Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Richardson has promised, he would engage, persuade and seek common ground with the rest of the world

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 10:40 AM
Original message
Richardson has promised, he would engage, persuade and seek common ground with the rest of the world
Personal Touch for Richardson in Envoy Role

By Jodi Kantor
New York Times

Friday 21 December 2007

{snip}

Richardson, 60, is seeking the Democratic presidential nomination, running not only on his years as an elected official - he was a congressman from New Mexico and is now governor - but also on his parallel career, as a self-appointed and official diplomat. He argues that no Democratic candidate has as much international experience and puts withdrawal from Iraq at the center of his pitch. A recent New York Times/CBS poll puts him a distant fourth in Iowa, New Hampshire and nationally, leading to speculation that he could end up as a vice-presidential nominee or in a cabinet post.

A kind of at-large dealmaker, Mr. Richardson does not specialize in any one region of the world, and he has no landmark achievement - no Dayton Accords or Middle East breakthrough - to his name. He is not associated with one school of foreign policy thinking or set of positions; in fact, he says he was wrong about the first invasion of Iraq (which he opposed), the second (which he supported), as well as the North American Free Trade Agreement, which he helped pass.

Instead, Mr. Richardson practices diplomacy as contact sport, whizzing from country to country, conflict to conflict, and charming, insulting, even touching his way through negotiations. (After he persuaded Saddam Hussein in 1995 to release two American aerospace workers who had wandered into Iraq, Mr. Richardson reached over to clap the dictator on the arm, causing Mr. Hussein's men to reach for their guns.)

He is a singular creation: a governor whose mobile phone trills with calls from North Korean officials; a former United Nations ambassador who wore cowboy boots and told bawdy jokes; a negotiator who delivers tough messages cloaked in personal warmth; and a freelance troubleshooter who claims to have won release for Cuban political prisoners by needling Fidel Castro, in Spanish, first about his country's baseball pitching and then ethnic solidarity.

{snip}

As president, Mr. Richardson has promised, he would engage, persuade and seek common ground with the rest of the world - not just on a policy level, but personally. Asked in the interview how he would approach, for instance, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, he did not mention a specific plan, but rather his desire to try his hand at one of the most bitter and long-running conflicts on earth.

"I know if I got in the room I would make some progress," he said. "I would be in heaven. I would be my own secretary of state . . ."


full article: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/122107O.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. And he has the skill sets and experience to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Richardson has great ideas
...to bad he will be of no consequence shortly. It'll be sad when we are reduced to just a few voices...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. It would be nice to have a president who understands the US can be a world leader
and that it is far more important than any domestic issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. Richard Simmons sez he can help the sperm whales too!

"I know if I got in the room I would make some progress"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Richardson's track record, experience, demonstrated commitment . . .
make your analogy as ridiculous as Simmons' act.

Your cynicism needs some work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Richardson is first class slob. And Wen Ho Le would agree with
that assessment.

Perhaps it is you that is an ignorant one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. He has done more good than harm. He's also honest enough
to admit he can make a mistake. He also can get hostages released, stop conflicts, negotiate agreements, and other things many candidates and presidents can't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Didn't Giuliani admit to mistakes that's no big deal. Doesn't every politician after being
embarrassed?

After a Federal judge exonerated Wen Ho We and condemned the whole witch hunt. Richardson still wouldn't let it go, and Richardson didn't admit to any mistake during Amy Goodman's interview. Amy Goodman did a documentary on this whole thing the other day on Democracy Now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Giuliani hasn't done any good.
The comparison is lacking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. That's not the fucking point, is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. What is the point?
If your point is all mistakes are unforgiveable, you don't need a bad comparative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Touché . . .
Edited on Sat Dec-22-07 10:20 AM by 0007

No mistake here, 'eh?

KISSINGER, McLARTY & RICHARDSON


Three Combine in Compact of Ethically Challenged

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest law firm that investigates and prosecutes public abuse and corruption, has “watched” with concern the evolution of Kissinger Associates, which now also includes as “name partners,” former Clinton-Gore White House Chief of Staff Thomas F. “Mack” McLarty and former Clinton-Gore United Nations Ambassador and Energy Secretary Bill Richardson. This “threesome” represents the lowest of ethical standards, even by modern American norms. For example, Henry Kissinger not only consorted with Richard Nixon over break-in’s of public interest and other groups, he tapped the telephone lines of fellow White House associates. Mack McLarty was in charge of The White House during Filegate and Travelgate, and lied to Judicial Watch during his deposition – feigning memory loss. Bill Richardson tried to bribe Monica Lewinsky with a U.N. job to keep her quiet about her relationship with President Bill Clinton, and then presided over an attempted coverup of the Los Alamos nuclear scandal, among other matters. “The firm of Kissinger, McLarty & Richardson epitomizes Washington, D.C. at its worst – sleazy ex-administration officials, feeding off special influence and power and then pretending, with the help of their enablers, to be fine, upstanding and respected gentlemen. Judicial Watch will ‘watch’ closely their activities and take action whenever warranted. Today, we will be filing Freedom of Information Act requests to learn about their activities in the recent past,” stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman.


http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive/2001/976.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. well
Edited on Fri Dec-21-07 12:00 PM by bigtree
I remember how I despised the polish and shine that Reagan used to mask his ugly intentions. Richardson's a bit rough on the edges, but he actually resembles most folks I see or have known in my lifetime.

The Lee case is going to come to a head soon with the civil lawsuit pending, perhaps, forcing Richardson to testify. And there's his supposed admission of 'errors' in the handling of Lee, although Lee has his own problems with credibility and complicity in the actions taken against him by the Energy Dept. and the Clinton Justice Dept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. The Wen Ho Lee witch hunt originated with a suit at Los Alamos
who was trying to cover his incompetent ass. Richardson didn't micromanage it. He should have stopped it, but didn't. That was a big mistake.

His first two years as Governor weren't good ones, since he was still playing by the DLC playbook. He seems to have had a major reality check and change of heart, and his last few years have been stellar. I had no trouble marking the ballot to re elect him.

If you're looking for perfection in a candidate, I wish you all the luck in the world because you're certainly going to need it.

However, Richardson is a tough, capable and intelligent man who gets things done and makes even the grumpy happy about it. He's gotten commuter rail service up and running in a state that never even considered such an outlandish citified thing---and it's working. Behind that rumpled appearance is the most qualified guy running.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Richardson plays both ends against the middle. He is nothing
but a brown nosing ass kissing fake. When the Repukes were going after Bill Clinton he showed his colors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Uh, that's what you have to DO in politics to be successful
and get things done.

Good luck finding perfection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. Does that include extraditing war criminals?
Just asking the question that we need to ask all the presidential candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ceile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
9. The most experience and capability to get things done.
Yet, he is a distant fourth. Sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. i expect this of the nominee, regardless of who it may be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC