Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"25 Senators Promise to Block Changes to Media Ownership Rules"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:38 PM
Original message
"25 Senators Promise to Block Changes to Media Ownership Rules"
December 17, 2007
25 Senators Promise to Block Changes to Media Ownership Rules

By Ira Teinowitz

A bipartisan group of 25 senators has issued a new warning to FCC Chairman Kevin J. Martin as the maneuvering intensifies in advance of Tuesday’s scheduled media ownership vote: Unless he pulls back, they will quickly take steps to overturn any rules change.

In a letter Monday, senators led by Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., suggest Mr. Martin, in a “determined push to relax media ownership rules,” is giving short shrift to getting public comment on proposed changes and to studying the impact loss of local ownership could have.

The new letter may be the harshest yet to Mr. Martin, who is seeing his push for ownership changes color his relationship with Congress. Mr. Martin has proposed the FCC replace its current ban on newspapers and broadcasters buying each other in a market with a rule that generally allows such purchases in the top 20 markets and may allow them in smaller markets.

In the latest letter, the senators compare the amount of time the FCC is giving for public comment on the media-ownership proposal changes with the amount of time the agency gave to proposed new procedures for cell phone towers.

“When you proposed a new rule on the effects of communication towers on migratory birds, you allowed for a 90-day comment period,” said the letter. It said it was unreasonable to allow less than 30 days for the public comment on a rule with far greater potential impact.

“We believe denies the American public any real ability for input and fails to reflect reasoned and transparent agency decision-making. We believe you have shortchanged the comment process and you have not completed a full review of localism,” the letter said.

“We are writing to notify you that if you proceed to take final action on Dec. 18, we will immediately move legislation that will revoke and nullify the proposed rule. We are notifying you and others in order to make certain you understand the consequences of ignoring the need for and the right of the American people to play a constructive role in attempts by a federal agency to change rules that have a substantial impact on the American people.”


In addition to Mr. Dorgan, the letter’s signers include the chairman and ranking member of the Senate Commerce Committee.

In the House, Rep. Ed Markey, D-Mass., chairman of the House Energy & Commerce Committee’s telecom committee, released information from the Government Accountability Office highlighting the lack of female- and minority-owned broadcast outlets in all markets. He also questioned going ahead with the vote on ownership.

“It is past time for the FCC to address our nation’s abysmal record on female- and minority-owned broadcast media,” Rep. Markey said. “The FCC should work diligently to address this important public policy matter soon.

“If the FCC proceeds with a vote tomorrow on media-ownership issues, I urge all the commissioners to weigh carefully the impact of any new rules or waiver standards on the historic policy values of diversity and localism,” he added.

An FCC spokeswoman declined comment.

http://www.tvweek.com/news/2007/12/25_senators_promise_to_block_c.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rec'd! This is progress, and very important for us all! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. This is HUGE!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kick! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R -- Thanks!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. RIGHT. ON.
Well done, Senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. Right on...now we just need 75 more!!
:thumbsup: :thumbsup:

:kick: & Recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kick
:banghead:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. Not to be the asshole here but
Edited on Tue Dec-18-07 02:11 PM by walldude
I have a wooden nickel which is about what their promises are worth these days...

well that didn't take long.. Now how long do I need to wait till the promise is broken?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2491688
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC