Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is there anything outrageous enough that would cross the line?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeeDeeNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 12:27 PM
Original message
Is there anything outrageous enough that would cross the line?
There must be something that would finally cause Pelosi and the others to immediately put impeachment back on the table.
I would like to know what that could be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nothing. It's off the table. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, if treason (Plame) isn't doing it, I don't know what could. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. I've posted so many threads like yours and every time I have I have
felt like exploding. Short of the people storming the Hill with pitchforks and tar and feathers, I'm despairing of justice ever being served on this administration. I, however, am vowing to vote against any candidate my area who does not support Kuicinich's bill. I don't care which side of the aisle they are on. Incumbents don't deserve their offices if they let the biggest mass of corruption and crime in our nation's history, the subversion of the Constitution, and outright treason go unpunished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. No, because impeachment proceedings might hurt Democratic electability
I feel that the current leadership is willing to let the country go to hell as long as it will help them gain more power in 2008.

Once they grab the reins of power, they'll of course need a bit more to get anything done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. This article . . .
Edited on Mon Dec-10-07 12:37 PM by Richard D
. . . gives a pretty compelling explanation as to why it's "off the table".

Pelosi and Torture
by John Nichols

That House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has been a disappointing leader for House Democrats, few serious observers of the congressional condition will deny. But, now, she appears to be something more troubling: a serious hindrance to the fight against the use of crudest and most objectionable torture techniques.

Democrats and Republicans with a conscience have gotten a good deal of traction in recent months in their battle to identify the use by U.S. interrogators of waterboarding - a technique that simulates drowning in order to cause extreme mental distress to prisoners — as what it is: torture. Arizona Senator John McCain, a GOP presidential contender, has been particularly powerful in his denunciations of this barbarous endeavor. And Senate Intelligence Committee chair Jay Rockefeller, D-West Virginia, and key members of the Senate Judiciary Committee have effectively pressed the issue on a number of fronts.

Now, however, comes the news that Pelosi knew as early as 2002 that the U.S. was using waterboarding and other torture techniques and, far from objecting, appears to have cheered the tactics on.

The Washington Post reports that Pelosi, who was then a senior member of the House Intelligence Committee, was were informed by CIA officials at a secret briefing in September 2002, that waterboarding and other forms of torture were being used on suspected al-Queda operatives. That’s bad. Even worse is the revelation that Pelosi was apparently supportive of the initiative.

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/12/10/5738/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. I Monica Lewinsky had oral sex with Bush
it wouldn't even cause a ripple on either side of the aisle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeeDeeNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Sad but true nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Clearly not. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC