Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FAIREST TAX SOLUTION - elimate all income tax, only tax corporations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:18 PM
Original message
FAIREST TAX SOLUTION - elimate all income tax, only tax corporations
This will reduce the burden on tax collection (they will only have to look at a few hundred thousand returns), and on the people.

The right wing has been pushing for years that "you can't tax corporations" because "they pass the burdenn to the consumers", therefore the reverse must be true.

Huckabee is a proponent of the fair tax - it will shift the tax burden to the poor and middle class and ease the tax burden on the ruling elite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mslawstudent Donating Member (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. I disagree entirely
Taxes on corporations should be low for active investments and working capital. Corporations do alot of good things and do create very good paying jobs. Regulation and control can work.

Most of europe has very low corporate rates for just that reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. I disagree..
... for an entirely different reason.

Since all taxes on corps are passed on to the consumer to the extent possible, this is nothing but a back-door consumption tax.

And a pure consumption tax is regressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. But this plan would give people more capital to invest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. But what Dem couldn't win with this platform?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Jeez, are the unintended consequences of such a move that hard to envision?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. I do not have an educated opinion on this
Mind if I just hang out and learn?

:popcorn:

Are you saying we should vote for Huckabee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. If they returned the corporate income tax rate to what it was in the 1970s
it would be a big step (more than double what it is now).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cyrano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Your second point is THE point.
Edited on Fri Dec-07-07 05:27 PM by Cyrano
If only corporations are taxed, do you really believe they won't pass on those taxes to us, the consumers?

If there's one thing I've absorbed over the years, it's that the world is made up of fuckors and fuckees. And we, the middle class and the poor are the fuckees.

I hate it, but I have no idea how to change it. Even revolutions don't work as the leaders of the revolution become the new fuckors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. My question is...don't they already pass all
their tax liabilities on to the consumer in the price they charge for their goods/services?? What would be new?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cyrano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Nothing would be new. It would just be the same old crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOTV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Business don't always pass expense increases to consumers just like they don't pass expense decrease
Business charge what maximizes profit and it's not necessarily their cost times some multiplier.

For example, if you raise their taxes but their product sits on shelves next to competing products from foreign companies who did not have their taxes raised, then raising their prices might mean their profit falls to zero becasue people buy the foreign product.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cyrano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. I'm not talking about items like Chia Pets. I'm talking about
necessities like food, gas, electricity, water, insurance, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Then let those who CONSUME pay the taxes. Those of us who are trying
to leave the uber-consumer culture behind will pay less, and the people who have to buy every goddam new toy that comes along can pay more.

Works for me.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. That works for me, too. Except I'd like to keep an exemption for those items that are
used to make a living...when I buy a color printer for my business, I'm not able to get by with a $99.00 unit; I need a specialized proofer that runs almost three grand because of the nature of my business.

But, as I said, I agree. If I have a good year with my business, and want to go out and buy a car that costs $40K, it SHOULD cost me more, proportionally, in taxes, than a car that costs $18K would.

I'd be happy to have that arrangement.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think we should only tax twenty families for the next 8 years
Edited on Fri Dec-07-07 05:33 PM by IanDB1
Let's tax the richest 20 families in America-- the ones who spent millions of dollars lobbying against the Estate Tax-- at 99% for the next 8 years.

Gallo, Walton, etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. Oh, yeah, sure. Then you'll only have to pay twenty times as much for anything you buy that's
made by a corporation. Which, actually, is just about everything you buy.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. Wouldn't this just result in a horribly regressive tax?
The tax would be passed on down to consumers as a kind of "sales tax" and sales taxes are horribly regressive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. Yes
It would hurt those who live paycheck to paycheck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. Here's why this cannot work....
Edited on Fri Dec-07-07 05:40 PM by MathGuy
In 2006 the individual income tax raised $1044bn, while the corporate tax raised $354bn.

http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/81xx/doc8116/05-18-TaxRevenues.pdf

Given that the maximum corporate rate is currently 35%, in order to replace the individual income tax revenue it would have to increase to approximately 35% * (1044+354)/354 = 138%. And you don't have to be a corporatist to see why this would not work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Then consumers would have an extra 1 trillion to buy items the corporations are selling!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. bermuda and the caymans would LOVE that-
they'd get EVEN MORE corporations to move their world headquarters to a post office box or strip mall there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. I believe that should be made illegal for any corporation
doing business in the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. a lot of things should be made illegal for corporations...
Edited on Fri Dec-07-07 06:12 PM by QuestionAll
but when both political parties in congress are well stocked with corporatists- that AIN'T gonna happen... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pennylane100 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. If corporations only paid their fair share,
we would be lucky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizfeelinggreat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. amen
That is the discussion our country needs to have. No More Big Business Welfare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Esra Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
18. Philosophically it is more appropriate to extract tax when the
entity is using the product of the society.
Income tax is negative because you are stifling the input to productivity.
My guess is that a flat 10% income tax and a variable VAT (value added tax).
This should mean you can eliminate all other taxes.
That is my two penneth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
23. To be combined with tarrifs, and taxes on those who make over 1 million/year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC