Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here's what Russ Feingold says about the DLC in his book

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 01:31 AM
Original message
Here's what Russ Feingold says about the DLC in his book
Here's what Russ Feingold says about the DLC in his book ---
pg 163 ---

Feingold begins with comments after NAFTA and the split that caused in the Democratic party
reflecting "not merely differences about trade issues per se, but it also symbolized a fundamental difference over the direction of the Democratic Party.'

"He was angered by the growing influence of corporate campaign contributions in his party --- and those condtributions, he believed, were a big factorbehind the Clinton administration's support of NAFTA. For him and other progressives and liberal Democrats, the influence of big money was a dispiriting trend that had started in the aftermath of Demcoratic election defeats in the early 1980s, when moderate and conservative Democrats
launched the pro-business DLC. The corporate-backed DLC's motto might have been, 'If you can't beat 'em, join 'em.'"

"By 1993, the DLC, in collaboration with the Clinton Administration, was a leadhing player in a massive public relations campaign to sell NAFTA in Congress. Feingold said: 'I see the DLC as, to some extent, taking the soul away from the Democratic Party. And, I see the DLC as having sold American workers down the river.' Feingold believed NAFTA was not good for the country, and especially not good for small businesses and millions of blue-and-white collar-workers that progressive Democrats should be fighting for. The loss of manufacturing jobs in particular has devastated a number of cities and states."

This is from "Feingold-A New Democratic Party" by Sanford D. Horwitt
Simon & Schuster - 2007

***************************************



D&P:

Of course, NAFTA is not a success except for those who want a "third world America."

These agreements, without protections for workers, simply exist to harvest slave labor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks - this helps me understand the DLC a little better. Are you reading his
book?

Recommend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'm scanning it --- and will read what seems important ---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Recommended
taking the soul away from the Democratic Party

Time to take it back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. That line said it all. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R.
You can try to defend the DLC, but they are ultimately not Democrats in any meaningful, practical way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2hip Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'd love to see an Edwards-Feingold ticket
That would be a kick-ass team of two guys who "get it".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Not a bad idea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. That's what I've been hoping for...
... if Russ can't replace Reid as Senate Majority Leader soon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. It is already reducing our country to slave labor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
9. Thank you for posting this D&P. I have bookmarked these wise words. rec'd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kicking This Up
Needs more viewing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. I hope Feingold decides to run for President soon
That would break another barrier: liberal Jew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Though I stick by my statement that Senators don't win elections
I'd vote for Russ without hesitation and hope that he proved history wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. I believe it too
The Democratic Party has lost its soul, the fact that they have not impeached the President and the Vice-President is proof
of it. The GOP impeached Clinton over perjury, how can the stealing of 2 elections, an illegal war be seen as a lesser
offense than perjury?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
17. thank goodness for Russ. and I sure miss Paul
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC