Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did anyone else hear Larry Johnson say the CIA tapes weren't destroyed?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 03:19 PM
Original message
Did anyone else hear Larry Johnson say the CIA tapes weren't destroyed?
On the Stephanie Miller Show today, ex-CIA spy Larry Johnson said that he didn't believe the tapes, at least not all of the tapes, had been destroyed. He mentioned that someone(in Congress?) had viewed them as recently as the fall of 2006.

Did anyone catch that or know what he is talking about?

If there are copies left, I am sure many people are all the more interested in finding what on them is so threatening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. finding what on them is so threatening.
Edited on Mon Dec-10-07 03:27 PM by seemslikeadream
WHAT THE CIA DOESN'T WANT YOU TO KNOW ABOUT ABU ZUBAYDAH

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2439700









DEAD BECAUSE OF A LIE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here's a link to his blog:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thanks! That is what I was looking for.
It seems the tapes were very much un-destroyed in September 2007!!

This story stinks something rotten.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Prosecutor in Trial of 9/11 Conspirator Moussaoui Informs Judges That He Viewed Two Videos 2mos ago
Edited on Mon Dec-10-07 03:32 PM by seemslikeadream
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sounds like a bait and switch to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. What NIE report?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Somethings don't add up.
Under sharp questioning from Judge Brinkema, the Justice Department had denied that any videotapes of the interrogations existed. But Rosenberg wrote that the CIA, without the Justice Department's knowledge, "possessed the three recordings" at the time the department made its declaration.

The government's declaration, made on November 14, 2005, came amid a dispute between Judge Brinkema and the government over Moussaoui's requests for access to confidential documents and the right to call captive al-Qaida members as witnesses. The government refused, citing national security.

Judge Brinkema "ordered the government to disclose various information. . .including whether interrogations were recorded," Rosenberg wrote. The judge later reconsidered most of his order, at the government's request, "but still directed the government to confirm or deny that it has video or audio tapes of these interrorgations."

The government responded with a declaration by a CIA executive that "The U.S. Government does not have any video or audio tapes of the interrogations," Rosenberg's letter continued.


link: http://www.opednews.com/articles/3/genera_skeeter__071209_the__skeeter_bites_r.htm

The Justice Department has always denied the tapes exist. The CIA allowed the judge in the Moussaoui case to view them in Sept. 2007, but now claim that they were destoyed in 2005.

No mention of the audio, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. So the Judge is a witness to the existence of the tape(s) and what was/is on it/them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. And the prosecutor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC