Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Punctuation lesson: It is not same-sex "marriage." It is same-sex marriage. Or just marriage.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 01:52 PM
Original message
Punctuation lesson: It is not same-sex "marriage." It is same-sex marriage. Or just marriage.
Unless someone would like to explain to me why it is necessary on DU to use the scare quotes, which I have seen here today (and before).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree about the punctuation. But if it's same-anything, it should be...
...same-gender marriage. Don't think of an elephant.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Lakoff annoys me.
I don't think "same gender" works either, anyway... A female-identified biological male and a female-identified biological female have always been able to get married. So long as the genitalia looks right, gender is irrelevant.

If anything, sex is more binary than gender.

(I've used gender-blind marriage before, which I think may be closer.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. I prefer the phrase "marriage for everyone"
It sounds more democratic dontcha think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I just call it Equal Marriage Rights as much as possible :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. How about "same-genital marriage"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Separate but equal is not equal. I know, I grew up with Separate
but equal. Being white, male and straight I'm just lucky enough to be born on the right side of equal and I recognize it as nothing more than dumb luck.

It isn't about special rights, it's about human rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think we need to seperate a government based civil union from
a religion based marriage. Sorry if I offended by putting marriage into quotes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. That has ALWAYS been the case
The fact that civil law and religious ceremony both use the word marriage is irrelevant.

The only legal act that an officiant does is take the jurat of the couple being married and countersigns the signatures of the principles and two witnesses to the jurat. This is a notarial act, and the states of Maine, South Carolina and Florida already allow notaries public to officiate at weddings. I say, remove clergy from the list of legal officiants and add notaries. End of confusion without having to rewrite centuries of statutes and case law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. That's cool--I've seen it before, though, too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC