Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hidden U.S. Deaths Of Gulf Wars: Since Gulf War 1 - 73,846 US Dead, 1,620,906 Disabled

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 09:19 PM
Original message
Hidden U.S. Deaths Of Gulf Wars: Since Gulf War 1 - 73,846 US Dead, 1,620,906 Disabled
Hidden U.S. Deaths Of Gulf Wars

Since Gulf War 1 - 73,846 US Dead, 1,620,906 Disabled

By Peter Marshall E. Boomhower


12/13/07 "ICH" -- -- The US department of veteran affairs has issued an official report (See report in full) that confirms 73,000 U.S. troops killed and 1.6 million "disabled" by Persian Gulf wars. 73,846 U.S. Troops Dead (Page 6) and 1,620,906 permanently disabled ( Page 7)

George Walker Bush has presided over the worst defeat of the United States Military since Vietnam and has deliberately skewed reporting of the deaths and injuries to conceal the facts.

The Department of Veteran's Affairs, in conjunction with the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has released the truth because they need the American People to know our military is literally, destroyed.

They cannot release these horrific numbers via the chain of command because they are under orders to conceal the truth at all costs, so they let slip a report which now cannot be "un-slipped."

Here are the facts and a link to the government source to prove these facts:

More Gulf War Veterans Have Died Than Vietnam Veterans.

more...

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18878.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. And all the PTSD cases who will fall into alcoholism and madness.....
Well, I guess we know where our next 40-50 years' worth of HOMELESS PEOPLE are coming from.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cgrindley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. 73k dead US soldiers from Gulf 1 and Gulf 3? Bullshit
that source you cite is probably the loopiest, dumbest, and most oblivious to the most undemanding facets of logic I've ever seen. I wouldn't quote it in a bar fight. The article is statistically illiterate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Take it up with the US Dept. of Veteran Affairs-they issued
the official report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cgrindley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Oh dear
1.6 million disability claims does NOT equal 1.6 million disabled vets, you know.... right?

and 73,000 deaths of people who served in the army (not deployed means, by the way, that they weren't deployed) during the late 1980s and early 1990s just means that out of the millions and millions of people who served in the active duty forces, 73,000 of them have died over the last 26 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. depleted uranium takes its toll then and now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Did you even bother to click on the link:? The numbers are broken down
in the article, so you're not telling me anything new. Not that you care, you just attack. I'm impressed...not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I clicked on the link, and if you can't understand that you're
Edited on Thu Dec-13-07 09:37 PM by cali
being manipulated big time by the author of that piece, well, I'm sorry. His claims are largely bogus. Beginning with the initial one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crabby Appleton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. You are quite correct cali nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. don't even bother
there are too many people driven by their preconceived notions. And it's pretty clear that many here are more or less illiterate when it comes to parsing figures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. There you are, ms. critical cali. I knew you'd pop up to let us know
how dumb we all are. You're right on time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. don't sound so bitter, bs
and try actually downloading and reading the pdf the author links to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. I don't know if you have a valid point or not,
all I'm picking up on is an arrogant and nasty tone. Yuck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. that's not even remotely what the Dept of Veteran Affairs is
saying. Not even close.

The author of the piece you posted is lying. It's as simple as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. oh my word. this says it all regarding the
accuracy of this interpretation of the data:

"Deaths amongst Non-Deployed: 55,999"

Do you understand that these folks were never deployed to the theater?

Informationclearinghouse is about as accurate as worldnutdaily.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. Shocking, sad, and thoroughly believable. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC