|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 05:18 PM Original message |
FAIREST TAX SOLUTION - elimate all income tax, only tax corporations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mslawstudent (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
1. I disagree entirely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 05:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
22. I disagree.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 06:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
24. But this plan would give people more capital to invest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 06:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
26. But what Dem couldn't win with this platform? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
2. Jeez, are the unintended consequences of such a move that hard to envision? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KitchenWitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
3. I do not have an educated opinion on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
4. If they returned the corporate income tax rate to what it was in the 1970s |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cyrano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
5. Your second point is THE point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 05:28 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. My question is...don't they already pass all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cyrano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 05:30 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Nothing would be new. It would just be the same old crap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 05:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Business don't always pass expense increases to consumers just like they don't pass expense decrease |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cyrano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 05:47 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. I'm not talking about items like Chia Pets. I'm talking about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 05:40 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. Then let those who CONSUME pay the taxes. Those of us who are trying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redstone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 05:53 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. That works for me, too. Except I'd like to keep an exemption for those items that are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
8. I think we should only tax twenty families for the next 8 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redstone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
10. Oh, yeah, sure. Then you'll only have to pay twenty times as much for anything you buy that's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
11. Wouldn't this just result in a horribly regressive tax? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 06:22 PM Response to Reply #11 |
27. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
12. Here's why this cannot work.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 05:49 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Then consumers would have an extra 1 trillion to buy items the corporations are selling! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
14. bermuda and the caymans would LOVE that- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 05:55 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. I believe that should be made illegal for any corporation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 06:11 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. a lot of things should be made illegal for corporations... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pennylane100 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
16. If corporations only paid their fair share, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elizfeelinggreat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 05:50 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. amen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Esra Star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
18. Philosophically it is more appropriate to extract tax when the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
23. To be combined with tarrifs, and taxes on those who make over 1 million/year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC