Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush ‘privately’ issues second SCHIP veto

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 06:44 PM
Original message
Bush ‘privately’ issues second SCHIP veto
Now he's hiding his assholeness?

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/12/bush-privately-issues-second-schip-veto/

Bush ‘privately’ issues second SCHIP veto.

AP reports that President Bush vetoed SCHIP legislation today, marking the seventh veto of his presidency and his second on SCHIP:

Bush vetoed the bill in private.

In a statement notifying Congress of his decision, Bush said the bill was unacceptable because — like the first one — it allows adults into the program, would cover people in families with incomes above the U.S. median and raises taxes. {…}

Bush urged Congress to extend the program at its current funding level before lawmakers leave Washington for their holiday break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Colour me surprised
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Joe Barton...
:rofl: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Maybe I should have said, "colour him yellow?"
:D :hi: :hug:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zabet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Junior's favorite hobby!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Send it back Dems
then call a Press COnference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Dirty rotten low-life sack of shit.
Plenty of money for Blackwater and Halliburton but none for American children.

Bush: "Those kids need to pull themselves up by their bootstraps like I did when Daddy bought me my first oil company."

May he rot in hell for his crimes against the American People.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yeah fuck all those adults with pre-existing conditions!
Why should sick people have health care anyway. They are a drain on the taxpayer. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. he's such a stupid hackneyed piece of corporate owned shit
Edited on Wed Dec-12-07 07:13 PM by spanone
fifth rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. Tie it to a tax decrease for the middle class and resubmit it.
Edited on Wed Dec-12-07 07:12 PM by Marr
Hey- he's for lower taxes, right? Not just lower taxes for his own rich pals. So that should be a win/win. Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why does he hate the children in the U.S.A.? Why?
Yup! You're right. He IS an asshole,...a money-grubbing, corporate-serving asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dapper Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. But we got $70b for the wars...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3100073

Tell me this really isn't happening. Veto anything that helps an American but pour our money into non-sense wars!

This shit is crazy.

Dap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. Gosh, where's the photo op?
Wouldn't he want a photo op for this? After all, he's proud of it, right?

I'm just furious. As usual, the Democrats are played again, and poor kids are the ones who'll suffer as a result.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. Didn't congress override his veto?
Or am I remembering wrong? How can he veto it if congress overrode his veto?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. Setting the Record Straight... (what an uncaring unfeeling egotistical jerk)
http://www.whitehouse.gov.edgesuite.net/news/releases/2007/11/20071102-2.html
Setting the Record Straight: Democrats' SCHIP Bill Repackages Bad Policy
Senate Wastes Time With Partisan Political Statements Instead Of Passing A Bill To Cover Poor Kids First

"The Senate passed another SCHIP bill with major flaws, especially its failure to cover poor children first. Congress has known for weeks that the President would veto this bill. … Like the previous bill, this bill also shifts children with private insurance onto the government rolls, uses taxpayers' dollars to subsidize middle class families, and raises taxes. It does all this while costing even more over the next five years than the version the President previously vetoed."
- White House Press Secretary Dana Perino, 11/1/07

Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) says the White House seems to be "'moving the goal posts,' raising new objections as soon as Congress tried to address each of the president's concerns." (Robert Pear, "Expecting Presidential Veto, Senate Passes Child Health Measure," The New York Times, 11/2/07)

Democrats' SCHIP Bill Contains The Same Flaws As The Vetoed Legislation

Congressional Democrats refused to meet with Administration officials designated by the President to negotiate on an SCHIP bill that serves poor kids first. Instead, the House of Representatives made a few adjustments at the margins of the vetoed bill and passed it again.

Like the bill the President vetoed, the bill passed last night by the Senate:

* Allows States to avoid covering poor children first. The bill repeals the requirement that 95 percent of children below 200 percent of the Federal poverty level be covered before coverage is extended to new children from higher income families. The Democrats' new legislation also permits States to keep adults on the program through 2012.

* Raises taxes to move 2 million children covered by private health insurance onto government-run programs with fewer choices and longer lines. Federal revenues are at an all-time high, and no tax increase of any kind is needed to finance SCHIP reauthorization. The President's Budget offsets not only his proposed new SCHIP spending but also proposes an additional $92 billion in mandatory savings over five years.

* Uses taxpayers' dollars to subsidize middle class families. The Democrats' new legislation continues to cover children in families earning more than $62,000 per year (300 percent of the Federal poverty level). In addition, the legislation would not completely close the income disregard loophole, under which States could enroll children in families with income higher than $62,000 a year (for a family of four) by ignoring part of the family's income or expenses. The legislation fails to close the loophole for States expanding through Medicaid.

* Allows SCHIP to cover ineligible individuals. The legislation imposes no sanction if a person fraudulently attests to being a U.S. citizen. The bill contains an "express lane" enrollment provision that makes it easy for ineligible people to be enrolled in SCHIP, with virtually no penalty to States for letting ineligible people enroll. In fact, States may be rewarded through the Performance Bonus for adding ineligible people to the rolls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 04:40 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Had they given him what he SAID he wanted...
there would have been further lame excuses about why he had to veto the bill yet again. You can not negotiate with the decider when he's already decided his decision in derision of your position.

Once Congress catches on, there may be some progress, even (please God), Impeachment. But I'm not holding my breath. It's a whole different world inside the beltway and your representatives are on an entirely different plane of existence here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. Quietly kills a few thousand people with one stroke of the pen.
What's a few thousand more for the psycho-moron-frat-boy pretender?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC