Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Clinton campaign organized a three-week blitz to court the Des Moines Register editorial board

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 10:33 AM
Original message
WP: Clinton campaign organized a three-week blitz to court the Des Moines Register editorial board

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2007/12/the_register_endorsement_how_c_1.html?nav=rss_blog

<snip>

The editor's of Iowa's most influential newspaper closely guarded their pick, leaving people like The Fix to engage in rampant speculation about which Democrat and Republican would get the nod. In the moments leading up to the announcement, conventional wisdom seemed to have settled on Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.). But the truth was that no one really knew.

So, how did Clinton win the Register's editorial board over? And what does it mean for her and her main opponents in the final 18 days before the Iowa caucuses?

Let's answer those questions one by one.

Knowing their backs were against the wall in Iowa (as an endorsement by the Register of Obama might well have sealed the deal for the Illinois senator in the Hawkeye State), the Clinton campaign organized a three-week blitz to court the editorial board.

Clinton and her husband met with the board over cocktails to make the case. A series of surrogates -- including former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, retired Gen. Wesley Clark, EMILY's List chief Ellen Malcolm and Robert Kennedy Jr. -- barraged the board with calls in support of Clinton. High-level Clinton staffers -- including campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle, pollster Mark Penn, policy director Neera Tanden and senior adviser Ann Lewis -- met individually with members of the board to make the case.

The central argument was that Clinton -- and Clinton alone -- had the experience, both in and out of public office, to not only be elected president but also do the job from day one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's one good thing about Hillary
Edited on Mon Dec-17-07 10:37 AM by Onlooker
Her team is smart. They have the best experience for running a campaign. (That doesn't mean they have the best candidate, though.)

Thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. Are you implying this is a bad thing?
I'm sure more of the candidates did this. So what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Nope. Like the article mentions many believed the board was leaning Obama. This gives
a little more background...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think what the OP is implying
is that if she hadn't done this, she wouldn't have gotten the endorsement. That she can't win based on merit alone, but rather money and influence. That's how I read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's been reported that BOTH Obama and Clinton actively courted the Register.
Edited on Mon Dec-17-07 10:54 AM by wlucinda
and they met with most of the other candidates as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. Gee we see it worked.
Guess Obama is not the uniter he pretends to be. He can't get the confidence of a newspaper where he is supposed to have the votes sewed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. And Edwards or Obama will win Iowa.
Newspapers aren't worth the toilet paper they're printed on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think they used to have more influence.
But those days are fading. It probably still matters to some older voters, the ones who still read a newspaper everyday. But for the most part, it's becoming more irrelevant for the public. Fewer people reading, more sources of info, etc. It was already irrelevant for me decades ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. DMR owned by Gannett since 1985.
Which also owns:

Air Force Times, Springfield, Virginia
Armed Forces Journal, McLean, Virginia
Army Times, Springfield, Virginia
Defense News, Springfield, Virginia
Federal Times, Springfield, Virginia
Marine Corps Times, Springfield, Virginia
Military City, Springfield, Virginia
Navy Times, Springfield, Virginia
Gannett Healthcare Group, Falls Church, Virginia

KGAN TV, Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Utterly unwatchable. One reason (from 2004): "The Point" is a one-minute commentary hosted by Mark Hyman, the Sinclair (Broadcasting) vice president for corporate relations. In recent weeks, the spot has said presidential candidate John Kerry falsified documents concerning his military service and supported "communist forces opposed to the U.S. in Vietnam" by speaking out against the war.

Far right wing drivel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. "Met over cocktails..."
Looks like K-Street's influence extends a lot further than just Georgetown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC