Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Aaargh. . "Your" vs You're" on Today. .

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 09:09 AM
Original message
Aaargh. . "Your" vs You're" on Today. .
Dumb dumb dumb.. Apparently even on the NBC Network.. no one knows the difference..
(did anyone get a screen shot?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. and these people call themselves "professional" journalists and editors
Yeah. Right. Whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. If they keep that up--
--they will loose ratings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah, there really dumb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. They obviously went
to school in China. I opened a package of summer sausage the other day and the opening said "Peal here." I looked everywhere for a bell to ring and couldn't find one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. Burning grammar issues we should have learned in elementary school.
Anything but the NIE and torture.


:eyes:

MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rAVES Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. yea I totally hate that..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anniebelle Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. I've got a collection of these I send to MSNBC every week.
Dan Abrams has a spot on his nightly show (right after Keith) in which he highlights screw ups by the media, called Beat the Press. He'll take your spots if you give him the show and what time it was on. He gets some great ones. I've noticed in the last few years that Americans must not be taught grammar, spelling, etc. in our school system. Oh, I mean English (Lou Dobbs), not a foreign language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
8. I see my pet peeve -- "alot."
There is no such word, but I see it a lot.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. I see it a lot too... and "anyways"...
and noone (no one).

And on TV news, no one knows how to pronounce words properly.

Get a clue, talking heads, the "t" in "often" is silent! And there are two L's in "regularly"!

Now, some will come back and tell me that the exclamation point in the sentence above should have gone before the closing quote. This one always sticks in my craw... I was taught grammar in a very British, very Olde English fashion. It's still acceptable in GB to put the closing punctuation outside the closing quotation mark if the quotation marks are setting words apart, and not part of actual speech. There are those who would argue the closing punctuation should always go outside the closing quotation mark. And that a comma should always precede the word "and".

I keep The Gregg Reference Manual at my desk for all of these sticky wickets!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. For those not clear on the distinction ....
You're is a contraction. When you start to use it simply say "You are" instead of "You're" and see if it works. Here's an example of a place where it doesn't work:

You might say to someone "Is that you're hammer?" but it would be wrong. Substitute and say it to yourself; "Is that you are hammer?" doesn't make much sense, does it? By contrast if you said "You're going to hit your thumb with that hammer." not only would it be a nice thing to say to someone who was about to hurt them self and its perfectly correct too. Once again, just substitute; "You are going to hit your thumb with that hammer" works just fine grammatically. See?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
10. What happened to our school system
I just can not understand what they teach in schools today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
11. There grammar is atrocious
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Your bad....
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
12. Another one:
People have been ingrained to use 'I' instead of 'me' when a sentence has two nouns. Even when 'me' is the correct word to use, people will still use 'I.' The key is to always take the other person out of the sentence to determine if you would use 'me' or 'I.'

Jane & I are going to the store. --correct

Is there cake for Jane & I? --incorrect -- If you take Jane out of the sentence, you would ask, "Is there cake for me?" not "Is there cake for I?"


I read an interesting article several years ago about how our low standards in language skills is adversely affecting our innovation.
A person's ideas are limited when they lack the words to express ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Decades back H.L. Mencken wrote a book called
"The American Language". It dispels the idea that the "between you and I" deviation from standard American English is a recent thing. It's actually quite consistent, and belongs to a different dialect (or maybe a different register) of American English from the standard language usually assumed to bear prestige in the US media.

It's sort of an important point, because a lot of people assume that it's hypercorrection or a recent innovation, or random. A bit was theory-driven, since accounting for "between you and I" in a Chomskian framework was, well, pretty much impossible; maybe it's possible now that we've dismissed as imbecilic the frameworks from the '60s and '70s and '80s, and now have the fourth or fifth variety of the One True Framework.

In any event, Mencken's work almost certainly needs to be updated (or, as the mixed dialect I seem to have would have it, "Mencken's work needs updated"), but it's not still not bad for being 80 years old.

BTW, it's tough to be grammar police when you don't obey the law: " ... about how our low standards in language skills is adversely affecting our innovation." While last bit would be more felicitious with, "ability to innovate", let's stick to the obvious: "Our low standards is affecting our innovation"? They is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
14. Without fail, I see grammatical errors on a daily basis...
In print news, television news, and in published books.

As much as I hate to see the grammar and spelling police condescending and lording over others here on DU, I hate with an even more fiery passion the errors I see in what is supposed to be professional writing.

It all goes back to education, and the lack thereof, here in the good ol' USA. We can't even produce good spellers, how in the hell are we supposed to produce good scientists and leaders?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
16. Leave no idiot behind much?? Them Master GOPers want a dumb and dumber Nation
They thrive while we strive...

To Fool is to RULE.....

Its easier to Fool if we DROOL.....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Yep... we are heading toward (not towards)
An "Idiocracy".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. Heading, Toward, Pointing, etc ??? WE ARE HERE ALREADY..Idiocracy is REAL
Edited on Mon Dec-10-07 02:26 PM by opihimoimoi
Take a test:

Ask anyone: What is 7 x 9 ???? SEVEN Multiplied by NINE....and then come back...

In General, you should find about 40% will give you an accurate answer...

If WE cannot Compute...? Then what are we?...

Collectively, our Dolt Level is too fucking HIGH....

Spelling is One thing, Grammer is Another....but MATH???

Oh My God??? What Have we ALLOWED???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. What Have we ALLOWED???
In a nutshell? Self-regulation... across the board in our lives. No oversight anywhere.

My grandfather was an eighth grade graduate, and I swear he knew more on every subject than the college grads I have been interviewing lately. You should see the snide look when I ask someone with a degree in English or writing to take my writing test. Incredulous! The misplaced self-righteous disdain is its own irony. I generally go over every mistake with them, so they know why they weren't hired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Yup, Duffussness has gone Ebolaesque...them Pubs made it airborne
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. For some reason, I've also noticed that a lot more people..
are using "'s" to pluralize words.



Along of course with 'lose' and 'loose'. How the hell do people get those two mixed up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I see lose and loose mixed up all the time.
It makes me want to loose my mind. Only kidding!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
21. The award must go to "it's" versus "its"
On Sunday I opened the paper to see a nice, full-page, full-color advertisement for Great Wolf Lodge displaying an apostrophe to make "its" possessive. It was set in big 48 point type. You couldn't miss it.

It drives me nuts. Apostrophes are dropped willy-nilly into all kinds of words, but I see them most often in "its."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogmarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
22. Charles' book or Charles's book?

Which is correct? I'd say Charles's book.

In Jesus' name. Correct or incorrect?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dervill Crow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. It depends entirely upon the pronunciation.
If you pronounce the 's at the end as a separate syllable, you add the 's.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
24. And the students of today are the copy editors of tomorrow...
Since we know that schools distribute the appropriate tools for a student's education, it would seem that more and more students are "too cool" to use these tools to their best interests. And the students of today are the copy editors of tomorrow...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
26. They're all wingers. What do you expect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
27. YOUR crazy if you think YOU'RE post will make a difference
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
28. Shit, I make that mistake all the freakin time.
Your all just being nit picky :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
31. You're on your own. I can't be bothered today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dulcinea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
32. What happened to subject-verb agreement?
I get notes from my daughter's preschool all the time that say things like "Timmy pull Jimmy's name in the drawing." It makes me want to scream. When did this become acceptable?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC