Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congress Screams “Kiddie Porn,” Tries To Kill Public WiFi

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 10:29 PM
Original message
Congress Screams “Kiddie Porn,” Tries To Kill Public WiFi
Edited on Tue Dec-11-07 10:29 PM by ProSense

Congress Screams “Kiddie Porn,” Tries To Kill Public WiFi

By: Jane Hamsher Tuesday December 11, 2007 12:19 pm

Lack of universal access to the internet is a big problem, and it's only going to get worse with this:

The U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday overwhelmingly approved a bill saying that anyone offering an open Wi-Fi connection to the public must report illegal images including "obscene" cartoons and drawings--or face fines of up to $300,000.

That broad definition would cover individuals, coffee shops, libraries, hotels, and even some government agencies that provide Wi-Fi. It also sweeps in social-networking sites, domain name registrars, Internet service providers, and e-mail service providers such as Hotmail and Gmail, and it may require that the complete contents of the user's account be retained for subsequent police inspection.


It's the Patriot Act of wireless porn, forcing Starbucks clerks to turn into snitches and join Joe Lieberman and Hillary Clinton in wagging their nagging finger in the latest high-tech chapter of the culture wars, to the detriment of public WiFi:

The SAFE Act represents the latest in Congress' efforts--some of which have raised free speech and privacy concerns--to crack down on sex offenders and Internet predators. One bill introduced a year ago was even broader and would have forced Web sites and blogs to report illegal images. Another would require sex offenders to supply e-mail addresses and instant messaging user names.

Wednesday's vote caught Internet companies by surprise: the Democratic leadership rushed the SAFE Act to the floor under a procedure that's supposed to be reserved for noncontroversial legislation. It was introduced October 10, but has never received even one hearing or committee vote. In addition, the legislation approved this week has changed substantially since the earlier version and was not available for public review.

Not one Democrat opposed the SAFE Act. Two Republicans did: Rep. Ron Paul, the libertarian-leaning presidential candidate from Texas, and Rep. Paul Broun from Georgia.


Roll Call
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Freedom on the march
soon we'll all be in concentration camps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. sorry, i really overspoke
Edited on Tue Dec-11-07 10:48 PM by BleedingHeartPatriot
while underthinking :blush: MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The House passed the bill
the Senate had not one whit to do with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varkam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Between this and voting on the importance of Christianity...
I think I can say that I'm fast becoming jaded with our congress critters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sometimes, I really do understand when honest & principled conservatives lament big government
"require this...mandate that...must do this...shall fulfill the following...or face a fine and penalty of X"

Unfortunately, most so-called small government conservatives today only want small government for corporations, but are quite comfortable with big government for everybody else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC