Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Most vacuous, NON hard-hitting, useless TV "journalist" today:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 09:43 PM
Original message
Poll question: Most vacuous, NON hard-hitting, useless TV "journalist" today:
There's just too many of these anti-Murrows today to list in one poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Other: Gracie Jane... I mean Nancy Grace. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. "Burn her , she's a witch!" thank goodness Nancy and flaming nostrils o justice
weren't around in during the Salem Witch trials, i'm pretty sure if she was there would have been no inhabitants left to populate the east coast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Surely even she can't be pretending to be anything but a tabloid reporter(?)
or whatever people who host crap like that are called? :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. While, I do my fair share of criticizing the Media,
and do belive they warrant criticism at times, I also
try to remember John Dean(Watergate Fame or Infamy--take
your choice.

There was a panel discussion on C-Span. John Dean was on
the panel. He was asked a question regarding the Media.
Why the Media appears to either avoid covering certain
stories or reporting tough pieces, asking hard questions
of the WH and Adm in particular.
John Dean explained there is he believes a certain amount
of fear on the part of journalists. This is a very tightly
run ADM. especially when it comes to the Press. If they
report too negatively, they fear retaliation. Lose their
source at the WH, for example. No story, long enough No Job.

People have been fired over reports. They have to raise
their families too.

To me this says much more about our Democracy than Journalists.

Do not, however, be surprised if I am on the attack
tomorrow. I cannot be good all the time. Sometimes
they deserve it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Everyone listed is making a huge salary thanks to
their willingness to obey their corporate masters. No boat rockers in that crowd.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. I vote for Tim Russert
He's downright dangerous, and worse than the ones mentioned above because he's a flaming hypocrite who pretends to be a hard-hitting journalist while giving the Bushies every advantage he can:
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Time%20for%20change/31
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheWhoMustBeObeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. Agree 100%, plus he's much higher profile
Meet The Press is an institution that gives him much more weight than any of those others - more than all of them put together. Russert acts like he inherited the mantle of Huntley & Brinkley, but he's not much better than Tony Snow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yes, and it's not quite fair to say they're ALL useless
Keith Olberman, Bill Moyers, Jon Stewart and Steven Colbert especially come to mind.

I personally believe that Keith played a major role in the 2006 elections -- counteracting a lot of the crap that passes for journalism these days. Without him we would have less seats in the House, probably would have lost the Senate, and may have lost the House as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bukowski Fan Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. While saying "they're all useless"
would be my knee-jerk reaction, I'd have to say Greta Van Sustern seems to me to be a little above the rest. First off, she, along with Colmes, is always the first one mentioned among FNC's "liberal newscasters". This just adds to the hilarity that everytime I watch her show (which has been very few times) she is always covering the stupidest shit. I remember when that white girl in Bermuda thing was going down, her show was like non-stop coverage about it for months and months.

That's why, despite the fact that they are all indeed useless, Greta Van Sustern rises above the rest as FNC's liberal shitcaster. Bringing you the stories, no one really cares about, but it seems like everyone is talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Paula Zahn: Fart Or Poison?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synnical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't know who most of those people are
Can't vote. I hate it when that happens!

-Cindy in Fort Lauderdale
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k_jerome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. that blonde dude on msnbc with the deep voice. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. Diane Sawyer gets my vote
She repeatedly uses the most idiotic interview tactic I've ever encountered:

Sawyer: Mr. Bush, did you lie to the American people about the reasons for invading Iraq?

Dubya: Gosh, no!


What does she hope to accomplish by asking such an obvious, ham-fisted, and easily deflected question? Does she really think that, faced with Sawyer's overwhelming presence, the President will crumble and admit his wrong-doing?

And she does the same thing again and again, no matter who she's interviewing and no matter what the circumstances.

Awful. Was she ever an actual journalist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
11. So many mediawhores, so little time...
no way to choose just one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
13. The 'They're ALL useless' option is useless
No shit they are all useless, but the question is who is the most useless out of the useless.

Katie Couric is definately my choice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
14. Candy COWley





Of CNN.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC