|
I turned on C-Span's Washington Journal this morning after it began. As the TV came on a young fellow who Gretta was interviewing was just finishing up a sentence which ended with him saying that portions of the bill were classified and portions were not. They then went on to discuss facilities in which classified matters were discussed, but that was a separate matter.
How on earth can you have a bill (law) that is completely or partially classified? I don't think it is possible. First; it seems implausible that a person could be held to account for doing something that it would have been illegal for them to find out was illegal, and second; that it is the executive agencies that have the power to classify and so it is not within the purview of Congress to produce a classified document - ain't their job so they can't do it.
Imagine that to run a red light was an illegal activity but that it was a state secrete that you could not run a red light. Not only that but it was against the law for you to attempt to learn that there was a law against running red lights. In fact you could be jailed for having a copy of the law that said it was illegal to run red lights. Still, you could be arrested for running red lights.
So what's going on here? Are we now passing laws in secrete?
|