "I gave them the benefit of the doubt, and they betrayed my trust. I will not do that again."

By not apologising, Clinton is saying, well, I don't know what the hell she is saying. That the administration was right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC